My Own Short Article: No Need 2 Disavow QAnon

[Uncompliant]

I think something like this should get out to the President and Repubs in general. I think the QAnon question gets asked again at the next "debate." Whether you like or dislike Q and the Qanons, he/they are our guys. The President should have some ammunition to escape the "do you disavow" trap. If you like, send it around to whomever. Feel free to rewrite if you don't like my phrasing. My first post, so sorry if this posts wrong or badly.

[Uncompliant]

QAnon: What's to Disavow?

At her staged and scripted propaganda extravaganza misnamed as a "Town Hall," Savannah Guthrie asked President Trump to disavow QAnon. I was puzzled (okay, I was hopping mad!). What was there to disavow?

This was Guthrie's statement to PT defining QAnon: “QAnon is a theory that Democrats are a Satanic pedophile ring & you are their savior. — Will you disavow?"

Breaking down her definition, according to Guthrie, QAnon has four political/social positions: (1) QAnon dislikes Democrats, (2) opposes Satanists, (3) hates pedophiles and (4) likes President Trump. What's to disavow? President Trump either agrees with or aligns with these four QAnon positions. President Trump dislikes Democrats, opposes Satanists, hates pedophiles and certainly likes himself.

Now, possibly Guthrie wanted PT to disavow QAnon because Guthrie thinks it is not true that Democrats are a Satanic pedophile ring. But, how do we know for sure? At the first debate, Joe Biden boldly proclaimed that "I am the Democratic Party." Biden is also a pedophile. There are dozens, if not scores, of photos and videos of Biden sniffing and fondling little girls in public. By logic and induction, we can infer that much worse has occurred behind closed doors.

Further, I have never heard Joe Biden ever disavow or denounce Satan, Lucifer or the Church of Satan. As such, I hereby demand that Biden disavow Satan! (Honestly, I have no idea how Biden would respond to such a demand for disavowal. But it might be cosmically comical.)

Maybe this line of attack is not politically expedient. However, stating the Truth that Bide is a pedophile might be a political killshot. In any event, there is no reason to disavow an organization that is dedicated to researching and uncovering the truth about Satanic pedophile rings. Attacking political opponents is the purpose of political and social organizations.

With respect to other reasons for disavowing QAnon, the proper response should be: "Prove it!" QAnon is accused of encouraging violence. Prove it! QAnon supports the Second Amendment -- just like PT-- but supporting the 2A is not even close to encouraging violence. QAnon seems to be "miliary" of some sort. President Trump supports our military and veterans. QAnon is supposedly a white supremacist organization. Prove it! I've never seen a post that could remotely be seen as racist or white supremacist. Finally, QAnon is supposedly a domestic terrorist organization. Again, prove it! This is the trickiest politically. The response is likely: "The FBI has labeled QAnon as a domestic terrorist organization." This was purposeful done to allow just this line of questing directed at the President and Republicans. In my view, the most politically expedient response is: "The FBI is not always right. More information is needed." Same response to the fact that House passed a resolution. "The House may have acted hastily."

One additional point: demands that one publicly disavow is a demand for obedience. These are demands that President obey, OBEY! These are demands that the President engage in rituals of compliance and protocols of humiliation.

[AU72]

There is Q and there are anons.
There is no QAnon.

[kevao]

He should paraphrase Biden: QAnon is an idea, not an organization!

[TheZMan]

IBTZ

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Let’s just disavow free speech for anybody who isn’t a Left-wing extremist.

Oh wait! We’ve already done that!

[TheZMan]

:P Someone’s been keeping up.

[Paladin2]

There is almost no there there.

As opposed to Auntie Queefa.

[Paladin2]

“...The FBI is not always right...”

The Fey Wray and his FIB minions have been shown to be Domestic Terrorists and projectionists of the wurst order.

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

Before you go...

https://freerepublic.com/donate/

[newmomster]

posted your four points on twitter - we’ll see what happens!

[Honorary Serb]

I don’t even know what “QAnon” is!!!! Phooey, anyway!

[humblegunner]

You seem to have missed the supposition that all democrats
and most republicans are imagined to be a part of this
evil, Satanic, baby-killing and adrenochrome-banging
group of naughty folks running the world and that they
have secret tunnels full of little Haitian kids that
they chop up and eat and sometimes spank in recently drained
swimming pools.

That’s a long way from opposing pedophiles.

Quite a distance in fact.

[montag813]

At least 37 dead at the hands of Antifa/BLM over the past 4 months.

Media CRICKETS.

What's the QAnon death count? ONE? And I think even that is disputed.

[CheshireTheCat]

The problem is that the enemy reads Q posts, of course. Why wouldn’t they? They know that asking about Qanon versus Q gave Trump an out.

I think this time they will ask Trump about Q versus QAnon— if they are ready to, if they deem it to be in their interest.

They may deem it to be in their interest. It’s hard to tell. We still have four days of news and developments between now and then.

And they may fall into a trap if they ask the question.

Whatever. I’m sure Trump and the Q team have wargamed how they think he should respond and Trump is going to say what Trump is going to say.

If it were me, I would make the point that the Left is so afraid of something they call a kooky conspiracy theory that they took all the YouTube channels of Q followers down and ask why they would do that instead of encouraging people to go to the channels and see how kooky the Q stuff is for themselves and have a good laugh.

I might name a couple of the people who had these Q channels, such as X22 Report, Praying Medic, RedPill 78, IPOT, and mention that now they can be found on Gab, BitChute, etc. and that maybe people should go give them a view and see what it is that the Left thinks is so kooky about them.

[bagster]

You seem to have missed the supposition that all democrats and most republicans are imagined to be a part of this evil, Satanic, baby-killing and adrenochrome-banging group of naughty folks running the world and that they have secret tunnels full of little Haitian kids that they chop up and eat and sometimes spank in recently drained swimming pools.

Once again, you hyperbolically overstate the case to the point of ridiculousness so that you can call the truth ridiculous.

Whoever said anything about 'all democrats and most republicans'? Its not all. Its never all. In order to achieve lasting power and ascend to the pinnacle, however, there are dues to pay and dirt to provide. Just like Hollywood. Remember Weinstein? This latest Hunter Biden thing is an illustration of that very concept. Epstein and NXIVM are others.

Adrenochrome is a thing and Haitian children were trafficked.

There is a 'cabal' of so-called 'elites' running the world.

I know these things are scary to accept HG, but the sooner you take the blinders off, the less scared you'll be and you can begin to be a voice that will end the deep state's influence and put an end to their evil practices.

Joining forces with the New York Times, Obama, and House Democrats in fighting Q makes you less than the good guy that I know you see yourself as.

#ThesePeopleAreSick

[bitt]

pretty damn good for a newbie!

[MileHi]

Wow, that’s bad.

And you have a link, right?

[humblegunner]

Once again, you hyperbolically overstate the case to the point of ridiculousness

Negative, I quote your own Qtard cabal and you know it.

There is a 'cabal' of so-called 'elites' running the world.

Then they ain't doing much a good job of it.
Y'all say both Bush's were globalists. Well, they were both
presidents so where at is that global government? It just kind
of didn't happen like some biscuits in a cold oven?

I want to see a reckoning of all the loony Qtard stuff like the tunnels
and the time travel and the missiles and a dozen other things.

You don't get to be wrong on 90% of stuff and still claim credibility.

Although I'm sure that all those things are actually true in Q-land.

Q is Poo and so are you.

[null and void]

"The FBI has labeled QAnon as a domestic terrorist organization."

Eh? The FBI? The same FBI that sat on Hunter's hard drive for a year? That FBI?

Welcome to FR, BTW...

Pay no attention to the people who think you should be zotted.

Their aim is poor...

[bagster]

Negative, I quote your own Qtard cabal and you know it.

No you don't and you know it. You did it again in this very post. See below.

Then they ain't doing much a good job of it. Y'all say both Bush's were globalists. Well, they were both presidents so where at is that global government? It just kind of didn't happen like some biscuits in a cold oven?

Both Bushes were globalist and derp state actors. Everything they did was in furtherance of the deep state. From dismantling Reaganism to invading Iraq. Its almost like you haven't been paying attention. Hillary was supposed to finish off their '16 year plan' and complete the total and complete takeover and control of the USA.

They never thought she would lose, and now The Donald (with his Q program) are attempting to dismantle them.

I want to see a reckoning of all the loony Qtard stuff like the tunnels and the time travel and the missiles and a dozen other things.

Oh, you will. Stay tuned. But what does time travel have to do with Q? Show me where Q uttered one word about time travel please. This is another example of you tossing in the ridiculous to make it all ridiculous. There's a term for that I just learned. 'Nutpicking'. Taking the nuttiest stuff and painting everybody with that brush. You are a nutpicking Texican.

The missiles are real. There is even photographic evidence. You can go over the 'dozens of other thing' piece by piece and I'll set you straight as to whether Q posted that stuff or some goof anon conjectured it. School is in session.

You don't get to be wrong on 90% of stuff and still claim credibility.

Making up numbers doesn't bolster your case. Has Q been wrong? Sure. Who hasn't. These people are human and the derps are fighting back hard. [Trust Wray] is an example of Trump and Q's being wrong. But 90 percent? Hardly.

More like 99 percent right.

Although I'm sure that all those things are actually true in Q-land.

Most everything Trump's Q program has posted about is actually true. You'll see that one day.

Why would any patriot want it not to be?

Q is Poo and so are you.

I may be, but its not about me you countrified bumpkin.