Posted on 02/27/2022 5:26:14 PM PST by Kevmo
Condensed Matter Nuclear Reactions in Nano-Materials
ARPA-E Workshop on Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions October 21-22, 2021
With additional backup slides that weren’t presented at the Workshop.
Workshop presenters with additional details are in “[…]”.
Lawrence P. Forsley
CTO, GEC
Deputy PI, NASA Lattice Confinement Fusion Project
Research Fellow, University of Texas, Austin, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory
lawrence.p.forsley@nasa.gov Co-PI, Naval Surface Warfare Centers
---------------------------------------------------------
Have We Found the Keys to the Kingdom?
• Pd used as a hydrogen gas separator/purifier. [Benyo]
• Has a unique electronic structure: 4d10 <> 4d95s1 : paramagnetic and ferromagnetic states
• Pd will load H/D, e.g. PdDx to x < .56, 𝛼 >> 𝛽 phase
• Fleischmann and Pons used electrolysis to bulk load x > .9, but takes days to weeks to load
• McKubre has shown bulk PdDx, x > .86 for onset of LENR heat. [McKubre]
• Szpak showed electrolytic Pd/D co-deposition rapidly loads x≈ 1.0 [Mosier-Boss]
SEM analysis shows a size range from nm to 𝜇m scales
Miles and Barham: watts thermal
• Storms suggests nm fissures provide a nuclear active environment (NAE)
• Staker observed and created Pd Super-Abundant Vacancies (SAV) allowing high-densities of hydrogen isotopes
• DeChiaro modeled itinerant ferromagnetism and SAV
• Pianitelli, Takahashi, Celani and others have found Excess Heat: NiCu exhibit excess heat with hydrogen
LENR requires multiple science and engineering disciplines.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Questions remain: Scaling, self-operating, reaction products, life-time, triggering, mechanisms.
Common Features of LENR-Active Nano-Materials
Less appreciated
The roles of magnetic order and disorder
Bulk Ni Curie Point ≈ 354 ,
Nanoparticle Curie Point T less than bulk material
Pd is paramagnetic
ZrO2 in contact with Pd strains the lattice induces ferromagnetism
PdH and PdD are superconductors0
Superconductor YBCODx is LENR Active11 Is LENR a topological phenomena?
Is magnetism a key?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment of Needs
Experimental Improvement (minimum sensitivity to detect rare products or swamped by background)
High Temperature Calorimetry
Range 30 C – 500 C, > 100 mW sensitivity
Nuclear, HPGe, RF, IR, UV diagnostics, (> 5 sigma over background)
in situ and adjacent to operating devices: watch out for cosmogenic muons and neutrons, natural BG radiation
Real-time energetic particle spectroscopy preferred: TOF if possible (gold standard for particle energy)
Witness materials with HPGe insitu, post HPGe monitoring and material assays
Material assay and limitations (interferences) Indicates the roles of various structures and materials, contaminants
SEM/EDX: wide area FOV, qualitative surface structure, limited elemental sensitivity (parts per ten thousand)
ICP-MS: quantitative, isotope specific, but multi-ion (e.g. Hn+, Ar feed gas) complexes, ppb-ppm
TOF-SIMS: isotope specific, qualitative, small FOV, ppb-ppm
NAA/PGNAA: quantitative, isotope specific, limited isotope detection, ppt-ppm
Alpha/Beta Liquid Scintillator Spectrometer: tritium, activation products, limited energy resolution, ppm
• Patent Rights • Licensing
USPTO treats LENR heat as “perpetual motion”, hence, unpatentable, yet necessary for investment and commercialization
NRC and IAEA providence
Patents and patent interference
• Health Physics Concerns
Nanoparticles, especially non-encapsulated Ni-based nanopowder and their escape via seal and valve seat fouling
Self-generated B and EM fields
Bremsstrahlung radiation
Neutron radiation
Fundamentally, there is a need to run longer with simultaneous diagnostic measurements to correlate effects.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Possible ARPA-E Program Going Forward
Drive towards LENR/Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) Scaling
Self-sustaining operation
Establish LENR/LCF lifetime, power output/gm, available Delta T
Thermal or direct power conversion
Path to Commercialization: Watts, kW or MW?
Investigate multiple LENR/LCF-capable experiments: “Lab rats”
• Develop predictive modeling of materials and nuclear effects
Setup cooperative teams: share knowledge and findings!
Catch-22: Government agencies won’t recognize LENR unless Tier 1 journals publish results. These journals won’t publish results unless LENR is recognized by these agencies.
Publish results in “Tier 1” journals
Recognition by scientific and engineering communities
Acceptance by government agencies and universities
Harness private sector funding
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Beyond ARPA-E Program
Multi-agency supported LENR/LCF Program
Foreign entity participation
Develop university and student support to create the technology workforce
Deploy the technology
• Arata: 10 Wt 12 weeks 3 g Pd-black nanoparticles w/D2 3.3 73 MJ
• Takahashi 226 Wt several weeks [5] 505 g CuNi nanoparticles w/H2 0.45 683 MJ
• Ahern: 21 Wt 5 days 5 g PdNi nanopowder w/D2 4.2 9 MJ
• Celani: 18 Wt 5 hours 0.45 g CuNi nanolayers w/H2 or D2 40.0 324 kJ
Excess Heat in Watts Duration Mass Material Wt/g Joules • Arata: 10 Wt 12 weeks 3 g Pd-black nanoparticles w/D2 3.3 Wt/g 73 MJ • Takahashi 226 Wt several weeks [5] 505 g CuNi nanoparticles w/H2 0.45 Wt/g 683 MJ • Ahern: 21 Wt 5 days 5 g PdNi nanopowder w/D2 4.2 Wt/g 9 MJ • Celani: 18 Wt 5 hours 0.45 g CuNi nanolayers w/H2 or D2 40.0 Wt/g 324 kJ
The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/lenr/index?tab=articles
Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science
—
Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y
Acronyms:
LENR: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions. [Also Lattice Enabled Nuclear Reactions, but seldom used]
CANR: Chemical Assisted Nuclear Reactions [fallen into disuse along with LANR/Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reactions]
CMNS: Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
LCF: Lattice Confined Fusion [NASA’s term for it]
AHE: Anomolous Heating Effect. Also PFAHE, for the Pons-Fleischmann AHE.
Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette
https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp
Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
“If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc.” ~Jim Robinson
The issue isn’t whether we allow skepticism, it is whether we allow hyperskeptics and skeptopaths to ruin the scientific dialog. Such FReepers who persist in polluting these threads have been asked to leave, and we are asking that they open their own threads if they have comments.
“This topic has a following, people who wish to learn and discuss the materials presented. Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue. Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter.” ~ Sidebar Moderator https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3977426/posts?page=19#19 —————————————————————————————————————
I calculate that Arata's results generate the thermal energy equivalent of 529 grams of gasoline for each gram of deuterium. I'm assuming the "Material" column indicates the mass of deuterium used, not the mass of palladium nanopowder, which is not consumed.
Way to much to be an accident, experimental error, or to be the result of chemical processes.
Even so, only a tiny fraction of the deuterium would have undergone fusion, which would release something like one hundred million times more energy per gram than would gasoline. Only a few micrograms of D2 would have actually fused.
I don’t think they’re measuring how much H2 or D2 is going in.
From slide 4 of the pdf. Look at the Materials, and how much they weighed.
Arata (nano-Pd black/D2 double cathode) [Narita &Nagle]
Material: 20 nm diameter, Pd black, 3 g
Triggering: Electrolytically loaded, [1 kbar D2]
Excess Heat: 5 – 10 W, continuous
Duration: 12 weeks
Celani (CuNiMn & oxide nanolayers, D2 or H2)
Material: Mod. Constantan [Cu55Ni44Mn] w/oxides, 0.45g
Triggering: Thermal, 50 Hz A/C stimulation, 600 V, heating
Excess Heat: 18 Wt with 99.7 W Joule heating
Duration: 5 hours
Ahern (nano-PdNiZrO2/D2)
Material: 10 nm diameter PdNiZrO2 powder, 5 g
Triggering: Thermal, T > 360 ℃. [Ni Curie Point, 358 ℃]
Excess Heat: ~ 21 watts, not repeated
Duration: 5 days, terminated for evaluation
Takahashi (PdNiZrO2 & CuNiZrO2 nanopowders) [Narita]
Material: PdNi10/ZrO2 (PNZ10), Cu3Ni7/ZrO2 (CNZ7) 505 g
Triggering: Thermal?
Excess Heat: PNZ10rr 186 W/kg D2
CNZ7rr 226 W/kg H2
reaction energy (η-value) 10^3 to 10^5 eV/D
Duration: several weeks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.