Posted on 12/10/2019 12:51:53 PM PST by LibWhacker
A popular international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen says that unless the world takes more unified action to fight climate change, we may need an armed intervention. Yes, Ole Wæver is suggesting that if we don’t get in line with the climate change hysteria the media is pushing, armed invasions may be the only solution.
“At some point this whole climate debate is going to tip over,” he tells RN’s Late Night Live.
“The current way we talk about climate is one side and the other side. One side is those who want to do something, and the other is the deniers who say we shouldn’t do anything.”
Wæver believes that pro-climate hysteria politicians man soon need to react more harshly as a way to appease their constituents who will seek more forceful conflicts with “climate deniers.”
The professor’s claim to climate change fame began when he coined the phrase, “securitisation,” which implies that climate change threatens democracy as we know it. And according to him, that should mean war.
“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.
“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”
In other words, the world according to Ole Wæver is better off in a state of war, whereas nuclear threat potential exists alongside certain human and animal casualties, is the only way forward to save the climate. By flying warplanes and fighter jets, dispersing massive warships, and annihilating croplands with shrapnel, we can progressively make the world a better place to breath air. Wars notoriously lead to increased chaos in sub-Saharan nations where warmongers tend to thrive beyond the bombs. And typically, refugee numbers around the world surge as people are displaced by armed conflicts.
But it should all save the environment. If we put enough “climate deniers” in front of firing squads, we can all move forward and continue living in a world of lavish private planes, SUVs, and paper cups.
Liberals are appropriating Islam’s methods for defending the ideology. Hate the unbeliever, death to the proud infidel.
I gots me a question for Mr Ole Whatever. When was the last time Denmark took any successful military action? With him living in a veritable hotbed of military incompetence, what gives him the basis for recommending military action of any kind?
OK, two questions.
Gaia Worshippers are Leftists and Yurps overwhelmingly.
War? Don’t make me laugh.
I say, start with mooselimb countries.
It is a twofer.
Let the good professor mobilize his armies, and invade!
Mass insanity.
war against China and India?
Denmark be my guest.
Mighty bold talk for a guy from a country which lasted a whole four hours against a German invasion in the spring of 1940 . . .
What does this idiot intend to do, hire us to fight ourselves?
There some who would do just that!
Won’t work because climate change activists are snowflakes and would run at the sight of a gun.
The Ecofacists want control and are at war with free peoples.
The Chinese must be laughing at the stupidity of such Western self-delusion and destruction. We’re hobbled in an economic war by carbon silliness.
The last time Denmark took part in a war they surrendered in 6 hours. I suspect we can beat that record.
“At some point this whole climate debate is going to tip over,” he tells RN’s Late Night Live.
You mean, like Guam?
Good gosh you “intellectuals” are so smart
Uh, yeah. Butt, being the hippo-critters they are, guess raising the temp by shootin’ all us ‘denialists/climalarkeists’ is okee dokee?
War leaves a huge carbon footprint and deeply scars Mother Earth. That idiot professor knows it too. Details and inconsistencies don’t matter to the enviro-Nazis.
Yeah, my thoughts exactly. Maybe even, “Bring it on cream-puff”.
Before you start the war remember us deniers have all the weapons and millions of rounds of ammunition waiting to pop your sorry asses.
Bring it, MFer.
“I’d just like to point out that making and maintaining good weapons is usually a carbon-dioxide generating activity.
Not to mention the amount of petrochemicals that are used in the manufacture of both weapons and munitions.
Good! Will kill you sonofabitches and then we won't have to listen to your lying crap anymore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.