Pfizer admits in Confidential Documents that its Covid-19 Vaccine may cause Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease; and real-world data now proves it definitely does

Pfizer, the company hit with the largest healthcare fraud settlement and criminal fine to date in 2009; which also happens to be the same company behind the first every mRNA gene therapy injection administered to the general public under emergency use authorisation in the name of Covid-19, has admitted in confidential documents, that it desperately tried to keep from going public, that its Covid-19 mRNA gene therapy may cause Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease.

Since the year 2000, Pfizer have been hit with fines to the amount of at least £7.5 billion, including a single £331.5 million fine for kickbacks and bribery offences, £1.1 billion in fines for false claims offences, and a record breaking individual £1.7 billion fine in 2009 for engaging in fraud by mispromoting a now withdrawn painkiller.

Source

But despite all this the company was still trusted enough by medicine regulators around the world to be granted emerged use authorisation for its experimental Covid-19 injection. Perhaps the company may be incurring some more large fines for kickbacks and bribery offences in the near future?

But we doubt they’ll care much when they made approximately $36 billion dollars in 2021 thanks to Governments worldwide using the hardworking tax payers money to purchase enough doses of their Covid-19 “vaccine” to vaccinate every citizen seven times.

Now, according to confidential documents authored by Pfizer that it wanted to deperately keep secret, the company hasn’t just caused damage to the public purse, it appears it has also caused damage to the publics health, because Pfizer admit that Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is a a very real theoretical risk for its Covid-19 vaccine.

The confidential document titled ‘5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021‘, was submitted by Pfizer-BioNTech as part of its Biological License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA)

Table 5, found on page 11 of the document shows an ‘Important Potential Risk’, and that risk is listed as ‘Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Reporatory Disease (VAERD)’.

Source – Page 11

Pfizer writes in the description section that –

‘an expected rate of VAED is difficult to establish so a meaningful observed / expected analysis cannot be conducted at this point based on available data. The feasibility of conducting such an analysis will be re-evaluated on an ongoing basis as data on the virus grows and the vaccine safety data continues to accrue’.

Considering the fact this document was approved on 30th April 2021, and based on data on adverse reactions received up to 28th Feb 2021, this sentence should concern even the most loyal pharmaceutical worshippers.

In the UK the Pfizer jab was granted emergency use authorisation on the 8th Dec 20, and the first injection was administered the following day. By April 2021, 5 months later, Pfizer was admitting that it did not have a clue if its Covid-19 injections caused VAED, and that they will only know once they have more data.

This confirms in black and white that the general public have been taking part in possibly the largest experiment ever conducted, and it’s an expirement that has made a select few extremely rich.

Pfizer continues in the description section to state –

‘Since the first temporary authorization for emergency supply under Regulation 174 in the UK (01 December 2020) and through 28 February 2021, 138 cases [0.33% of the total PM dataset], reporting 317 potentially relevant events were retrieved.’

What Pfizer is admitting here is that up to 28th Feb 21, 138 people had reported adverse events that were markers of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease.

These markers were limited to –

Standard Decreased Therapeutic Response Search AND PTs Dyspnoea;
Tachypnoea;
Hypoxia;
COVID 19 pneumonia;
Respiratory Failure;
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome;
Cardiac Failure;
Cardiogenic shock;
Acute myocardial infarction; Arrhythmia; Myocarditis;
Vomiting; Diarrhoea; Abdominal pain;
Jaundice;
Acute hepatic failure;
Deep vein thrombosis; Pulmonary embolism;
Peripheral Ischaemia;

Vasculitis;
Shock;
Acute kidney injury; Renal failure;
Altered state of consciousness;
Seizure;
Encephalopathy;
Meningitis;
Cerebrovascular accident;
Thrombocytopenia;
Disseminated intravascular coagulation;
Chillblains;
Erythema multiforme;
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

According to Pfizer those 138 cases reporting 317 VAED relevant events included –

71 incidents in the UK;
25 incidents in the USA;
14 incidents in Germany;
16 incidents in France, Italy, Mexico & Spain (4 each);
3 incidents in Denmark;
and 9 incidents from 9 different countries

Of the 138 cases, 71 were deemed ‘medically significant’ of which 8 were left with serious disabilities Non-fatal / non-life threatening hospitalisation was required for 16 cases of which 1 was left with serious disabilities. 17 cases were deemed life threatening of which 7 were deemed serious for hospitalisation, and 38 cases resulted in death.

At the time of the report which was based on data submitted up to the end of February 2021, apart from the 38 cases that were known to have resulted in death at the time, just a further 26 cases were listed as resolved, with 65 not resolved, 1 not resolved with sequelae, and 8 with unknown outcomes.

Pfizer go on to state in the confidential document that –

‘Of the 317 relevant events, the most frequently reported PTs (≥2%) were: Drug ineffective (135), Dyspnoea (53), Diarrhoea (30), COVID-19 pneumonia (23), Vomiting (20), Respiratory failure (8), and Seizure (7).’

Pfizer concludes in its document that –

‘VAED may present as severe or unusual clinical manifestations of COVID-19. Overall, there were 37 subjects with suspected COVID-19 and 101 subjects with confirmed COVID-19 following one or both doses of the vaccine; 75 of the 101 cases were severe, resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences or death.’

This seems to be an admittance from Pfizer that its vaccine isn’t very good at protecting recipients of its experimental It’s important to remember that these injections do not prevent infection or transmission, they are only supposed to protect against hospitalisation and death. Therefore, with 75 of the 101 confirmed Covid-19 cases being severe (69%), this seems to be an admittance from Pfizer that its vaccine isn’t very good at actually doing that.

Pfizer finishes by stating that –

‘In this review of subjects with COVID-19 following vaccination, based on the current evidence,
VAED/VAERD remains a theoretical risk for the vaccine. Surveillance will continue.’

Here we have Pfizer admitting that Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is a theoretical risk associated with its experimental Covid-19 gene therapy, which has been injected into the arms of hundreds of millions of people around the world several times since December 2020.

There are no appropriate words that could possibly convey how unbelievably stupid and dangerous the decision to give this injection to millions of people, including children was and still is.

The problem Pfizer now has, is that real-world data from various Public Health institutions around the world shows that the risk of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is no longer theoretical, it’s been occurring en masse since at least December 2021.

One example of this is data published by Public Health Scotland which shows that the fully vaccinated are up to 4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated, suggesting Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is to blame.

The following graph shows the age standardised Covid-19 death rates per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status in Scotland. The data has been extracted from table 15, found on page 50 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical report published Wednesday 26th Jan 22.

Source Data – Full Report – Page 50

The highest death-rate in the past month among the fully vaccinated was recorded as 14.05 per 100,000 individuals in the week beginning 8th Jan 22.

But at the same time the rate per 100,000 unvaccinated individuals was recorded as being 10.4. Meaning during this week the fully vaccinated were statistically 1.4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

However, the most concerning figures came in the week beginning 18th Dec 21. During these seven days the death-rate per 100,000 was recorded as 6.55 in the fully vaccinated, but just 1.69 in the unvaccinated. Therefore, during this week the fully vaccinated were statistically 4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the not-vaccinated.

The 4 week average age-standardised death rates per 100,000 individuals equates to 6.2 among the not-vaccinated, but 10 among the fully vaccinated, meaning on average the fully vaccinated have been 1.6 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the not-vaccinated between 18th Dec 21 and 14th Jan 22.

If Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease leading to antibody-dependent enhancement is not to blame for these figures then can somebody please explain what is?

Chris Masterjohn is suggesting it’s either ADE, or viral competition. Either is an ugly outcome

Good 12 minute video in the link. https://chrismasterjohnphd.com/covid-19/2022/01/27/the-pandemic-of-pcr-negative-c-word-like-illness

The Pandemic of PCR-Negative COVID-Like Illness

Disclaimer: I am not a medical doctor and this is not medical advice. My goal is to empower you with information. I will not take a position on whether you should or should not get vaccinated. Please make this decision yourself, consulting sources you trust, including a caring health care professional.

In late October, the CDC had circulated a headline that the COVID vaccines are more than five times as effective as natural immunity. I pointed out that the real story was the hint from this paper that there is a pandemic of PCR-negative “COVID-like illness” hospitalizations that is six times more common in fully vaccinated individuals than in naturally immune individuals.

They had taken a sample of over 200,000 people hospitalized for respiratory failure, pneumonia, trouble breathing, fever, vomiting, or diarrhea, and whittled this down to roughly 7,000 people who had at least two PCR tests more than three months apart who were either fully vaccinated but never-infected or previously infected but never-vaccinated. In this subgroup, 85% of the people were fully vaccinated and 94.4% of them tested negative for COVID.

The remarkable fact that 94.4% of the people hospitalized for COVID-like illness didn’t have COVID should have been the biggest story. The vaccines could be 100% effective against “COVID,” but if all that means is making someone test negative while they are hospitalized for respiratory failure, it is completely meaningless.

What we didn’t know at that time was whether the data looked similar in the big sample of over 200,000 hospitalizations. If they did, then we should have just ceased talking about “COVID” hospitalizations altogether because most hospitalizations for COVID-like illness would not be included in the numbers.

And now we have the bigger dataset. This week’s MMWR provides further evidence for the pandemic of the PCR-negative COVID-like illness.

While the headline is that booster shots were highly effective during both delta and omicron and that “all unvaccinated persons should start vaccination as soon as possible,” we need not look far to see the elephant in the room.

The paper analyzed 222,772 encounters from emergency departments and urgent care centers and 87,904 hospitalizations from 259 hospitals between the end of August and the beginning of January.

Every single person in this study had COVID-like illness, defined as respiratory failure, pneumonia, dyspnea (trouble breathing), vomiting, fever, or diarrhea, and all of them had a PCR test within 14 days before or 3 days after admission. The study was looking at efficacy of mRNA vaccines, so anyone who had gotten the J&J shot was excluded.

Among 222,772 emergency room and urgent care visits for COVID-like illness, 76% tested negative for COVID.

Among 87,904 hospitalizations for COVID-like illness, 79% tested negative for COVID.

The first thing we can say is the vast majority of hospitalizations for COVID-like illness — almost 80% — test negative for COVID.

Among the ER and urgent care visits, the majority (53%) were in the vaccinated (combining partial and full). Among the hospitalizations, the majority (57%) were in the vaccinated (again, combining partial and full).

This study was designed to see whether vaccination status is associated with the likelihood of testing positive if one is sick, not the likelihood that one has gotten sick. As a result, it does not report the underlying vaccination rates in the populations from which the sick people in the study came.

According to Our World in Data, at the mid-point of this study on October 31, the ten states included had vaccination rates ranging from 54% to 75%. These are probably overestimates. They are based on CDC data, which may overestimate the percentage of people vaccinated by up to ten percentage points as a result of misclassifying booster shots as first shots and counting people as being vaccinated from one area when they drove in to get their shot from somewhere else. If we deduct ten percentage points from each state we get 44-65%. Subtracting the roughly 6.5% of vaccinated people who got the J&J from the proportion of vaccinated brings this to 41-61% vaccinated with mRNA vaccines. The 57% of hospitalizations for COVID-like illness that are among the vaccinated falls toward the lower, middle, or higher end of this range depending on how many adjustments we make. Thus, hospitalizations for COVID-like illness seem to fall roughly equally among the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

Deaths are not reported. As such, we have no idea if deaths from COVID-like illness also fall equally among the vaccinated and unvaccinated. We only know that hospitalizations seem to.

When we hear reports about COVID deaths, we have to ask, is this hiding 79% of the deaths from COVID-like illness?

No one is talking about the 79%. It is the pandemic of PCR-negative COVID-like illness.

Among those hospitalized for COVID-like illness, those vaccinated were far less likely to test positive for COVID. Calculating “vaccine efficacy” from this, a third shot of one of the mRNA vaccines was 94% effective against “COVID-19–associated hospitalizations” during the delta-dominant period and 90% effective during the omicron-dominant period.

But “efficacy” means that they helped you get a negative PCR test while you were hospitalized for respiratory failure or other symptoms of COVID-like illness.

The previous study of this sort had found that there were six times more fully vaccinated people hospitalized for COVID-like illness as naturally immune people. This seems to suggest that prior infection actually keeps you out of the hospital, while vaccination just makes you test negative.

What could explain why vaccinated people would be so much less likely to test positive when winding up in the hospital with the same symptoms? I can think of two reasons:

Viral competition. The vaccines make you less likely to get COVID, so you get a different respiratory virus instead.
Antibody-dependent enhancement. The vaccine makes an immune response so strong that you clear the viral RNA from your nose by the time you are tested, but you get a worse inflammatory reaction that gets you hospitalized with the same symptoms.
In order to begin grappling with this, we need to study the 79% of hospitalizations for COVID-like illness that test negative for COVID in greater detail.

What is causing these? A different virus? An inflammatory reaction to a rapidly cleared SARS-CoV-2 infection?

To begin studying this, we must first admit that it exists.

It is the pandemic that no one dare speak of: the pandemic of PCR-negative COVID-like illness

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.