The left never burns their ammunition. No matter who it is, they’ll have something.
I truly believe that President Trump is saving someone like Ted Cruz to replace Ginsburg or Sotomayor. Just to watch their heads explode. Did you know that there’s no requirement that the nominee be a lawyer?
Hell, their “best ammunition” was blanks. Bluff called by Grassley.
They have yet to denounce the immoralities of their leaders.
The one with the log in the eye is screaming at the splinter of another.
Grassley and friends had best wise-up and go to the Thursday vote without further delay.
Feinstein hints more secrets on Kavanaugh are coming as she stops cooperating with Grassley
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3688357/posts
You wish. The Chucky Feinswine show has already fabricated sleazy accusations against anyone Trump might nominate. None of it is true, of course, but that no longer matters.
President Trump will nominate the next best judge to replace Ginsburg—that is, the judge with the most decisions after Kavanaugh. The last nail in the coffin of political correctness was driven during the Democrat primary in 2008.
I can hear the screams of young men crying
"please no leave your clothes on"
The mere fact there is an accusation gives cover for people like Flake to vote down Kavanaugh. If there is an upside, the loss of Kavanaugh will enrage us deplorables. If there’s a red wave in November, and the makeup of the judiciary committee changes, then it may be possible to bring Kavanaugh back for a second shot. Also, it will smooth the way for Ginsburg’s replacement. Frankly, I think she’s holding onto life due only to inertia.
I agree that Amy Barret will be Buzzy’s replacement. May it come to pass very soon.
For the Ds to try Kavanaugh-like character assassination on a woman will scuttle their possibilities of victory in many future elections. Women are far more vindictive than men.
I read this travesty as an admission they know they’ll lose in November - so they have nothing to lose. They can be as pathetic and outrageous as they want...
...and no, I’m not complacent.
If the Republican gain happens, proportional committee assignments would reduce Democrat representation by several seats, perhaps going from the current 10R-9D to 12R-7D or better.
Democrats would have a much harder time grandstanding with such smaller representation. Republicans would dominate the hearings by nearly 2:1.
This is why they are making their last stand here and now.
-PJ
The best upside is that down deep . . . in secret . . . Kavanaugh now hates their guts.
To: TigerClaws
https://news.iheart.com/featured/rush-limbaugh/content/2018-09-18-rush-limbaugh-blog-two-rumors-that-could-be-fake-news-but-ring-true/
RUSH: Okay, folks. I want to share some things with you that may be fake news, but if they’re not fake, I want to be on record as having had them for you. There’s a Twitter thread out there. I have no idea the veracity because, as you know, I do not “twit.” But this particular thread claims that the reason that Dianne Feinstein was reluctant to go public with Christine Blasey Ford’s letter is because she received a similar letter from the woman about Judge Gorsuch. No idea whether this is fake news or true.
But given who we’re talking about here, I can believe that it would be true, ‘cause I think we’re dealing with genuinely disturbed, emotionally depraved, poisoned-with-hatred lunatics. I have no idea if it’s true. There’s another bit of news going around that has a little bit more credibility but still it doesn’t pass the “definitely happened” test. It is that Peter Strzok Smirk and Lisa Page were caught destroying evidence on their final days at the FBI. Neither two bits of news can be confirmed. But let me tell you something.
The New York Times and the Washington Post and USA Today and all the rest of them are publishing fake news and lies every damn day without one bit of concern whether they’re true or not, and half of them they didn’t even bother to correct. And it’s not something normally that I get into. But these two things have the tinge of believability to them, and I just want to get them out there in case it eventuates that they’re actually true. I can’t confirm either one.
But you know, I’m sick and tired of being hampered here. These people get to lie and distort and do whatever they want under the banner of premier journalism each and every day, making up sources, making up quotes, writing such things as, “President Trump, without evidence, today claimed” blah, blah. But they never say, “Christine Blasey Ford, without evidence, claimed today that Brett Kavanaugh pinned her down in a high school room in a house and so forth 42 years ago when they both were...” Who knows.
This article originally appeared on Rush Limbaugh
Comments
Rush Limbaugh
RUSH LIMBAUGH
Want to know mor
To: TigerClaws
https://news.iheart.com/featured/rush-limbaugh/content/2018-09-18-rush-limbaugh-blog-two-rumors-that-could-be-fake-news-but-ring-true/
RUSH: Okay, folks. I want to share some things with you that may be fake news, but if they’re not fake, I want to be on record as having had them for you. There’s a Twitter thread out there. I have no idea the veracity because, as you know, I do not “twit.” But this particular thread claims that the reason that Dianne Feinstein was reluctant to go public with Christine Blasey Ford’s letter is because she received a similar letter from the woman about Judge Gorsuch. No idea whether this is fake news or true.
But given who we’re talking about here, I can believe that it would be true, ‘cause I think we’re dealing with genuinely disturbed, emotionally depraved, poisoned-with-hatred lunatics. I have no idea if it’s true. There’s another bit of news going around that has a little bit more credibility but still it doesn’t pass the “definitely happened” test. It is that Peter Strzok Smirk and Lisa Page were caught destroying evidence on their final days at the FBI. Neither two bits of news can be confirmed. But let me tell you something.
The New York Times and the Washington Post and USA Today and all the rest of them are publishing fake news and lies every damn day without one bit of concern whether they’re true or not, and half of them they didn’t even bother to correct. And it’s not something normally that I get into. But these two things have the tinge of believability to them, and I just want to get them out there in case it eventuates that they’re actually true. I can’t confirm either one.
But you know, I’m sick and tired of being hampered here. These people get to lie and distort and do whatever they want under the banner of premier journalism each and every day, making up sources, making up quotes, writing such things as, “President Trump, without evidence, today claimed” blah, blah. But they never say, “Christine Blasey Ford, without evidence, claimed today that Brett Kavanaugh pinned her down in a high school room in a house and so forth 42 years ago when they both were...” Who knows.
This article originally appeared on Rush Limbaugh
Comments
Rush Limbaugh
RUSH LIMBAUGH
Want to know mor
They are shameless. They have no ethics and no conscience. They will ruthlessly try to destroy the old goat’s replacement just as they are trying with Kavanaugh.
Big stakes. All over the media. One clue to what is very important to the left is the radio “news” on the hour and the half hour. They have only a few minutes, so they use their time to promote their agenda to the fullest. They are leading with the Kavanaugh story.
This will harm #metoo.
It is exposed as the misandry that it is.
You think they are going to run out of lies?