Posted on 01/13/2022 9:54:51 PM PST by ransomnote
Paypal is trying to choke off donations going to fund the reporting at DailyExpose.uk (over the target). Prayers up that the DailyExpose will continue to survive Paypal's effort at censorship.
ransomnote: Image on Expose website of fencing around quarantine area.
Unelected health officials in the state of Washington have filed a bill that would involve deploying “strike force” teams to round up and “involuntarily detain” unvaccinated families.
The proposed agenda, called WAC 246-100-040, was revealed during a recent Zoom meeting by the Washington State Board of Health. The bill would amend state law to allow residents as young as five to be detained by the state and sent to Covid-19 quarantine camps.
The proposed revision under Washington’s Communicable and Certain Other Disease Act outlines specific “Procedures for isolation or quarantine” that are incredibly tyrannical and discriminate against unvaccinated people.
A local health officer would be granted power to “issue an emergency detention order causing a person or group of persons to be immediately detained for purposes of isolation or quarantine.”
The bill further states that health officers would need to provide documentation proving that unvaccinated citizens of Washington subject to detention have denied “requests for medical examination, testing, treatment, counselling, vaccination, decontamination of persons or animals, isolation, quarantine and inspection and closure of facilities” before they would be given the thumbs up on sending people to the covid camps.
According to reports, the amendment would also allow health officers to deploy law enforcement to assist with the arrest of Washington residents who fail to comply.
The amendment goes on to provision that “a local health officer may invoke the powers of police officers, sheriffs, constables, and all other officers and employees of any political subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the health department to enforce immediately orders given to effectuate the purposes of this section in accordance with the provisions of RCW 43.20.050(4) and 70.05.120.”
In the event of an “emergency detention order,” isolation and detainment of Washington citizens who do not comply would be allowed “for a period not to exceed ten days.”
Those who continue to refuse treatment or vaccination during the seven-day period could be held “for a period not to exceed thirty days.”
ransomnote: Here's the link text of the proposed quarantine policy:
Link: WAC 246-100-040:
Here's a link to a pdf to download the policy:
Quarantine policy text from that webpage posted below:
PDFWAC 246-100-040
Procedures for isolation or quarantine.
(1) At his or her sole discretion, a local health officer may issue an emergency detention order causing a person or group of persons to be immediately detained for purposes of isolation or quarantine in accordance with subsection (3) of this section, or may petition the superior court ex parte for an order to take the person or group of persons into involuntary detention for purposes of isolation or quarantine in accordance with subsection (4) of this section, provided that he or she:(a) Has first made reasonable efforts, which shall be documented, to obtain voluntary compliance with requests for medical examination, testing, treatment, counseling, vaccination, decontamination of persons or animals, isolation, quarantine, and inspection and closure of facilities, or has determined in his or her professional judgment that seeking voluntary compliance would create a risk of serious harm; and(b) Has reason to believe that the person or group of persons is, or is suspected to be, infected with, exposed to, or contaminated with a communicable disease or chemical, biological, or radiological agent that could spread to or contaminate others if remedial action is not taken; and(c) Has reason to believe that the person or group of persons would pose a serious and imminent risk to the health and safety of others if not detained for purposes of isolation or quarantine.(2) A local health officer may invoke the powers of police officers, sheriffs, constables, and all other officers and employees of any political subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the health department to enforce immediately orders given to effectuate the purposes of this section in accordance with the provisions of RCW 43.20.050(4) and 70.05.120.(3) If a local health officer orders the immediate involuntary detention of a person or group of persons for purposes of isolation or quarantine:(a) The emergency detention order shall be for a period not to exceed ten days.(b) The local health officer shall issue a written emergency detention order as soon as reasonably possible and in all cases within twelve hours of detention that shall specify the following:(i) The identity of all persons or groups subject to isolation or quarantine;(ii) The premises subject to isolation or quarantine;(iii) The date and time at which isolation or quarantine commences;(iv) The suspected communicable disease or infectious agent if known;(v) The measures taken by the local health officer to seek voluntary compliance or the basis on which the local health officer determined that seeking voluntary compliance would create a risk of serious harm; and(vi) The medical basis on which isolation or quarantine is justified.(c) The local health officer shall provide copies of the written emergency detention order to the person or group of persons detained or, if the order applies to a group and it is impractical to provide individual copies, post copies in a conspicuous place in the premises where isolation or quarantine has been imposed.(d) Along with the written order, and by the same means of distribution, the local health officer shall provide the person or group of persons detained with the following written notice:NOTICE: You have the right to petition the superior court for release from isolation or quarantine in accordance with WAC 246-100-055. You have a right to legal counsel. If you are unable to afford legal counsel, then counsel will be appointed for you at government expense and you should request the appointment of counsel at this time. If you currently have legal counsel, then you have an opportunity to contact that counsel for assistance.(4) If a local health officer petitions the superior court ex parte for an order authorizing involuntary detention of a person or group of persons for purposes of isolation or quarantine pursuant to this section:(a) The petition shall specify:(i) The identity of all persons or groups to be subject to isolation or quarantine;(ii) The premises where isolation or quarantine will take place;(iii) The date and time at which isolation or quarantine will commence;(iv) The suspected communicable disease or infectious agent if known;(v) The anticipated duration of isolation or quarantine based on the suspected communicable disease or infectious agent if known;(vi) The measures taken by the local health officer to seek voluntary compliance or the basis on which the local health officer determined that seeking voluntary compliance would create a risk of serious harm;(vii) The medical basis on which isolation or quarantine is justified.(b) The petition shall be accompanied by the declaration of the local health officer attesting to the facts asserted in the petition, together with any further information that may be relevant and material to the court's consideration.(c) Notice to the persons or groups identified in the petition shall be accomplished in accordance with the rules of civil procedure.(d) The court shall hold a hearing on a petition filed pursuant to this section within seventy-two hours of filing, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays.(e) The court shall issue the order if there is a reasonable basis to find that isolation or quarantine is necessary to prevent a serious and imminent risk to the health and safety of others.(f) A court order authorizing isolation or quarantine as a result of an ex parte hearing shall:(i) Specify a maximum duration for isolation or quarantine not to exceed ten days;(ii) Identify the isolated or quarantined persons or groups by name or shared or similar characteristics or circumstances;(iii) Specify factual findings warranting isolation or quarantine pursuant to this section;(iv) Include any conditions necessary to ensure that isolation or quarantine is carried out within the stated purposes and restrictions of this section;(v) Specify the premises where isolation or quarantine will take place; and(vi) Be served on all affected persons or groups in accordance with the rules of civil procedure.(5) A local health officer may petition the superior court for an order authorizing the continued isolation or quarantine of a person or group detained under subsections (3) or (4) of this section for a period up to thirty days.(a) The petition shall specify:(i) The identity of all persons or groups subject to isolation or quarantine;(ii) The premises where isolation or quarantine is taking place;(iii) The communicable disease or infectious agent if known;(iv) The anticipated duration of isolation or quarantine based on the suspected communicable disease or infectious agent if known;(v) The medical basis on which continued isolation or quarantine is justified.(b) The petition shall be accompanied by the declaration of the local health officer attesting to the facts asserted in the petition, together with any further information that may be relevant and material to the court's consideration.(c) The petition shall be accompanied by a statement of compliance with the conditions and principles for isolation and quarantine contained in WAC 246-100-045.(d) Notice to the persons or groups identified in the petition shall be accomplished in accordance with the rules of civil procedure.(e) The court shall hold a hearing on a petition filed pursuant to this subsection within seventy-two hours of filing, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. In extraordinary circumstances and for good cause shown, the local health officer may apply to continue the hearing date for up to ten days, which continuance the court may grant at its discretion giving due regard to the rights of the affected individuals, the protection of the public's health, the severity of the public health threat, and the availability of necessary witnesses and evidence.(f) The court shall grant the petition if it finds that there is clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that isolation or quarantine is necessary to prevent a serious and imminent risk to the health and safety of others.(g) A court order authorizing continued isolation or quarantine as a result of a hearing shall:(i) Specify a maximum duration for isolation or quarantine not to exceed thirty days;(ii) Identify the isolated or quarantined persons or groups by name or shared or similar characteristics or circumstances;(iii) Specify factual findings warranting isolation or quarantine pursuant to this section;(iv) Include any conditions necessary to ensure that isolation or quarantine is carried out within the stated purposes and restrictions of this section;(v) Specify the premises where isolation or quarantine will take place; and(vi) Be served on all affected persons or groups in accordance with the rules of civil procedure.(6) Prior to the expiration of a court order for continued detention issued pursuant to subsection (5) of this section, the local health officer may petition the superior court to continue isolation or quarantine provided:(a) The court finds there is a reasonable basis to require continued isolation or quarantine to prevent a serious and imminent threat to the health and safety of others.(b) The order shall be for a period not to exceed thirty days.(7) State statutes, rules, and state and federal emergency declarations governing procedures for detention, examination, counseling, testing, treatment, vaccination, isolation, or quarantine for specified health emergencies or specified communicable diseases, including, but not limited to, tuberculosis and HIV, shall supersede this section.
The virus provided the perfect excuse to the fascists in government to give free rein to their fondest wishes. They were always fascists, but didn’t show it for a long time. Along comes covid, and in 60 seconds they are more fascist than hitler/mussolini.
In other news, I seem to be seeing more Washington plates on vehicles here in Boise.
Thirty days should be enough time for the sheep to shower and one way visit to the cremation ovens.
That is hysterics. We have not experienced anything close to Hitler or Mussolini. It has been my understanding from QBears that Jesus has direct descendants in Abe Lincoln, Patton, JFK and Mussolini (who is not really a bad guy, they say). Since Trump is Mussolini’s nephew, Trump therefore is a direct descendant of Christ. You may want to exclude Mussolini from further comments. 🤔
Let me be clear: a) the law is NOT a moral compass, and b) ANY attempt by so-called 'authorities' to come to my rural place and take a member of my family by force for 'quarantine' will be met with all the deadly force I can muster (and yes, I will have help). Our Founders would NOT have put up with such tyranny.
Forewarned is forearmed.
https://youtu.be/v9UWRy4obyg
IF, and I say IF, this bill passes, you’ll see such an exodus from that state it’ll make the exodus from California look tame.
List of 10 places to never go to.
1. North Korea
2. Cuba
3. Venezuela
4. Washington State
5. California
6. New York
7. China
8. Minnesota
9. Zimbabwe
10. Pakistan
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Washington State to Send Out Strike Teams to “Involuntarily Detain” Unvaccinated Residents and Ship Them to Quarantine Camps [ WAC 246-100-040 ], Robert357 wrote: |
| Did anyone bother to check the links? This is FAKE NEWS. Those changes to the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) were made early in the Covid pandemic. There are some minor housekeeping changes being proposed in Legislation, but that is not what is being discussed. I really hate FAKE NEWS, especially hear at Free Republic. |
*
It's not FAKE NEWS, but by the time you're done distorting it people won't be able to tell. I really hate it when you distort news and falsely claim it's fake.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Washington State to Send Out Strike Teams to “Involuntarily Detain” Unvaccinated Residents and Ship Them to Quarantine Camps [ WAC 246-100-040 ], CatHerd wrote: |
There you go again. “Deflection” “Accusation” You Keep Using Those Words, I Do Not Think They Mean What You Think They Mean. I hardly deflected, as my comment was on point, not about some extraneous subject. I made no accusation. I merely refuted your claim with facts. You countered with your conspiracy theory. No, we aren’t sensitive. You guys are. You are also the ones who appear frantic. If there is ever a serious effort to set up said camps, I’ll break out my torch and pitchfork. Right now, there are no such serious efforts. Have a pleasant evening. |
*
If/when those camps are set up, I fully expect you to become 'communications director' for the Warden.
You distorted the truth with facts and now you want to take a bow? *eye roll*
Your kind is prone to wishing me "Have a Merry CHristmas" or "Have a pleasant evening" as if you are particular about manners. But what about decency? You spend your days trying to lure FReepers into harm's way and want points for etiquette? I don't wish those trying to harm innocent people "Happy" this or "Merry" that.
I see dead people.
Keep spinning it. Try to convince the public “THERE’S NOTHING TO SEE HERE!” Act like this content ends up on the agenda, being tailored for Covid, for no reason at all and anyone who wonders why it was the topic of the zoom - well you just knock yourself out and pretend that they just aren’t as clever as you are.
I really don’t think it matters when this tyrannical law was enacted. The point here is that there are people in that State dicussing using it.
I will help. The law is in effect. The tyrants have a nice little unused vehicle here to start using to threaten, punish and force people.
Democrats are great at going back and finding unused or rarely used laws to advance their tyranny.
Whether they would actually do this we don’t know, but putting it out there has a mental effect on people whether they do it or not.
Buzzkiller. Quit wrecking the fear porn.
I'm not discounting what you are saying. Do you know the date of the zoom call where it was "discussed as being time to put into action"? I would like to watch that particular zoom call. Thanks.
“You distorted the truth with facts”
Pardon my mirth, I can’t help it. This is just too funny. How, pray tell, does one “distort the truth with facts” unless by “truth” you mean whatever conspiracy theory you have running through your head at the moment. Heaven forbid anyone disrupts your conspiracy fantasy with facts.
The facts are:
1. There are no Strike Teams roaming about Washington State to “Involuntarily Detain” Unvaccinated Residents and Ship Them to Quarantine Camps (Notice the over-the-top sensationalism of the headline here? So over the top it would give any sane person pause? No?)
2. No plans to form said Strike Teams were discussed at the Zoom meeting, nor were plans to involuntarily detain unvaccinated residents and ship them to “quarantine camps”.
3. The reason for the Zoom session was to change the language to suit LGBT and AIDS activists, who had been agitating for the language changes, claiming the old terms “stigmatized” AIDS sufferers. It had to be changed per ESHB 1551. (See posts #26 and #32.)
I highly recommend reading the material at that link. There is much there that we Conservatives should be concerned about. Some ought to make us livid. It’s quite a shocking law, and not so much to “reflect modern science” as it to reflect modern political correctness as dictated by the LGBT lobby. Another instance of science corrupted by politics. Why aren’t Washington State Conservatives protesting this?
Instead, here we are arguing over baseless sensationalist claims from a yellow journalism clickbait site run by grifters.
4. Links to the recordings of the Zoom meeting have been posted on this thread. FReepers can watch and listen for themselves and draw their own conclusions.
“Your kind”
My, what a rude and nasty phrase. I suppose by that you mean us “normies” who live “beyond the trees” outside the Q Zoo. Well, at least I’m not a “mudblood” what with being unvaccinated and all.
“You spend your days trying to lure FReepers into harm’s way”
Baseless paranoid accusation. Can you cite even one instance where I have done this? Once again, you resort to fantastical personal attacks because you lack objective facts to back up your argument. Yet you have accused me and others of “making accusations” when we have merely stated facts that conflict with your current conspiracy fantasy. See also: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/projection
“as if you are particular about manners”
Actually, I usually am. I’m a Southern lady, and we just naturally roll that way.
“and want points for etiquette?”
No. I am secure within within my own person and do not require silly things like points. It seems to me, though, that your carrying on and indulging in extended cattiness is a form deflection, another thing you unreasonably accuse others of. Projection again.
“I don’t wish those trying to harm innocent people “Happy” this or “Merry” that.”
Oh my. Again, cite any instance of my “trying to harm innocent people” in a single one of my posts. Ever. Are you still doing that projection thing?
“If/when those camps are set up, I fully expect you to become ‘communications director’ for the Warden.”
If these camps you imagine are ever set up, as one of the unvaxxed, I’ll just be another lowly prisoner behind bars. But again, as per your usual, you engage in baseless insults and personal attacks because the facts are not on your side.
Finally, if you can’t handle having your conspiracy fantasies challenged by facts, I suggest you confine them to your Special Q thread. You won’t have to worry about us “normies” doing that there.
Now this is off-topic, and admittedly could legitimately be considered a distraction, but I am curious: Considering that there have been no Q drops to discuss for over a year now, why do you Q followers still feel the need for your Special Snowflake Q thread?
The date was Jan. 12. For how to watch the Zoom session for yourself, see posts #29 and especially #39 on this thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
