Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What a Perfect Gravitational Lens
Universe Today ^ | 8/30/2021 | NANCY ATKINSON

Posted on 09/02/2021 5:49:21 PM PDT by LibWhacker

What a Perfect Gravitational Lens

A stunning new photograph from the Hubble Space Telescope shows a nearly perfect Einstein Ring, an effect caused by gravitational lensing. This is one of the most complete Einstein Rings ever seen.

Gravitational lenses occur when a massive object, such as a galaxy, is aligned directly between Earth and another massive object even farther away. Einstein predicted that gravity could bend light, and this image is a wonderful example of how gravity from foreground objects causes a deflection of light from background objects, forming a ring of light.

In this case, it’s not just one foreground galaxy and one background galaxy, but the gravity from two massive galaxies bending the light from a distant quasar, focusing the otherwise divergent light into a visible ring.

So why does this image show several points of light?

Video of this Einstein Ring. Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, T. Treu , Acknowledgment: J. Schmidt
Music: Stellardrone – Stardome

As you can see, clustered at the center of this image are six luminous spots of light, four of them forming a circle around a central pair. Hubble data also indicates that there is a seventh spot of light in the very center, which is a rare fifth image of the distant quasar. This rare phenomenon is caused by the presence of two galaxies in the foreground that act as a lens.

The Hubble team says that the central pair of galaxies in this image are genuinely two separate galaxies. The four bright points circling them, (and the fainter one in the very center, which is really hard to see) are actually five separate images of the single distant quasar, called 2M1310-1714.

The two foreground galaxies have such an enormous amount of mass that they cause the fabric of space to warp such that the light travelling through that space from a distant object is bent and magnified in such a way that the image shows multiple magnified images of the far-away source.

Our friend and colleague, Dr. Pamela Gay, loved this image too:

“This spectacular image was captured by Hubble’s Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3), which was installed on Hubble in 2009 during Hubble Servicing Mission 4, Hubble’s final servicing mission. The WFC3 was intended to operate until 2014, but 12 years after it was installed it continues to provide both top-quality data and fantastic images, such as this one,” says the Hubble Team.



TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: galaxy; gravitational; lens; quasar

1 posted on 09/02/2021 5:49:21 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Some smart guy answer me this;
Anything with mass can not go the speed of light,
Photons therefore should have no mass.
Gravity only acts upon things that have mass.

Trick question, we don’t know.
before all the Liberals and politicians spout off
about “settled science”
I think we had better be very thoughtful.


2 posted on 09/02/2021 6:11:16 PM PDT by rellic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

We are wondrously made.


3 posted on 09/02/2021 6:14:31 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellic
Gravity acts on everything, even spacetime itself, and the light with it.

4 posted on 09/02/2021 6:18:20 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
Gravity acts on everything, even spacetime itself, and the light with it.

Especially after you hit 70.

5 posted on 09/02/2021 6:19:54 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

Yes. Iv’e read Hawkins books. My point was more to comment on “Settled science” when we really don’t know squat.


6 posted on 09/02/2021 6:28:01 PM PDT by rellic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

ta dum


7 posted on 09/02/2021 6:37:54 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I see four lumps of white light around the ring (images of the galactic bulge?) and three of them are grouped in about a 150 degree arc. So one side has three times as much as the other side and the one on top is seemingly much smaller than the other three. There is a serious maldistribution of images. The big white images are all in their own neighborhood and don't want the smaller image around them. This clearly implies racism!

Some people can find racism anywhere! Black holes matter!

8 posted on 09/02/2021 7:10:41 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

Gravity always wins.


9 posted on 09/02/2021 7:27:10 PM PDT by Roadrunner383
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Awesome photos...


10 posted on 09/02/2021 7:27:21 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Aren’t they putting a new telescope into space? I heard this one will travel away from earth to get a deeper view of the universe. That’s going to be wild. They just may find that the universe IS larger than Obamas ego.


11 posted on 09/02/2021 7:45:09 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

Gravity sucks


12 posted on 09/02/2021 8:01:42 PM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rellic

Light is tricky in that it acts as both a particle - photon - and a wave.

Personally I have come to believe that particles are merely vibrational waves that are moving at such a high frequency that the waveform condenses into mass.

The conversion of mass to energy is a really just a disruption of the higher frequency’s waveform where a portion is converted to a lower frequency - energy and the remainder (ash left from a flame for example - is the portion that is modified but still remains at a higher frequency and in a material form.

It’s been way to long since I got my Physics degree so I can’t do the math anymore, but I think the idea deals with the niceties of string theory as well as the “missing Mass” of the universe leading to the whole dark matter/dark energy theories.

I also am not convinced by the constancy around the speed of light - I remember when we went through those equations at the time that I didn’t feel the differential equations even considered the potential for variance in C and felt they were oversimplifying the math....but then again I was just trying to pass the courses and it was about the most I could do just to manage that.


13 posted on 09/02/2021 9:33:48 PM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Yes! The James Web Space Telescope. Supposed to launch in a couple of months. Mirror is six times the area of Hubble's. Can't wait!
14 posted on 09/02/2021 10:40:02 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

That circular image can be corrected with computer software to a normal image. It will create images of those exoplanets with great detail.


15 posted on 09/02/2021 10:48:55 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

Not planets, galaxies. The nearest one is 3.8 billion light years away, while the primary one of interest is a quasar clear across the universe.

Yes, it’s going to be absolutely fascinating to see how much detail they’ll be able to see in something that’s that far away! I’m a believer, but man, the quasar is soooo far away (one source said 17 billion light years), it’s kind of hard to believe they’ll be able to see much more than a bright spot. I’ll be happy just to see the galaxy the quasar is part of.


16 posted on 09/02/2021 11:36:59 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The gravitational lens provided by our sun should magnify planets in solar systems that are light years away. This is what Earth would look like (the right hand image) if it was at the distance of Proxima Centauri (4.24 light years away) when projected by the solar gravitational lens: To position the telescope at the sun's gravitational focal point would mean getting out to about 51 billion miles from Earth. The payoff would be immeasurable with images of continents, oceans and cloud formations on planets light years away!
17 posted on 09/03/2021 12:43:19 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Oh wow, thanks! Yes, this is going to turn out to be something mind blowing I think


18 posted on 09/03/2021 6:34:37 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson