Yes, you are
Posted on 04/08/2021 11:16:55 AM PDT by yelostar
You should be ashamed of yourself insisting that people follow your agenda instead of being vaccinated
You are not qualified to comment. You are quite simply the propagandist as you must have people agree with you regardless of how incorrect you are.
Most died of organ failure. It is important to note that the trials were fine during and post injection. The failure happened when the animals were challenged by the natural virus, this is why none of the programs were allowed to proceed.
I am fearful that our vaccination program may be setting millions upon millions of ticking time bombs.
I pray I am wrong, but if one were so inclined to reduce the human population, and get away with it, what better way than to inject the masses with something that is benign, but once introduced to something in the wild, becomes deadly.
walkingdead wrote:
I also noticed the nice change they made under vaccine in the dictionary. Quite frankly, until this last year, mRNA was not a vaccine, by definition. Funny what you can get done without most people noticing.
Yes, I saw that too. Was changed in 2020 if I recall.
The ministry of Truth is busily at work covering for the pharmaNazis.
1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
SS1
Yes, you are
It might it could. Blah blah blah
Show me where there is reverse reverse transcriptase OR where this is a retrovirus otherwise you sre one of the fear mongering antivaxx zealots.
And once you learn that An adverse effect may be not related to the vaccine we can talk. Of course muscle soreness is an adverse effect. Sorry that you are merely a mouthpiece for the antiscience crowd
i realize you are not educated in this subject.
your latest stupid lie is that mRNA DOES enter
the nucleus when polyadenylated. YOU repeatedly
show you know nothing. Get an education at least, phony.
you have repeatedly lied on this forum on almost every
thread purporting that these DNA operating nanomachines
[”vaccines”] are safe and have been tested for oncogenicity.
you and the other BIG PHARMA and DS shills need a
warning label to distinguish you, for the newbies.
As noted prior, COVID-19 threads have a significant signal to noise ratio.
There’s enough information out there for each person to make a data informed decision.
But at the end of the day, it is each person’s decision. And FReepers need to accept that.
Some of the worst offending issues are 1) mask wearing and 2) vaccines.
Good grief, people. Don’t get so wrapped around the axle that others don’t see COVID-19 issues the same as you or don’t make the same decisions as you.
Unfortunately, there are FReepers on both sides that seem to not only disagree with the “other sides” but also antagonize and make the issues personal with insults and threats. A flame war erupts, rendering the thread essentially useless.
Provide references for your positions and argue as politely as possible.
That’s all you can do.
Oh good grief....
I know you are, but what am I?
Give me a break...
Will you admit that the JnJ vaccine uses a gene therapy approach? (Fact)
—if not you aren’t interested in truth as much as you are your “safe and effective” narrative.
I know you are, but what am I?
Give me a break...
Will you admit that the JnJ vaccine uses a gene therapy approach? (Fact)
—if not you aren’t interested in truth as much as you are your “safe and effective” narrative.
You should be ashamed for misleading these brilliant people. Next thing you know you will be saying that my cousin’s grandmother’s run in with hantavirus wasn’t caused by her Jelly Belly addiction. I hear Big Sugar and the anti-rodent cabal pay better than Big Pharma. Might want to look into it as long as you’re sharing “science”.
There hasn't been enough time for such trials with the mRNA vaccines. The irony is that the exact mechanism by which these vaccines work is far better understood than most drugs developed using traditional methods.
Will there be adverse reactions? Of course, as with any medication, including already approved vaccines. But there is already very good statistical evidence that any incidence of serious side effects is not outside the bounds of approved medications.
The only legitimate objection is whether the vaccine risks exceed the benefits from what is not, in the overwhelming majority of cases, a serious disease. COVID is simply a bad flu, about 4 to 5 times worse than regular flu for those vulnerable to it, but about 1/4 to 1/5 as deadly as the 1918 flu. The vaccine is probably not worth the risk for many seen on an individual basis, but may be justified on a societal basis. Like flu vaccine these should be highly recommended for the older and more vulnerable portion of the population. But outlandish claims of side effects are nonsense.
I read somewhere (fear porn, no doubt) that some nation with bio-war capability and evil intent could potentially tailor a disease to attack the mRNA antibodies, or whatever, to cause genocide-level body counts here in the U.S. of A.
And this to combat a virus with a 99.7% survival rate?
Risk versus reward comes into play here, methinks. Everybody seems to be pushing and shoving toward the door marked Vaccinate Now and that gives me pause.
Yes, i understand.
So now they’re airbrushing stuff INTO the pictures.
More anti-vaxxer pseudo-scientific crapulence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.