To: simpson96
She quit rather than sign the contract, is the impression I got from the article. And that’s a good thing. Tatts used to be a sign of low life and trashy on women, but times change.
5 posted on
08/04/2018 11:47:26 AM PDT by
sparklite2
(See more at Sparklite Times)
To: sparklite2
“Tatts used to be a sign of low life and trashy on women, but times change.”
The women have changed. What was once “low life and trashy” is now mainstream.
9 posted on
08/04/2018 11:49:51 AM PDT by
vladimir998
(Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: sparklite2
"Tatts used to be a sign of low life and trashy on women, but times change."That has NOT changed.
19 posted on
08/04/2018 11:58:25 AM PDT by
Reno89519
(No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
To: sparklite2
Tatts used to be a sign of low life and trashy on women ...and still are to me. Would you buy a house with gang graffiti all over it?
21 posted on
08/04/2018 12:00:33 PM PDT by
OrangeHoof
(CNN - the most busted name in news.)
To: sparklite2
no they havent changed that much.
42 posted on
08/04/2018 12:21:01 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: sparklite2
This article also suggests that she was crowned, got the tattoos, then was asked to sign a contract whereby she'd have to cover up on official business.
Frankly, the fact that she opted to resign her title vs lawyer up with Gloria Allred and demand on CNN that she retain her title and belittle the "patriarchal" Chamber over their after-the-fact contract ploy, is a pretty encouraging sign for people who disdain Millenials.
To: sparklite2
“Tatts used to be a sign of low life and trashy on women, but times change”
Yes. A lot more trashy low life women (and men).
47 posted on
08/04/2018 12:24:51 PM PDT by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: sparklite2
Tats are a sign of ignorance. These women have no idea how incredibly ugly those tats will be as they pass 60. Not just ugly, I mean nauseating on thin and wrinkled skin.
49 posted on
08/04/2018 12:29:42 PM PDT by
McGavin999
("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jeffersons)
To: sparklite2
Still a sign of low-class trash.
I hate them. Hate them more since it’s a sign of how trashy our whole society has become. “Mainstream”...may I NEVER be mainstream if it means immoral libertinism.
Never mind how damn ugly they can be; they look dirty. Why would one mutilate and deface one’s God-given body?
57 posted on
08/04/2018 12:48:44 PM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
To: sparklite2
Tatts used to be a sign of low life and trashy on women, but times change.
Can't wait to see the backs and arms of the trash today who tat their arms and backs when they're lying in the sun on the decks of their retirement homes in their 60's, 70's and 80's.........
I'm thinking newspaper cartoon pages after being soaked in water for a week.........LOL!
65 posted on
08/04/2018 1:21:32 PM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(I once found a needle in a haystack but it wasn't the one I was looking for...)
To: sparklite2
Now just a sign of poor judgement and impulse control.
81 posted on
08/04/2018 2:25:12 PM PDT by
Kozak
(DIVERSITY+PROXIMITY=CONFLICT)
To: sparklite2
For most people in this country, tattoos are still trashy and low class. Period.
84 posted on
08/04/2018 2:44:17 PM PDT by
originalbuckeye
('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell.a!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson