Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Requiem for National Review
Liberty Nation ^ | 01.27.19 | Joe Schaeffer

Posted on 01/27/2019 5:57:37 PM PST by Coleus

The decline of an American institution heralded by smears and contempt.

The poseurs really stepped in it this time. The “conservative” elitists at National Review may well have caused irreparable damage to their already tottering reputations, with their knee-jerk attack on a group of Kentucky high school kids in MAGA hats. Then they made things much worse with the barely concealed contempt in their shallow “apologies,” offered begrudgingly when the smear blew up in their faces.

The pile-on assault of the Covington Catholic high school kids who attended the March for Life wearing Make America Great Again hats gave full witness to the cruelty, lack of proportion and disregard for facts that mark our repulsive “mainstream” media today. Nothing new there. But what are we to conclude when a supposed “pillar of conservatism” howls with the mob in a Pavlovian manner?

Perhaps we should not be surprised. NR is the same publication which infamously devoted an entire issue in 2015 to savaging the frontrunner for the GOP presidential nomination. Titled “Against Trump,” it was dripping with scorn and contempt, most graphically expressed by Editor Rich Lowry: “America is being imperiled by the rise of a liberal reality-show carnival barker who disguises himself as a conservative.”

Scathing and Insincere

“’Bullying’ is a worn-out word and doesn’t convey the full extent of the evil on display here,” National Review deputy managing editor Nicholas Frankovich wrote in condemnation of the youths in his infamous and now-deleted article. Frankovich ham-handedly painted trouble-seeking activist Nathan Phillips as a modern-day Christ figure being crucified by a group of fresh-faced white Trump Kids from flyover country.

“Decide for yourself who is more pleasing to Christ, Phillips or his mockers,” he wrote. “As for the putatively Catholic students from Covington, they might as well have just spit on the cross and got it over with.”

The callous and obtuse article naturally infuriated readers. But it was in its attempt to explain away this acid-tongued pose that NR really showed its true colors. The back peddling began with an article on “The Covington Affair,” penned by “The Editors.” Instead of showing humility, the article asserted that Frankovich was “writing as a faithful Catholic and pro-lifer who has the highest expectations of his compatriots, not as a social-justice activist.” It also explained that Frankovich was writing for a forum that “encourages real-time, unfiltered reactions.”

And that’s just the problem these ivory tower “conservatives” don’t get. Frankovich revealed that the “real-time, unfiltered” instinct of the anti-Trump hacks who write for this publication is to viciously slander Trump supporters any chance they get. Frankovich saw a horse he could ride and instead of checking to see if it had legs to last, he snapped the reins and took off at full gallop.

The author’s own apology for his deeply offensive column was even more aloof. “I was preachy and rhetorically excessive, and I regret it,” he wrote of his “overheated post.” That’s it. That is as close to an expression of true remorse as you are going to get from this supposedly “faithful Catholic” who unjustly vilified a bunch of high school kids as “evil” personified.

Rooted Hostility

There is a very good reason why the elitists of Conservatism, Inc. can’t bring themselves to seek forgiveness from a group of Kentucky school kids. It has nothing to do with any politically partisan clash and everything to do with an urbanite aristocracy’s hatred – there is no other word for it – for regular folks from flyover country.

In addition to its sanctimonious Against Trump edition, this is the magazine, remember, that famously pronounced that rural, “white working class” towns needed to “die.” This particular savagery from former NR “star” writer Kevin Williamson in 2016 deserves to be quoted at length:

“The truth about these dysfunctional, downscale communities is that they deserve to die. Economically, they are negative assets. Morally, they are indefensible. Forget all your cheap theatrical Bruce Springsteen crap. Forget your sanctimony about struggling Rust Belt factory towns and your conspiracy theories about the wily Orientals stealing our jobs. Forget your goddamned gypsum, and, if he has a problem with that, forget Ed Burke, too. The white American underclass is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles. Donald Trump’s speeches make them feel good. So does OxyContin.”

There is only one word to describe the unfiltered bile to be found in those words: atavistic. A deep-seated, tribal hatred for working people shines through in Williamson’s seething article. Many observers at the time saw this column as another notable step off the ledge by National Review. The magazine’s descent into irrelevance has accelerated at warp speed with its nonstop attacks on Trump, and “The Covington Affair” feels like another milestone moment.

 

Rich Lowry

The evidence already exists that National Review is a failing publication. Following their Against Trump edition in 2015, globalist Senator Patrick Toomey toasted NR on its 60th anniversary. “With over 150,000 subscribers, it is the most read opinion magazine in America,” he gushed. Fast forward two years and we have an “academic member of the board of National Review” openly fretting about the mag’s “institutional survival” in the wake of all that Trump-bashing. The Atlantic quotes the unidentified board member as saying: “I mean, the number of print subscribers to National Review are down to 89,000.”

Well, now. From 150,000 subscribers all the way down to 89,000? That seems quite the circulation cull. When Bill Kristol’s equally counterfeit neoconservative rag The Weekly Standard announced in December that it was shutting down, reports stated that its circulation had dropped 28% – from 100,000 to 72,000. National Review’s decline – 40% in two years – appears to be even more precipitous.

The death watch may be on for a publication that cannot stomach the very people it pretends to champion. Ethically, such deceit is repulsive. As a business model, it simply is not sustainable. Especially in an era when grassroots conservatives are clamoring for real change to a status quo that these insufferable “conservative” elitists will apparently stop at nothing to preserve.



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: againsttrump; covington; covingtoncatholic; covingtonstudents; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; joeschaeffer; kentucky; libertynation; marchforlife; nathanphillips; nationalreview; nicholasfrankovich; richlowry; righttolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2019 5:57:37 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I was on to them years ago, but for all but the deliberately obtuse, it was clear in 2016 that they were not on the side of the citizens.


2 posted on 01/27/2019 5:59:00 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Yet, there still is Victor Davis Hanson, who often writes for them.


3 posted on 01/27/2019 6:01:24 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine ( "It's always a party when you're eating the seed corn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I am always amazed how Trump has “exposed” people like this. Many, we thought, were on “our” side. So many were against us, and they just keep dying off. Love him to death, but even Krauthammer got caught up in this. Trump has put a bright light in very dark places. (Thank you Mr. President!)


4 posted on 01/27/2019 6:02:18 PM PST by ThePatriotsFlag (We are getting even more than we voted for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
The “conservative” elitists at National Review

It is very very very sad that this should be the legacy of WFB and kith and kin may they RIP.

5 posted on 01/27/2019 6:02:29 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

He is the only one there worth reading.


6 posted on 01/27/2019 6:03:00 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Adios, MF’ers.
7 posted on 01/27/2019 6:03:11 PM PST by hinckley buzzard (Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

VDH is good, but he was as much a Trump basher as anyone at NR. Until he acknowledges and apologizes for his poor judgement, unless he’s just a band-wagoner, I give him little credence.


8 posted on 01/27/2019 6:08:47 PM PST by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

LOVED NR when it was WFB.

Now diseased.
VDH and Andrew McCarthy get out now!


9 posted on 01/27/2019 6:09:05 PM PST by A strike (I DEMAND my responsibilities!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Add it to the list, Weekly Standard, Drudge Report, Red State, now NRO. We deplorables just aren’t smart enough to run with these azzholes.


10 posted on 01/27/2019 6:13:01 PM PST by Equine1952 (Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

He’s probably the only NR writer I do read. When I see something by him, I read it... but usually I see it as a link. I don’t read the National Review as a source, say the way I read FR, or the Wall Street Journal.


11 posted on 01/27/2019 6:13:16 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine ( "It's always a party when you're eating the seed corn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Nicholas Frankovich would be wise to hire a lawyer experienced in defending against libel suits.


12 posted on 01/27/2019 6:21:02 PM PST by Ken H (2019 => The House of Representin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Andrew McCarthy is often worth reading, but he too can be slow on the uptake.


13 posted on 01/27/2019 6:23:29 PM PST by thoughtomator (Nobody is coming to save the day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

He writes lots of places - doesn’t need that rag.


14 posted on 01/27/2019 6:24:47 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

I wonder if Rich Lowery is handing his jacket to Bill Kristol and saying “ Here Billy old boy and watch this”. Both seem to suck huuughly!


15 posted on 01/27/2019 6:37:38 PM PST by Equine1952 (Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

The biggest problem with the Covington thing is that nothing happened that should have been national news in the first place. These kids did nothing to deserve any coverage at all, good or bad. Go to any school basketball game and you will see much worse behavior. If the indian guy hadn’t turned out to be such a lying slimeball, this would have been a career killer for these kids.

Need to start putting information together on all known “liberal activists” - bet virtually every one of them is an evil slimeball in real life. Immediately tar them with the truth whenever they get uppity.


16 posted on 01/27/2019 6:57:17 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Next American Spectator ...I hope.


17 posted on 01/27/2019 7:00:21 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

VDH has been very supportive of President Trump this past year. I really really like him/ one of the best.


18 posted on 01/27/2019 7:03:17 PM PST by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I’ve been thinking about all the lessons flowing out of the Covington Catholic story, and there are lots of them to follow.

The NR part would be important if NR were still important, but it hasn’t been for years.

There is one important point to be made, though.

To react as they did, to a “story” which amounted to an unsupported smear, so fast and so viciously - you have to have already classified the (unknown to you) subjects of the smear as “enemy”.

THAT is the only part of the NR story that’s in any sense important. White Christian children who go to Catholic school and who oppose abortion are, to Rich Lowry, David French, Jonah Goldberg, and the rest, “enemy”. Born guilty, they are.

And you are, too.


19 posted on 01/27/2019 7:04:38 PM PST by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2 = 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.

The Covington thing was hyped by the media to take the Buzzfeed story off the public’s mind.


20 posted on 01/27/2019 7:07:07 PM PST by CaptainK ('No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson