Posted on 11/11/2018 9:57:33 AM PST by Jyotishi
Or Diana....
Royal Kardashianism.
So... a bit like Eleanor of Aquitaine?
Looks like Michigan and Minnesota.
My crystal ball just spelled out divorce ahead.
Damn straight she was getting knocked up ASAP... she knows shes dug the biggest gold there is, she aint letting it go..
Youve got that right!
There are no coincidences with the Royals. Harry’s marriage takes him out of the running for the crown.
Totally different IMO.
Fergie was childish, giggling and acting like a toddler .... yelling and laughing inappropriately.
Megan is entitled. Feels she is owed things. Demanding and .... stuck up!
I know exactly what it means. The fine point is they DID take vows and they WERE married for some period of time. That’s the reality. Your fine point is the legality.
Someone who by birth get billions in their lifetime and anointed a “leader” has a problem with someone else moving in??
England is a joke.
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/03/museum-british-colonisation-india-170312082632399.html
I imagine the press’s fine point is to paint a more flattering bio of Meghan.
The queen is a crazy old bat.
Not sure which is worse, a British monarch fighting over a tiara or an American citizen demanding one.
Firsty-firsty-first world problems, yaaassss.
He's still sixth in the line of succession, after William's three children. She attended Catholic school, but supposedly isn't Catholic, so on what do you base your claim?
1. Charles
2. William (Charles' first son)
3. George (William's first child)
4. Charlotte (William's second child)
5. Louis (William's third child)
6. Harry (Charles' second son)
7. Andrew (Charles' eldest brother)
8. Beatrice (Andrew's first child)
9. Eugenie (Andrew's second child)
10. Edward (Charles' next eldest brother)
11. James (Edward's first child)
12. Louise (Edward's second child)
13. Anne (Charles' sister; she is older than Andrew and Edward, but the rules re female heirs were only changed 4 or 5 years ago in case William had a female firstborn; Anne may not ascend as long as she has a brother living due to the former rule giving precedence to males)
14. Peter (Anne's first child)
15. Zara (Anne's second child)
And 43 others more distantly related, such as children of Princess Margaret, the deceased sister of the Queen, and then the Queen's cousins and their children
Actually, she is not. She is an amazing modern monarch and if anyone is crazy as a bat, it's her son and heir. It's no wonder she has retained her position even at her advanced age rather than let Charles and Camilla take over. At 92, she is still carrying out numerous public engagements for ceremonial and charitable events nearly every day (sometimes several a day), meets with the Prime Minister weekly, reviews a box of documents from Parliament daily, and supervises palace staff for Buckinghom Palace and Windsor Castle, especially for state events such as the reception of foreign dignitaries. Most people would have been dead two decades ago.
I don’t think it is in the cards for Harry ever to ascend to the throne. He’s been told it will never happen. The queen has the DNA evidence.
That’s why he has been acting out - jumping naked into Las Vegas swimming pools, marrying a twice before married actress who is black.
He’ll end up like Diana if he ever tries.
ROTFL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.