Favorite or not, he's not Charles' son...
Posted on 02/02/2019 9:38:28 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
Both of Prince Andrew's kids ONLY have the "princess" title because he begged and begged, and BEGGED/DEMANDED his mother allow them to be called that.
Neither HRH Princess Royal Anne's kids nor her brother Prince Edward's kids have the "prince" or "princess" title.
Prince William's kids, who are all now in the the Royal line of accension, have those titles now.
Harry's kid shouldn't and won't have that title...unless Sparkles pitches a fit and then Harry goes to his grandmother and throws a fit. Of course, when Sparkles threw several fits about her wedding and which tiara she wanted to wear, she was denied ALL of that.
When Diana and Charles divorced, she lost her HRH; a title honor Sparkles will NEVER have!
Less !
Sparkles can NOT move back to the USA and TAKE THE KIDS. Whatever child/children she has, are sort of the Queen's "property"!
Geek...she is NOT "easy on the eyes"! She is built like SQUARE PANTS SPONGE BOB, has skin and bone legs, NEVER wears proper for the occasion clothes, which do NOT fit, has an ugly nose, and looks unkempt.
And before I'm stupidly accused of being "jealous", I have to ask..."JEALOUS" of what? She's a nasty climber, has no idea how to behave, and I'm perfectly happy being me.
For some unknowable reason, Harry is her favorite grandchild. It really beggars understanding.
The claims, in several different Brit papers, that he is now "very protective" of Sparkles, is just a PR campaign!
Before this, when stuff came out about Harry yelling at staff ( before they were even engaged, let alone married ) that "WHAT MEGHAN WANTS, MEGHAN GETS!", was passed off as his being VERY PROTECTIVE of her, because of how his mother had been treated. UTTER GARBAGE ALL OF IT!
I’ve never been a big Harry fan. Personally, I’m pretty sure he’s as dumb as a bag of hammers. But, to your point, the press is lying and manipulating again. It’s always trying to social engineer everyone.
This entire mess ( and it IS a disaster for the the Royal Family! ) has been a massive PR campaign from the start! When Harry first went out with her, in Canada, the PR campaign started ( they claimed that she was a "well known A List actress" who was also a UN humanitarian...of all things )and it has only gotten much worse since then.
Now THE FIRM are going after people who have Facebook pages, blogs and/or TWEET negative things about Sparkles ( all of them, thus far in Canada and the USA ) and "OUTING" and condemning them!
Favorite or not, he's not Charles' son...
Great points; the royal thinks she is above protocol which is a dangerous concept to any monarchial system that seeks to sustain themselves in this modern era.
I guess Queen Elizabeth is just enjoying her remaining years and has stopped worrying about the temporal future.
That Charles reportedly used his close confidant, the pedovore Jimmy Savile, as a go-between in his feeble-if-not-doomed efforts to mediate their crumbling marriage, could not have helped how Charles and the Queen were perceived, opposite Diana.
After the tragedy-foretold of her Paris car crash, the approval rating of the royals--and the Queen in particular--plummeted as a dropped rock. Could the populace have had a sense that her death meant the Queen's patience with Diana's damage to the royals' image (e.g., cavorting with a muslim, Dodi al Fayed) had run out?
Unless he dies before assuming the throne, the Duke of Cambridge will become KING VVILLIAM V ('IAM' = I AM ; three V's (W splits into two Vs, plus three I's = VI VI VI = 'I AM 666')
They love their gematria. It's no accident. As the globalist representative who may well stand atop Mt. Moriah, could he yet fulfill the biblical prophecy of Mt. 24:15-31? No one is exposing the Hewitt-Harry connection in a way that would keep that prophecy from coming to pass.
Harry has ALWAYS looked just like his “maybe” father and NOTHING at all like Charles or his side.
Harry looks like Henry VIII
They do not look like a couple.
So one really has to wonder...is MEagain worth it?
The Queen is 92, her husband is 97 and problematic...still, so she's obviously not paying all THAT much attention; except for sending out PR brigades AND now sending the hounds after those who express a dislike of SPARKLES and DOXING them; even Americans, who she has NO real control over.
Pssssssssssssssssst...Harry and King Henry VIII share NO DNA!
You can bet that the Royal Family has already taken the "maybe" out of it. Sometime along the line, in some pediatric doctor visit, his blood has been tested and they know the truth. There's simply no point in making it public or an issue since Harry has virtually no chance of getting anywhere near the throne.
...and Diana is certainly not around to stir the pot any longer.
And I didn't like her from the get-go; she was ALWAYS a most unsuitable choice, for Charles, who only grew worse as time went on!
OTOH...she was better than SPARKLES...which is saying quite a lot!
My word! "The Act of 1871" says she (well, the globalists, via the Three City Empire, of which she's the lead bankster bill collector) owns every one of us!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.