Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FYI...................
1 posted on 08/02/2018 9:22:46 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: Red Badger

I’m taking mine at 66.


2 posted on 08/02/2018 9:24:09 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Liberals, piss off. That is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Do you have to sign up for Medicare when you sign up for Social Security?
Can you take Social Security WITHOUT joining Medicare?


3 posted on 08/02/2018 9:27:27 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

These kinds of articles never mention the possibility that SS payouts would be reduced in the coming years. With each passing year and SS drifts toward insolvency on paper, that possibility increases.


9 posted on 08/02/2018 9:30:56 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I took mine at 62.5, not knowing how long I will live.


12 posted on 08/02/2018 9:31:20 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

How long will you live? If you plan on living a long time - wait.

If you are obese, you smoke and drink, have a poor family history, and are generally not in good health now? Take Social Security as soon as possible.


13 posted on 08/02/2018 9:32:44 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Kind of a moot argument to me and my generation since I doubt we’ll ever see a penny of it by the time we could quality. Of course that won’t stop the government from forcing us to pay in to this scam :S


15 posted on 08/02/2018 9:33:42 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
I'll be taking it at 62. I just retired at 56 from the post office, and I get what's known as the "Special Supplement" until age 62. In essence, it gives me an additional add-on to my pension (almost) equal to what I will get from Social Security at age 62.

I had a choice between getting a bit more from SS if I retired at 66 or 70, or retiring now at 56. No contest.

20 posted on 08/02/2018 9:35:37 AM PDT by Simon Green ("Arm your daughter, sir, and pay no attention to petty bureaucrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’m going to start taking my Social Sec. later this year, a few months after I turn 62. Why? A. Who knows if this manner of individual payout will remain in force for the next few decades? I have heard of pension plans for huge industries such as General Motors. being ‘adjusted’ in spite of what was promised. Sometimes, the pension simply becomes too expensive to maintain. Retirees in Michigan were furious, but there was exactly nothing that could be done about it. The monies really were needed elsewhere. Apparently, it was also legal. I know Social Security is not the same thing as a pension, per se. But it’s similar enough.

B. Due to certain health conditions, I don’t know if I’ll even be around in ten years, let alone able to get out and job hunt. I guess none of us really knows. I don’t have a great amount saved up for retirement. Therefore, I have an attitude of making my present life as comfortable as I can, without going Hog-wild, economically speaking.


23 posted on 08/02/2018 9:36:28 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Seems like 64 is the spot for me. My full retirement is 66 1/2. I’ve seen too many people put it off, start collecting and die not long after that. Another thing I factor in is advice from my nearly 90 year old neighbor. He tells me that you may think you need a lot of money when you’re in your 60s, but by the time you hit late 70s, you just don’t need much money, you don’t do as much.


24 posted on 08/02/2018 9:36:55 AM PDT by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
My wife and I both starting drawing our SS when we retired at 62.

Luckily, we're still in relatively good health at 69 and 70. The smaller monthly amounts at age 62 hasn't affect our lifestyle at all.

Everybody's different but I don't understand the rationale for starting to draw it later, when you may not be around.

Between 60 and 70 is when many people start to have health issues and/or die. Most of my high school classmates who have died, have done so in this age decade.

What little extra money you would have received by waiting until later, pales in comparison to getting the money into your hands earlier when you can still spend it. Deciding to draw it at an older age may be too late.

Part of something is always better than all of nothing.

25 posted on 08/02/2018 9:37:04 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I took it at 62 because it worked out better for me to collect for an extra 4 years at a rate similar to the rate you get when you collect at 66. I turned 64 on July 1 and have been enjoying my SS for two years, and still have 2 more years I wouldn’t have had I waited. I wouldn’t really collect all that much more per month if I’d waited til I was 66. My husband is 71 and is a cancer survivor and not as healthy as me, I’m sorry to say, but should he pass away before me, I will drop mine and collect his, which at a lower rate than he collects now will still be more than what I would have collected at my 66 year old rate. So why not collect it for those extra four years?


29 posted on 08/02/2018 9:40:16 AM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’m 30 years away from retirement. I’m expecting that I’ll have only my pension and savings.


33 posted on 08/02/2018 9:42:50 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Check your gene pool. If you relatives did not live beyond 66 or even 70 take it ASAP.


43 posted on 08/02/2018 9:51:54 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Furthermore, if you plan on working into your early 60s, then you should know that if your income exceeds limits, the IRS will tax some of your Social Security until you reach your full retirement age. In those cases, delaying when you claim so that you lower your income taxes might be a smart choice.

it's a little more involved than this.

If you work an take SS early, there is a dollar for dollar reduction of SS based on an earnings limit.
If you take SS at FRA (Full Retirement Age) and still work, your SS benefit could be subject up to 85% taxed depending on how much you earn.

https://www.ssa.gov/planners/retire/whileworking.html
45 posted on 08/02/2018 9:52:45 AM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.Of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

My wife is considerably younger than I am, so it looks like it makes the most sense for me to take at 70, so that she gets a full allotment after I eventually pass on.


46 posted on 08/02/2018 9:53:13 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

62. There is no guarantee you will live to collect it all so start as soon as you can.

You were supposed to be dead at 57 years and your wife at 62. Then came Penicillin.


52 posted on 08/02/2018 9:55:23 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Course, if you way you may not make it.

Depends on if you would rather take the benefit and infest the money yourself or if you count on living long enough.


53 posted on 08/02/2018 9:55:47 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’m taking mine at 62; four short years! I have healthcare through the VA, and I can still work from home and earn up to $17,040.00 and not lose a penny. (2018 figure; I’m figuring it’ll go up.) I’ll let my IRA $ ‘cook’ until I HAVE to touch it when I’m in my 70’s.

At this point I’m waiting to see if I’ll take mine, or the Ex-husband’s, whichever is more. He had some VERY high earning years when we were married...before he flushed his life down the cr@pper. :(

That’s the plan, anyway. Life LOVES to throw you a curve-ball once you have it all planned out. ;)


57 posted on 08/02/2018 9:58:12 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Thanks


65 posted on 08/02/2018 10:04:35 AM PDT by hadaclueonce ( This time I am Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I did not start collecting SS when I turned 62, as I don’t need it, even though I retired at 60. My wife and I both have significant pension income. But when one of us dies, the larger the SS payout, the better off that person will be. If I wait until 70 and die at 69, I’ll be too dead to care that I never got a dime. Had I started at 62 and live to be 90, I’d definitely care that I have a much smaller monthly check vs having waited until FRA or 70.


68 posted on 08/02/2018 10:05:34 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson