Posted on 09/25/2018 9:37:23 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
Thanks Jack. Miss you. :-)
The Washington Post should have been banned or relegated to the back room a long time ago. But it is still here.
None of you believed that Trump had a plan to take out the deep state either. But it is proving to be the case; day after day. Trump campaigned with that promise(to drain the swamp), but none of you doubting Thomas’s even believed him.
Trump willing- The day will come when the Q bashers will be the ones who feel like complete fools. This particular incident is far from the only example. And there are far better ones. Yes it is true that coincidences exist in this world. But at some point it becomes mathematically impossible for so many “coincidences” to exist at the same time. We are way past that time. But as evidenced on a thread like this there are many who self-censor themselves. They refuse to even look at the evidence. Otherwise they might be convinced. And that is their biggest fear.
For so many years the population refused to believe that the leaders of the world could be so corrupt. Anyone who pointed it out were called kooks, and conspiracy theorists. Under Trump the world is beginning to see.
Yet some still sleep.
“Believing Is Seeing!!!”. -Q
Keep sending us hits for ca$h!!!
Don’t forget, they said Sessions went to 2 Supreme Court Judges to consult about him unrecusing.
For real. They said that. Recently.
Nonsense.
You set up a straw man fallacy and you knock it down.
Your comment is false. Myself, I've been describing Trump playing the long game.
Most here trust that Trump has a plan. What we don't agree with is that Sessions is part of that plan. He is NOT. He is recused.
They ignore all the Q errors and they after-the-fact co-opt the real work that is being done by Trump, but the committees and by Tom Fitton as being part of the Q Plan.
They're not right.
I like to attack Sessions as much as anyone else for what I can see. But what if it turns out that sessions is and has been part of the long game all along. Would you consider Q more credible at that point? I’ll bet not.
Did you not see Jim’s thread about posting Q material on Q threads only
I've been following JW for over 20 years and to say I'm not impressed is an understatement. IMO it's just a moneymaking business, it was under Clayman, and now Fitton is it's main benefactor.
How much do you think he pays himself? I'll bet it's huge.
(and I am no Q fan either)
Feel free to tell yourself whatever it takes.
.
Perhaps you’re simply not sufficiently gifted in the cognitive sense to be impressed.
JW is clearly the most effective legal operation on the planet.
They have obtained docs that congress has failed to get.
.
Really? I never saw that, and I follow this stuff pretty close.
Can you post a link that doesn't originate with "Q said". IE: The Washington Post, The Washington Examiner, National Review, ABC News, Breitbart, the Daily Caller or any other actual news organization (like one can do a post from here on Free Republic) and not something from Neon Revolt or Christian Medic or others of that ilk.
.
“Okeydoker” is part of the disloyal opposition to Trump.
.
.
Feel free to have intercourse with your hinder parts!
.
Feel free to have intercourse with your hinder parts!
————-
This is a perfect example of why q people are considered mentally unstable
.
A few weeks ago they got more Strzok-Page text messages, as a result of a FOIA lawsuit:
A few days before that:
Also, the same day:
The day before that
Judicial Watch Sues to Retrieve Emails the FBI Found on Anthony Weiner’s Laptop
In fact I think they are a huge asset to our side. They do all the basic blocking and tackling needed to score touchdowns against the Deep State.
The word “acquisitions” is inappropriate. The word to use is “accusations.” It is pretty funny, actually.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.