Skip to comments.
Prince Harry anxious and protective through Duchess' pregnancy
Express UK ^
| Feb 3 2019
| Kathryn Knight
Posted on 02/02/2019 9:38:28 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: lee martell
Yep, your Leeness. A disaster in the making already made. I hope I am wrong, but nothing sinks a family like bad blood and gossip in its midst.
21
posted on
02/02/2019 11:11:41 PM PST
by
Fungi
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Oh, please... Go post your fanzine gushings elsewhere😏
22
posted on
02/03/2019 12:06:57 AM PST
by
Catmom
(We're all gonna get the punishment only some of us deserve.r)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
The messages on the bananas are over the top.
23
posted on
02/03/2019 12:13:16 AM PST
by
Scram1
(an)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
LOL - some people are obviously very invested in hating this woman, for reasons that certainly have more to do with them than with her. Aside from the fact that she’s easy on the eyes, who cares?
To: nopardons
If they have a boy, will he be known as the "black prince?" 🤔
Also, at what point do distant relatives of the king/queen stop being called prince/princess? Andrew's daughter is a princess...but will his grandson/granddaughter be called a prince/princess?
25
posted on
02/03/2019 2:03:18 AM PST
by
Cowboy Bob
("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
To: Bobalu
Take your idiot male shame blame bs to democrat underground feminist crap threads.
26
posted on
02/03/2019 2:32:00 AM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Add me to Ping list Please...
27
posted on
02/03/2019 3:44:26 AM PST
by
DAVEY CROCKETT
( Amos5: Hate evil, love good, And establish justice in the (gate) Court.)
To: BunnySlippers
Ya think?
With an heir....she's set for life.
To: Bobalu
My German Shepherd can have more than 12 babies at the same time.
Color me unimpressed with the human female, and with males that worship them.
29
posted on
02/03/2019 4:13:53 AM PST
by
chris37
(No wall? No vote.)
To: Scram1
The messages on the bananas are over the top...
but, but they were for sex trade workers! It’s like the jokes write themselves.
30
posted on
02/03/2019 4:22:42 AM PST
by
mouse1
To: CondoleezzaProtege
A man being protective of his pregnant wife. How twentieth century of him.
To: BunnySlippers
I give Meghan and Harry’s marriage five years.
To: Reno89519
Yep, values of the British Royalty on display
33
posted on
02/03/2019 7:54:15 AM PST
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: Bobalu
Im in awe of every woman who opts to have a baby. AMEN
I think of that often. When our first was born I was in the delivery room and was surprised by how much was going on and how many people were involved, looked at my wife and thought, I cannot believe a woman would do this, it was so scary. I gained more respect for women and my wifes courage at that moment than any other time in my life.
PS the angel was just fine.
34
posted on
02/03/2019 7:55:49 AM PST
by
Jolla
To: nopardons
I always wondered why the Queen gave permission for Harry to marry Markle. She denied her own sister from marrying a divorced man and ruined her life. She told Andrew no on Koo Stark which was probably a good call then let him marry Fergie who was the equivalent of a tavern wench.
Wait til Meg decides to deep six Harry and move back to the states with the kid. That will be interesting.
35
posted on
02/03/2019 8:20:35 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Royalty is suppose to be a symbolic position and "a lead by example" job. Also, like any public figure/politician, they should be called out when promoting corosion.
Encouraging sex workers to stay "blinded" in that "field", promoting sodomy "rights", advocating 3rd world immigration at will, ignoring fiscal competency, and defender of 2nd and 3rd wave of feminism are not healthy roles for a royal to champion. You must welcome the degeneracy/"White Knight" defense of her because that is exactly what "she" is pushing.
Also, she is not easy on the eyes if you seen her without make-up, without hair straitening techniques/wigs, and without the aide of Photoshop/air brushing.
36
posted on
02/03/2019 8:23:49 AM PST
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: Georgia Girl 2
I always wondered why the Queen gave permission for Harry to marry Markle. Simple, because Harry has no chance of ever ascending the throne. William is next after Charles, and now he has three heirs of his own. It would have to be a pretty major tragedy for all four of them to be killed together, and Im certain Royal Family has policies in place to prevent that.
Lastly, if it ever came to that, news would come out that Harry is not actually Charles offspring, but rather the child of that soccer player that Diana had an affair with.
This entire marriage gives the Royal Family cover that they are modern and progressive without having to take any risk in the effort.
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Meghan Markle, age 41, is what it should say.
38
posted on
02/03/2019 9:31:06 AM PST
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Jolla
It hurts like hell too, especially the tissue tears where you can’t poop normally for months.
39
posted on
02/03/2019 9:34:15 AM PST
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: nopardons
Really I was just speaking generally. All that other stuff she can just shove.
40
posted on
02/03/2019 11:28:55 AM PST
by
Crucial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson