Why Is the NYT Suddenly Opposed to Declassifying the FISA Docs?

weekly standard ^ | September 24, 2018 | eric felton

[Retvet]

Maybe they are afraid what it says about their Russian collusion. After all they are the leader of the American communist movement. I base this on their articles.

[ronnie raygun]

uh..........................they’re involved big time?

[PapaBear3625]

Most prominently, the New York Times decried as terribly dangerous the very idea of making the FISA materials public.

It's an indication that they know that what's in it will hurt the Democrats and Deep State.

[palmer]

Muellers not going to stop until he's stopped or until he delivers the impeachment report to congress.

I think you are correct about the second. The Impeachment report will be full of innuendo and ultimately meaningless. Then Trump can drop the hammer.

[palmer]

It's an indication that they know that what's in it will hurt the Democrats and Deep State.

It will bury the deep state. However it is complicated and will take a long time to fully understand and investigate. The indictments will start in Feb 2021

https://services.epoch.cloud/public-labs/files/spygate.jpg

[kabar]

I will trust him to determine the best time to release the documents. He seems to be the master of the media.

[Cvengr]

So how can somebody ask, not to release it for security concerns, unless they knew what was in it?

[PapaBear3625]

Because Rotten Rod has told Trump that Mueller will consider that obstruction of justice and add it to the long laundry list of crimes that he’s going to present to the new congress.

If Republicans hold Senate and House, that threat goes away.

[IamConservative]

Wolf sent his little reporterette he was sleeping with a text message that was the exact number of pages as the FISA warrant. Many think the NYT already has an unredacted copy of the Carter Page FISA warrant. George Papadop has also insinuated that the NYT has a copy of a FISA warrant on him as well. That these haven’t leaked or been published tells you it isn’t good news for the cabal.

[Bonemaker]

“Most prominently, the New York Times decried as terribly dangerous the very idea of making the FISA materials public. “
Probably because Brennan and Comey said ixnay.

[Jim Noble]

This question is actually quite interesting.

I have tried and tried to come up with something, ANYTHING, which could be in those documents which would “threaten national security”, but even with my conspiracy hat on, I can’t think of anything.

[bert]

While the reporters and writers have First Amendement protection, the publisher has no protection against indictment for conspiracy to overthrow the government

[monkeyshine]

That’s a good point, but also goes well beyond just these documents. RR is busted like five times over. He needs POTUS protection about as much as anyone and yet he may be the only person with any bit of leverage at all in the whole cockamamie scheme by virtue of controlling what Mueller does and what he reports to Congress.

[zeestephen]

Re: “I will trust him to determine the best time to release the documents. He seems to be the master of the media.”

Since 40%-45% of likely voters want Donald Trump impeached, I am skeptical.

[Baynative]

RE: "...if releasing the docs could in any way harm the Trump admin, then they’d be demanding they be released in full."

I've noticed that the Grassley report exposing all the liars recruited by Feinstein and associates to smear Kavanaugh has been ignored.