Posted on 04/30/2020 6:55:23 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson
Special Dispatch to the New-York Times. CHARLESTON, Saturday, April 28. The darker the day, the darker the deed. A tremendous and windy storm has prevailed both inside and outside of the Convention. Prayer has been dispensed with, though the same cannot be said of imprecation.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
First session: November 21, 2015. Last date to add: Sometime in the future.
Reading: Self-assigned. Recommendations made and welcomed.
Posting history, in reverse order
To add this class to or drop it from your schedule notify Admissions and Records (Attn: Homer_J_Simpson) by reply or freepmail.
The Charleston Convention exposes as Confederate propaganda that the Civil War was sparked by Lincoln’s aggressiveness. The anti-Douglas groups knew with certainty that any split among the Democrats would guarantee the Republicans winning the election. (As it was, Lincoln won a majority of electoral votes, but the discord among the Democrats might have cost them Pennsylvania; you can also see the plain unionist Democrat sympathy in the New York Times, here.) Yet even as Douglas won clear majority after clear majority of the vote, the insurrectionists denied him his victory, because he was too moderate. They wanted war, and a Lincoln victory would give them the pretext.
Within the year, Lincoln would withdraw union forces from most Deep-Southern army bases; his last troops dug in at Charleston, awaiting rescue to the North... and there they were attacked without provocation.
Sounds like the Dem party of the 19th century was no different than the Dem party of the 21st century.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.