[SkyDancer]

Spent three and a half days at a Shroud seminar hosted by noted scientist that concluded it could not be a 14th. century fraud. There is no way people back then had the science to produce something like the Shroud (biological or artistically).

What do you see? A smudge. You have to stand back 13 to 18 feet to see any image and that image is a negative image something not known in their day; secondly in a painting or drawing the closer you get to an image the sharper it becomes. The closer you get to the Shroud image it just becomes smudges.

The Shroud also possesses photographic-negative properties first discovered in 1898, that on the “positive image” clearly show every gruesome, agonizing, torment endured by the “man.” Additionally, the Shroud displays three-dimensional “distance information” resembling a topographical map but within the cloth’s two-dimensional image of the man.

The Shroud also possesses photographic-negative properties first discovered in 1898, that on the “positive image” clearly show every gruesome, agonizing, torment endured by the “man.” Additionally, the Shroud displays three-dimensional “distance information” resembling a topographical map but within the cloth’s two-dimensional image of the man.

There's lots more including the fact that the dating source was taken from a repair made in the 14th. century and not the actual Shroud itself.

[Phillyred]

correct. The shroud has supernatutal properties.

[TexasGator]

“There’s lots more including the fact that the dating source was taken from a repair made in the 14th. century and not the actual Shroud itself.”

Documentation states samples were taken from repair-free areas.