Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Fourth National Climate Assessment violates scientific integrity
Edberry.com ^ | Edwin Berry, Ph.D., Physics

Posted on 11/27/2018 5:15:00 PM PST by Hot Tabasco

In 1988, the Environmental Protection Agency called a meeting of atmospheric scientists. I remember well the meeting in a theater-like lecture room in the San Francisco Bay Area. I knew the atmospheric scientists from Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Stanford Research Institute, and local colleges.

A man in a suit walked up to the lectern. He told us:

Global warming is a new national problem. Human CO2 emissions cause dangerous global warming. Future research funding will focus on predicting climate disasters.


TOPICS: Outdoors; Science; Society; Weather
KEYWORDS: climate; fakescience; hoax11272018
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
I've become a follower of this gentleman and all his articles debunking man-made global warming are wonderful reads.............
1 posted on 11/27/2018 5:15:00 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

The solar cycle climate model is 93% accurate at predicting present-day climate based on historical climate data.
https://nextgrandminimum.com/2018/11/22/professor-valentina-zharkova-breaks-her-silence-and-confirms-super-grand-solar-minimum/

No climate “scientist’s” computer model comes close to that degree of accuracy and never will because of the impossibility of knowing and mapping a virtually infinite number of initial conditions at a precise moment in time.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/09/04/chaos-climate-part-3-chaos-models/

The only reason climate “scientists” don’t use the solar cycle climate model is because it doesn’t give them the result they want; global warming.


2 posted on 11/27/2018 5:18:12 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Yeah but what about Martian volcanos? 🌋
3 posted on 11/27/2018 5:23:47 PM PST by rktman ( #My2nd! Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

The climate change clown show is proof that even STEM is not immune from the infections of low-T and very low science progressives.

After all, if one wants climate research funds, where do they go?

To the swamp, of coure. You know, that fetid, floating feces sewer led not by those with real talent, but by lawyers, politicians, and others who have never invented anything or ever will.


4 posted on 11/27/2018 5:24:21 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Wow, best post of the day. I signed up as well.


5 posted on 11/27/2018 5:41:19 PM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
In 1988 ... A man in a suit walked up to the lectern. He told us: Global warming is a new national problem. Human CO2 emissions cause dangerous global warming.

Only ten years prior to that the scientific community held the lockstep consensus that the Earth was cooling drastically and a new ice age was nearly upon us!

Let that sink in.

6 posted on 11/27/2018 6:06:01 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
...who have never invented anything or ever will.

C'mon, they DID invent creative ways to separate us from our money.
7 posted on 11/27/2018 6:14:26 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Only ten years prior to that the scientific community held the lockstep consensus that the Earth was cooling drastically and a new ice age was nearly upon us!

As it turns out, their original consensus was correct. A new mini ice age is indeed upon us.

8 posted on 11/27/2018 6:14:32 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It’s too late. We were all already dead twenty years ago. they told us so.


9 posted on 11/27/2018 6:15:26 PM PST by A strike (Import Third World become Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I really don’t see that, Windy. It’s warmer now than it was in the 1700s and cooler than it was during the Medieval warming period. Rather moderate for an inter-glacial period.

Since inter-glacial periods have averaged 10k-15k years and this one started approx. 11k-12k years ago we’re definitely approaching the zero hour for the next glacial period though.


10 posted on 11/27/2018 6:21:48 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A strike

That must be why I feel so lethargic! :)


11 posted on 11/27/2018 6:23:13 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
"Properly done, human-caused climate science must progress through the following steps ..."

Even that article contains a false assumption, a premise, from which the rest of the article HAS to progress. It's giving the global-warming/climate-change phonies a basis for their existence.

The assumption or premise is that, the warming is "human-caused". From that point on, the junk science has been given a credible existence from which a lot more assumptions an junk science emanate.

Liberals like to create false premises, such as, voter ID laws/regulations harm minorities. From that point on, the other side is on the defensive.

Give an inch, and you're stuck trying to prevent them from taking a mile. Destroy the premise from the very start, and the problem is solved before it is given a false existence.
12 posted on 11/27/2018 6:26:46 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I really don’t see that, Windy. It’s warmer now than it was in the 1700s and cooler than it was during the Medieval warming period. Rather moderate for an inter-glacial period.

Time to catch up. Real climatologists have been predicting the imminent onset of a Maunder-type solar minimum for quite some time now.

The internet is chock-full of articles and videos on the subject. There are also dozens of scholarly books available on the topic. Begin perusing some of this stuff and you'll quickly discover how solid the science behind it is.

You haven't heard much about this, because it flies in the face of the global warming myth. That's rapidly changing, though, due to the fact that millions of people are suddenly seeking answers for the recent drop in temperatures they're seeing right outside their own windows.

A good place to start would be with videos of John Casey, an eminent climate researcher/scientist who's written some of the definitive books on the subject:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=john+casey+solar+minimum

13 posted on 11/27/2018 6:55:29 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I am well aware of all of that. There is still no evidence that it is currently happening in spite of the honest effort involved.


14 posted on 11/27/2018 6:59:40 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I am well aware of all of that. There is still no evidence that it is currently happening in spite of the honest effort involved.

Hate to disagree, but the evidence for an impending grand solar minimum is practically overwhelming, starting with core samples which clearly show a repeating pattern of planetary heating and cooling going back millions of years.

Careful study of those cores shows that we are at the very tail end of the present warm period, and have actually already entered a new era of drastic cooling. It even has a name: the Eddy Minimum.

If you're unconvinced, perhaps it's because you haven't reviewed all of the evidence and scholarly work supporting it. In the aggregate, it's a considerable body of work. I highly suggest you spend a bit of time really digging into it before dismissing it out of hand.

15 posted on 11/27/2018 7:20:37 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

The “drastic cooling” does not yet exist so while the theory may be strong it is still just a theory.


16 posted on 11/27/2018 7:33:30 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Have you ever seen wattsupwitthat.com for debunking the climate change myth?


17 posted on 11/27/2018 7:36:18 PM PST by raybbr (That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as wll say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!"to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

L8r


18 posted on 11/27/2018 7:51:52 PM PST by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
The “drastic cooling” does not yet exist so while the theory may be strong it is still just a theory.

That's the thing, though. It's not a theory. The earth goes through a repeating pattern of cyclical climate variations that are written into the geologic record.

Real climate scientists have studied that record for decades, and can point you to exactly where we are on that recurring cycle right now.

Those studies are bolstered by observations and measurements of the sun's activity, which also goes through a recurring pattern of behaviors. Those behaviors are the primary driver of climate patterns on our planet, and correlate perfectly with them.

Climatologists are not formulating predictions of an impending solar minimum based on computer models. No, they're reading the actual record. What comes next is written right there in front of them. There is no guesswork, and the conclusions are inescapable -- we're entering a new era of extreme cold.

19 posted on 11/27/2018 8:28:26 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr
Here's one of his recent past articles where he actually engages in conversation with a couple of doubters who question him...

Eleven facts you MUST know to avoid being deceived by the AGW “science”

20 posted on 11/28/2018 3:31:24 AM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson