Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the F-14 Tomcat Is Such a Badass Plane
Popular Mechanics ^ | May 3, 2019 | Alex Hollings

Posted on 05/03/2019 8:44:56 AM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: atomic_dog; C19fan; Army Air Corps; Neidermeyer; oldplayer; sparklite2; griffin; EveningStar; ...
I was on the flight deck of the USS JFK when that Tomcat went over the side. Unfortunately, I was taking a nap in the cockpit of my A-7 which was parked parallel to the waist cat. (I was a plane captain trainee in VA-46 and had to be in the cockpit of the plane in case they needed to tow it)

I woke when my plane shuddered violently from side to side, and I looked back in time to see the two tailpipes of the Tomcat go over the side, and people running up the edge of the flight deck and look over the side.

There was a Soviet cruiser on the some distance towards the horizon off the starboard bow which began to cut across our bow off in the distance (I figured to get a better look at what was going on on the port side) and I saw one of our ships churn up ahead of us on a course to cut it off. I think that was the reason we went to such lengths to get the plane off the bottom, because a Soviet vessel had seen the accident occur in real time, so they probably had a fix on the location.

LOL, seemed like every time something happened on that ship I was sleeping.

That night we collided with the USS Bordelon as we were refueling her. Again, I was sleeping at that time too as the collision occurred right behind my plane which was parked just forward of the elevator on the starboard side. (Again, I was up there to ride brakes, waiting for the plane to be moved if needed). I awoke to the sound of banging, and it was one of the crash crew guys in a silver flame retardant suit banging on the canopy with the plastic nozzle of a CO2 fire extinguisher! I was startled, and when I opened the canopy, he told me I had to get below and check in! (I sure am glad he did, because if not, I would likely have been "that guy" the whole ship would have heard my name if I didn't check in!)

Wow. What a star-crossed day. Lost a plane during the day, hit another ship at night.

Here is a link to the article: Tomcat Deep!

It is one of the most comprehensive and detailed accounts of the accident and recovery!


TOMCAT DEEP!
Published on September 14, 2012

September 14, 1976, was an unlucky day for the aircraft carrier USS John F. Kennedy. Approximately 100 miles northwest of Scapa Flow, Scotland, the ship was involved in a 100 ship naval exercise with NATO called Teamwork 76. It was Press Day and the assembled photographers of the US and Europe watched as an F-14A Tomcat from VF-32 taxied toward Catapult #3 for launch. The pilot, Lt. J. L. Kosich, and his radar intercept officer, Lt. (jg) L. E. Seymour, prepared for launch. Suddenly, the engines inexplicably roared to full power. Lt. Kosich checked the throttle, but found it was still set at idle. He stomped the brakes, but the plane began to skid forward despite the locked tires.

Ahead, a line of aircraft loomed as long black streaks of tire rubber scarred the deck. Steering left, he ran the plane toward the flight deck crew as they dived to the side. One crewman’s ankle was crushed when run over by the errant plane, the rest dodged out of the way. Then F-14A’s right wing rammed into two adjacent planes, causing significant damage — yet Lt. Kosich had saved a catastrophic crash into the full line of fueled and armed jets. Still, there was no stopping the F-14A still as it dragged the locked tires toward the edge of the deck. Finally, Lts. Kosich and Seymour ejected as the plane rolled off the deck into the waters below.

As the plane sank beneath the waves, a Soviet Navy cruiser that had been shadowing the fleet sailed close to log the position. The ramifications were clear — on board the F-14A Tomcat was America’s new and top secret AIM-54 Phoenix missile as well as its revolutionary fire control radar system, the AN/AWG-9. Knowing the Soviet Union’s deep sea recovery capabilities, it was apparent that it would be race to achieve a recovery before the sensitive technologies fell into their hands.

Six AIM-54 Phoenix missiles on the underside of a USN F-14A Tomcat. As it happened, the lost plane carried but one missile that day. Photo Credit: USN The F-14 Tomcat and its Missile Systems

The US Navy’s F-14 Tomcat was deadly for one key reason — it was equipped with a revolutionary pair of combat systems, the AIM-54 Phoenix air-to-air missile and the AN/AWG-9 radar system. Managed by the radar intercept officer in the Tomcat’s back seat, the AIM-54 and AN/AWG-9 systems could track six targets simultaneously, redirect the missile in flight to alternate targets, and perform a lock-on in track-while-scan mode. It had an extraordinary range — 100+ nm — and a speed of Mach 5. The missile had a maximum operating altitude of approximately 100,000 feet, which it incorporated into its attack profile, popping up and then descending on its targets from above. The US Military feared that the Soviets would recover the aircraft and its missiles. Through reverse engineering, the technology could help the Soviet make a dramatic leap forward in their missile quality. The US Navy would spare no effort in a veritable race against the Soviets.

Recovery Effort
The aircraft had sunk into waters that were 1,850 feet deep — and recovering the plane and its single AIM-54 Phoenix missile would be no easy matter. As the Teamwork 76 fleet sailed away, they were pleased that the Soviet shadowing ships followed. The concern was, however, that the Soviets would quickly attempt a recovery with a deep net dragged by a trawler. The US Navy ordered a 24 hour watch on the site by air. Soon a rotation of P-3C Orions out of Keflavik, Iceland, were airborne over the site.

To facilitate fast recovery before the winter season set in, a contract was put in place with Seaward, Inc., a Falls Church, Virginia, company that served the Navy’s special requirements. A Norwegian salvage ship called “Constructor” was also subcontracted, as was a side-scan sonar provider, Hydro Surveys of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The Navy itself would provide an Abnaki class fleet tug called the USS Shakori (ATF-162), then under the command of Lieutenant Commander David Sargent, and several other vessels. As it turned out, the ocean would not give up the F-14A Tomcat and its secret hardware so easily. The USS Shakori deployed the side-scan sonar gear from Hydro Surveys and searched for the lost plane. Massive seas of the increasingly cold North Atlantic popped rivers and threatened to wash crewmen overboard. Day after day for ten days, the print outs of the sonar scans showed nothing. On October 3, the sonar showed a promising target — carefully charting the location, which was a distance from where the plane was supposed to have been, the USS Shakori returned to port for repairs and supplies. After a week the ship set out once again to the spot, but on arrival, discovered that the sonar came up empty. Had the plane moved? Had it been recovered by the Soviets? Had it been dragged by a quick moving Soviet trawler. Whatever they had seen before was gone. As Naval analysts stressed that the Soviets might have undertaken a quick snatch and grab of their own, despite the wide ranging P-3C Orions, the USS Shakori commenced a new search, battered by even more violent seas.

Deploying the NR-1
As this was unfolding a Sperry engineer named Roger Sherman walked into the headquarters of Submarine Squadron Two at Holy Loch, Scotland, with an idea — why not send the Navy’s top secret NR-1 submarine to recover the plane? The answer he received was shocking — the officers in the unit had no idea what the NR-1 was, nor that it was already within close reach of the crash site. It seemed that the Navy’s top secret “research” submarine was so secret that even the senior officers on the base didn’t know of its existence or capabilities. Once convinced of the NR-1′s unique strengths, a message was sent up the chain to COMSUBLANT in Washington, DC. Shortly afterward, the Navy’s surface fleet responded — the submariners were not needed — stay out of the recovery effort.

For Roger Sherman, this was a travesty. First the NR-1 was so secret that nobody in the Navy even knew that it was perfect for the recovery. Second, the recovery effort had touched off an inadvertent turf war between the surface Navy and submariners. From experience, Sherman knew that the real clout rested with the surface side of the show — yet the submariners still had a few cards to play. He called a friend at the Pentagon who had a direct line to Admiral Rickover, the Navy’s famously ornery submarine chief. Adm. Rickover would fight the battle and, as usual, would win. In just a few hours, the word came back that the NR-1 mission was on.

The Search Succeeds
With the NR-1 proceeding to the area, the US Navy and Royal Navy deployed ships to clear the area of any Soviet vessels. Beneath the waves, the Navy ordered an attack submarine, the USS Batfish, to “sanitize” the area of any non-allied vessels. Loaded with torpedoes, the submarine cruised into the area, very aware that the unspecific nature of the term, “sanitize” had potentially profound consequences. On the surface, the HMS Blue Rover likewise cruised with its weapons systems on a hair trigger. Soviet involvement was clearly being discouraged in the most raw terms — yet even so, the Soviets sent a fleet of recovery ships backed by the Soviet Navy. As the US and Royal Navies watched, the Soviets were making their way toward the site, undeterred by the threat and intending to defend their right of recovery with arms if necessary. Days passed in additional searching before the sonar target was once again revealed on board the USS Shakori. The NR-1 was ordered to proceed to the location but found that the bottom was instead littered with boulders, each of which returned signals at varying strengths based on the angles and sizes. Finding the sonar useless, the NR-1 began a laborious box search pattern, seeking the target by eyes alone. Then, quite suddenly, the NR-1 spotted a massive tangle of numerous trawler nets ahead. The submarine reversed but was seemingly too slow — it nearly hit the nets, stopping just 20 feet from getting tangled. Backing away, the NR-1′s skipper took the submarine carefully downward to the bottom on the assumption that the nets had caught on something.

At the base of the nets, the F-14 was lying on its back, one wing crushed, apparently having been dragged by the trawler nets for miles. Someone had snagged it — was it just a deep sea fishing trawler, or was it the Soviets? Nobody knew, but it seemed obvious that there were few fish that deep to interest a commercial fisherman. Photographs of the nets and buoy floats revealed a variety of origins — French numbers, UK fleet numbers and, ominously, Cyrillic writing. It appeared that the Russians had tried to drag the plane off after all during the week while the USS Shakori back in Scotland. Most likely, the Soviets had almost gotten there first. The plane was too heavy, however, and they had failed. At least now the US NAvy had the aircraft in sight.

Yet there was one problem — the AIM-54 Phoenix missile was missing.

Recovery and Missile Search
The task before the NR-1 was challenging. The plane was snagged in multiple nets, which floated in the current and threatened to snag and trap the submarine on the bottom. The NR-1 would creep up and, keeping its stern screws away from the wreck and nuts, attempt to tie a cable around the plane with its remotely operated arm. Further complicating the task was a newly discovered deep sea phenomenon, christened on the spot as Nolter’s Maelstrom, a sudden blast of current that was the equivalent of a straight line wind, except that it raked the ocean floor. Nolter’s Maelstrom was something previously unknown to science, for which, even to this day, there are few explanations. Throughout the effort, as often as twice a day, the NR-1 would be hit by the powerful deep current wave, each time nearly tipping over the submarine.

Meanwhile, on the waves above, the Soviet Navy was nearing with its own recovery fleet. The Royal Navy did its best to shepherd away the vessels, but they closed the distance relentlessly, day after day working their way toward the site until they finally arrived. By then, a small fleet of Naval and contract vessels were on the scene. Indeed, it seemed that the Soviets had known exactly where they were heading. Yet the recovery was nearly done — or so they hoped. The Soviets arrived and a tense stand off ensued. The US Navy proceeded with its efforts at recovery while the Soviets stood by, hoping that they failed. Meanwhile, unbeknownst to the Soviets, deep below and hidden from sight, recovery lines were set by the NR-1.

Amidst yet another storm, a ship above connected to lift the aircraft. With seas of 20 feet, the lift began. The Soviets recognized that something was up and one of their ships made a run toward the US Navy ship. It was intercepted and ushered away, but the Soviets crept closer, watching or whatever evidence they could spot. The lift proceeded slowly as the ships rocketed and tossed in the heavy seas. Each wave put stress on the lift cables — and finally, the stresses were too much. Lifted nearly halfway, the line suddenly snapped and the plane fell to the bottom once more. This time it landed right side up.

The Soviets Await as the Missile is Found
The Soviets seemed pleased. They continued to wait as the US Navy adjusted their position and began the days long task of relocating the plane, setting new cables and trying another lift. Again, the NR-1 connected the lines and again the ships were connected. The cables tightened and the lift began. Yet again the plane was lifted and yet again it fell back to the sea floor when the heavy seas forced the line to part. Taking their cue from the Soviets, the US decided on a brute force solution — the plane would be roped and dragged to shallow waters by deep sea trawlers hired for the job. Meanwhile, far below, the NR-1 abandoned the delicate recovery and instead went in search of the missing AIM-54 Phoenix missile. Once more, it cruised slowly in a search pattern, eyeballing the bottom of the ocean until the missile was spotted. It rested on the bottom with only slight damage suffered. Up above, the Soviets and Americans eyed one another, the Soviets expecting that another lift attempt would soon be made.

The AIM-54 Phoenix missile as found, photographed from aboard the NR-1 submarine. Photo Credit: Capt. Allison J. Holifield, USN-Ret. Whereas the plane had been too large for the NR-1, the missile was an ideal size. The only problem was that nobody knew really if the warhead was armed and might explode during the recovery. After discussions, the NR-1 proceeded despite the risk. Positioning itself overhead, it opened its keel claw and slowly lowered itself atop the missile. Then, once certain that the missile was in the claw, it clamped gently closed. With the missile securely in hand, the NR-1 then rose to the surface, slowly rising to time its arrival on top with the darkness of midnight. The Soviets could not get a good image of the submarine in the darkness. As the NR-1 bobbed in the heavy seas, the missile was connected to cables from another surface ship. Once released from the NR-1′s keel claw, it fell away and was easily winched aboard one of the surface ships.

Recovering the F-14 Tomcat
Finally, a pair of German heavy trawlers were leased, including the “Taurus”. By dragging a heavy cable along the seabed, the two ships snagged the plane and then, as one waited, the other ran circles around the F-14 until it was virtually crushed securely into place amidst a knot of cable. Then the plane was lifted nearly to the surface and towed to shallow water, where it was properly recovered with more traditional shallow water recovery methods. Although the plane was wrecked and twisted, the key components were still there. Despite the odds, the US Navy had saved the plane and its top secret hardware from falling into Soviet hands.

The recovery was extraordinary — and even if its cost exceeded $2.4 million, the secrets preserved were far more valuable than the cost and time. The Soviets too were impressed, though not positively. In addition to losing out on an excellent opportunity to steal modern US technology, they realized that they had a new and different problem. The US Navy’s press office issued a release that described how the missile had been recovered by vessel they had never heard of before, the NR-1 — reportedly a “five man research submersible”. The existence of the NR-1 would dog Soviet intelligence officers for years to come — just what was that little submarine that had surfaced in the darkness of night and gotten the job done? How deep could it dive? What was it really doing?

ONE MORE BIT OF AVIATION HISTORY
The F-14 Tomcat and its secrets were most likely uncovered by the Soviets some years later anyway. The Tomcat and its super secret Phoenix missiles were sold to America’s key Gulf Region ally, Iran, during the 1970s. With the revolution of 1979, the Iranian Air Force would suddenly find itself in the opposition. An embargo on spare parts and systems would hamper the Iranian’s ability to support the planes and systems, but could not stop the Soviets from paying to have a look. As a result, the Soviets no doubt were finally able to get a closer look at the AIM-54 and AN/AWG-9 systems. Yet by the time the Soviet Union would be ready to deploy a new generation of air-to-air missiles, the US Navy would retire the AWG-9 and AIM-54 in favor of a new generation of more sophisticated missiles and systems coming into deployment. The Phoenix missile was an obsolete system, replaced by the AMRAAM. Perhaps the NR-1′s mission allowed the Navy ten years of security, but ultimately, the world and the pace of technological advance would march on.

41 posted on 05/03/2019 2:46:25 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: Can't control their emotions. Can't control their actions. Deny them control of anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

What a story. Thanks for posting it.


42 posted on 05/03/2019 3:18:41 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It was an exciting day. I was the tactician in an S-3A Viking tracking a Libyan submarine. We had it dead to rights and only waited for the order to sink it. Instead, with the hot action overhead, we were ordered to beat feet for Sigonella Sicily.


43 posted on 05/03/2019 3:24:06 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

As I recall, the original specification engine did not pan out. The amazing thing about the Tomcat is that it was officially underpowered.


44 posted on 05/03/2019 4:53:00 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

So were Air Force. My favorite was at Travis, circa 1972. A pair of stock P-51s (1 D & 1 H) did a high-speed ground-level flyby.

The D ended in a climbing chandelle. The H went vertical.


45 posted on 05/03/2019 4:57:39 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
The horizontal stabilizers were slanted down to improve stabilizer effectiveness when supersonic. The wingtips were canted up to improve lateral (roll) stability.

During flight test, the USN wanted McDonnell Douglas to increase the wing dihedral by 3 degrees. However, McDonnell Douglas had already built the manufacturing tooling. Canting the wing tips 11 degrees at the wing fold had the same effect.

46 posted on 05/03/2019 5:19:48 PM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FtrPilot

Since they have an add on look, I’ll still go with remedial.

I can’t remember this kind of stuff on to many planes.

The F16 has those two fins in back but they aren’t as drastic as the F4.


47 posted on 05/03/2019 6:08:04 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

It was an interesting time...it seems so long ago now...:)


48 posted on 05/03/2019 7:43:30 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: Can't control their emotions. Can't control their actions. Deny them control of anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: YogicCowboy
If you are into the technicals of this, you might find it interesting...if not, just skip it...:)

When I got into my A7 squadron, they were still flying the A-7B Cosair which had a TF-30 engine in it, and was considered on the low side for performance in the A-7.

That was the same engine that was used in the Tomcat, and was basically not a fighter engine, but a bomber engine, so it didn't perform the same way (responsiveness-wise) that they would expect a fighter engine to respond. I believe the same engine was used in the F-111 (engines were designed for the F-111) and was subject to the same issues.

The F-14D had the GE F110 engine which was apparently pretty good, and made the plane truly awesome.

When we upgraded our A-7B Corsairs to A-7E Corsairs, it used a Rolls Royce-Detroit Diesel Allison TF-41 engine which gave improved performance, but had issues with turbine blade cracks. It was a higher bypass turbofan engine, and because of the turbine crack issue, the engine used a thermocouple-limit mechanism (a governor on the temperature at the outlet of the turbines (EGT) so if the temperature got too hot it would cause the engine to lose power and reduce the temperature or keep it steady. That helped with minimizing the turbine cracks.

As an aside, the TF-41 engine was also used in the Royal Navy F-4 Phantoms which they flew into the 1990's.

Every x amount of flying hours (maybe 500, I don't remember exactly) we had to remove a fuel nozzle and feed an optical borescope into the combustion can, feed it back to the turbine, and examine the turbine blades individually for cracks. One person would operated the borescope and examine the blades, and at their command, someone else would give a turn to the turbine with a giant ratchet wrench attached to the gearbox so more blades could be examined.

We had a guy who fed the borescope in a little too far, and when he told the guy to advance the blades, it simply chopped off the end of the optical borescope. Someone once told me those borescopes cost something like $50K-75K in 1970's money!

My last job before I got out was to work with Detroit Diesel Allison to install an Inflight Engine Condition Monitoring System (IECMS) which was a new thing for combat planes at that time. We were a pioneering squadron. Detroit Diesel Allison specially installed all kinds of sensors on the engine, and figured out how to write them to a recording tape (a metal cube about 3 inches to a side) so they could try to predict in advance when a plane might be developing problems that could result in a loss of an engine. They recorded exhaust gas temps (EGT) vibration, airspeed, RPM, throttle position, altitude, and so on.

When every flight came back and landed on the ship, I had to be there to pull out the big heavy recording tapes, put a fresh one in, and record and manually reset any alarm flags on a analog visual indicator.

The parachute riggers made me a special bandolier for the flight deck that I could carry six of the tape cartridges in.

I then took the tapes down to a special compartment, hooked them up to a Digital PDP-11 computer, download them and make a special paper tape record of the flight (it was so primitive by today's standards, it was a roll of tape maybe an inch wide, and as you transferred it to the tape it made a pattern of holes in the paper roll of tape that could be played back!

I had a special program where, if I saw any issues, I could choose the appropriate parameters in the program that would best display the issue, set the axis correct to best display them on a paper graph, print it out and give it to the maintenance officer and the Detroit Diesel Allison representative.

For example, if a vibration flag was triggered in the plane, I would read the tape, select the RPM, EGT Vibration level from the appropriate sensor and throttle position, then plot and print them.

It was very heady stuff then. Of course, all of this is completely standard on all military aircraft now I presume, but in the late 1970's...it was pretty cool.

Here is a link to a technical article, and shows a depiction of my squadron's plane at the time (1978): A-7E/TF41 Engine Conditioning Monitoring System

Funny...as I used a command line interface to enter the parameters, you would occasionally mistype something, and it would spit back "PARAMETER INCORRECT-REENTER PARAMETER"

One day, I kept reentering the wrong thing and after the fourth or fifth time, the program spit back "PARAMETER INCORRECT-ARE YOU IN THE US MARINES?"

When I got it wrong again, it said "PARAMETER INCORRECT-WHAT IS ON THE END OF YOUR ARMS SHITFINGERS?

As I continued to deliberately make mistakes, it spit back ever increasing obscene and abusive responses to my mistakes! I thought it was hilarious!

Someone, somewhere had a sense of humor!

49 posted on 05/03/2019 8:34:54 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: Can't control their emotions. Can't control their actions. Deny them control of anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Interesting times, eh Jacquerie?


50 posted on 05/03/2019 8:36:06 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: Can't control their emotions. Can't control their actions. Deny them control of anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I was on the Big E 73/74.

Welders cut through a bulkhead into the tape storage room.

Firefighters then ran into the computer room and sprayed down everythin with salt water.


51 posted on 05/03/2019 9:03:11 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Well there’s some real life for you right there. It ain’t like the movies.


52 posted on 05/03/2019 9:16:09 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
oh HELL yeah!!!
53 posted on 05/03/2019 9:31:29 PM PDT by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
newer yes, more expensive, most definitely, cooler? no...
54 posted on 05/03/2019 9:34:34 PM PDT by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Wow! What a mess that must have been...


55 posted on 05/03/2019 11:29:18 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: Can't control their emotions. Can't control their actions. Deny them control of anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Chode

That was my screen saver for a long time!


56 posted on 05/03/2019 11:31:20 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: Can't control their emotions. Can't control their actions. Deny them control of anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: YogicCowboy

I went to an airshow at Travis. As I crawling my way to the parking area a B1 bomber flew over head shaking the car as its four engines roared. I liked that show as they had a lot of vintage jets including a MIG-17 and Hawker Hunter. A C17 put on an impressive performance showing off its STOL capability.


57 posted on 05/04/2019 4:13:24 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

i can see why


58 posted on 05/04/2019 9:10:18 AM PDT by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Great story.....the things we do for love and an awesome sea story!


59 posted on 05/06/2019 8:15:19 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angles will sing for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DFG

That movie is such a guilty pleasure for me...it is so corny, but...I still enjoy watching it!

There was an interesting side to that, when shooting that scene, one of the Tomcats got a lot closer to the water than anyone had intended it to!

No heads rolled, though...


60 posted on 05/06/2019 8:53:44 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: Can't control their emotions. Can't control their actions. Deny them control of anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson