Skip to comments.
Q proof
Twitter ^
| 09/19/18
| Bansheemanshee
Posted on 09/25/2018 9:37:23 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Please see my post #8
“AM, can you please move this per CJ Wolf. I didn’t know the new rule.”
To: Jack Black
It was here on FR, about 2 weeks ago. I’ll see if I can dig it up. I know the qooks here were defending it as true (and rightly getting trashed for it). Laugh out loud stulidity.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; Jim Robinson
At post 8 I asked the Admin Moderator...
“AM, can you please move this per CJ Wolf. I didn’t know the new rule.”
To: arrogantsob
LOL, yes, I realize that. But nothing is “misspelled.”
64
posted on
09/25/2018 11:55:22 AM PDT
by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: editor-surveyor
So you think that spouting Filth somehow makes you more credible.
65
posted on
09/25/2018 12:01:31 PM PDT
by
Revel
To: editor-surveyor
Perhaps you’re simply not sufficiently gifted in the cognitive sense to be impressed.==========
Maybe so. For example, you don't impress me.
66
posted on
09/25/2018 12:01:45 PM PDT
by
sailor76
(Trump is our last hope!)
To: PetroniusMaximus
The Mod can't "move" this thread. There is not "sub-thread" function on FR. The Mod can delete this thread, but then people who don't know where the new thread is would lose the links.
So, maybe leave it with all the pointers to the "right place".
There is only one "legal Q thread" at a time, you can't start a new thread, you can only comment on the existing one.
It's a bit different than how most things work around here, in fact it's sort of retro - reminds me of real early Clinton (Bill) era Freepin' when we had quite a few recurring threads like that, with big custom intros, people posting things over and over ..
To: Okeydoker
Okeydoker” is part of the disloyal opposition to Trump. —————— 😂😂😂😂😂 1. Not being a Q nut doesnt make you a liberal 2. Not being a Q nut doesnt make you a troll 3. Not being a Qnut doesnt make you any less a trump supporter.
To: Jack Black; sailor76
Exactly right Jack Black.
Clayman never got much done, and he's gone now.
Fitton has been getting a lot of documents using FOIA requests.
69
posted on
09/25/2018 12:44:22 PM PDT
by
FreeReign
(Rudy: Sessions is recused from everything)
To: Okeydoker
> “Sorry, i dont waste time and bandwidth on q crap”
Oh yeah you do, on every Q thread just like here. But then your posts are a waste. So it’s a wash.
70
posted on
09/25/2018 6:47:53 PM PDT
by
Hostage
(Article V (Proud Member of the Deranged Q Fringe))
To: Hostage
Oh yeah you do, on every Q thread just like here. But then your posts are a waste. So it’s a wash. ——————- And all of Q’s bullies And all of Q’s men Couldn’t put Q back together again Stick a fork in it, Q is done🔥👹💩
To: Okeydoker; Jack Black
72
posted on
09/26/2018 7:27:43 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
Enjoy them while they last!
To: bagster
Admit it: you miss me and the Q threads are boring now.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
