PinGGG!....................
“a substance mimicking life, but not life”
—
Democrats on Mars.
It’s beginning to sound like Mars may be the perfect place to relocate all Mooslimbs.
It’s funny how, when you read the story, it belies the headline.
I remember this!
There’s been hints from other sources too
I can’t believe NOBODY has posted a picture on this thread of the Looney Tunes Bugs Bunny Martian character.
“There should be an Earth Shattering Boom”
NASA secretly sent up to Mars via Mars Lander, a life size inflatable doll of Obama. Once it was inflated , it was promptly sodomized and deflated.
This is proof beyond doubt that there is life on Mars. And also the reason that the Dems have not said much about it.
The Viking spacecraft had an experiment to determine if there was, or had been, microbial life. It came back positive but NASA discounted the results.
I think it would be cool if we found the ruins of an ancient civilization on Mars. I bet we’d send some people there el pronto, then!
You have to read reports in a number of the links in the article to get past the innuendo in the article to what was and was not discovered.
1. The scientific standard is met when a finding can be reproduced independent from a previous test. In 1970 case they weren’t, so they don’t stand as “proof”.
2. In 2018 what was found was “organic compounds”. What is an organic compound? It is any of a large class of chemical compounds in which one or more atoms of carbon are covalently linked to atoms of other elements, most commonly hydrogen, oxygen, or nitrogen.
3. What was found in 2018 was believed to be from material that was dated to about 3 billion years ago. At most what it might mean was that some kind of life, producing or made of “organic compounds” may have been present on Mars 3 billion years ago. That 2018 finding is not evidence of life on Mars today.
Please pass the tin foil hat
I got to see both Viking launches from KSC, and, briefly met Dr. Gerald Soffen, lead scientist on the Viking Mission. Straight up guy. If they had seriously found any signs of life on Mars, he would have said so. They did have some inconclusive results, but, if it had been worth exploring further by those methods, he would have seen that it happened.
A brief article about him. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Soffenvv
Thanks Red Badger and BenLurkin.
 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
| Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar · | ||
“NASA couldn’t duplicate the results in their laboratory”
How do you duplicate the results in a laboratory on Earth? I don’t get it. I don’t think they ever had a Mars sample-return mission or is that wrong? Seems like you need Martian soil.
Freegards