Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pepsionice

And you can go discuss with them the proposed amendment they CURRENTLY want to apply to that rule.

The plandemic was supposed to happen on Hillary CLinton’s watch, so the original was nestled into place in 2013, ready for when she took office.

But they are CURRENTLY trying to amend it for Covid-19.


18 posted on 01/13/2022 10:16:23 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

I was on the zoom call regarding this issue, I think most of the discussion was a distraction except for item 9 on the agenda. Item 9 was replacing references to HIV aids in the original bill with the wording (blood borne pathogens). This would allow Wac 246-100 which was designed to protect the public from aids to be applied to covid. Covid is a respiratory virus but the virus is also carried in the blood stream making it a “blood borne pathogen “ DISCLOSURE I am not a Dr. Or virologist but this is my uneducated opinion on this issue
Stand Tall
Brad


25 posted on 01/13/2022 10:46:42 PM PST by standing man (stand tall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson