I was on the zoom call regarding this issue, I think most of the discussion was a distraction except for item 9 on the agenda. Item 9 was replacing references to HIV aids in the original bill with the wording (blood borne pathogens). This would allow Wac 246-100 which was designed to protect the public from aids to be applied to covid. Covid is a respiratory virus but the virus is also carried in the blood stream making it a “blood borne pathogen “ DISCLOSURE I am not a Dr. Or virologist but this is my uneducated opinion on this issue
Stand Tall
Brad
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Washington State to Send Out Strike Teams to “Involuntarily Detain” Unvaccinated Residents and Ship Them to Quarantine Camps [ WAC 246-100-040 ], standing man wrote: |
I was on the zoom call regarding this issue, I think most of the discussion was a distraction except for item 9 on the agenda. Item 9 was replacing references to HIV aids in the original bill with the wording (blood borne pathogens). This would allow Wac 246-100 which was designed to protect the public from aids to be applied to covid. Covid is a respiratory virus but the virus is also carried in the blood stream making it a “blood borne pathogen “ DISCLOSURE I am not a Dr. Or virologist but this is my uneducated opinion on this issue |
Good post, standing man. I know they are up to something when they deny that such talk means ANYTHING AT ALL.
I think you nailed it - the other similar bill I posted was NYC updating their rules from the same era. I think they were piggy backing on the AIDS agenda intentionally (part of a plan to get people onboard with quarantining).
Then when their efforts are exposed, panic ensues "The Troglodytes think we intended to actually do something with the agenda item/amendment!!!"
They were caving to the AIDS Brigade and the Gaystapo:
Other changes proposed included removing repetitive language and creating clearer definitions.
A few HIV Advocates like Mark Garrett shared their thoughts on the changes to the administrative code.
“This legislation and the proposed rule changes have taken over seven years to accomplish and I think we should all be proud of where we’ve come to,” Garrett said. “We are 1000 percent better in language.”