Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Consider COVID vax history when assessing adenopathy on mammograms (44% of COVID-vaccinated women have an average 1.5 cm underarm lymph gland issues & the few who got them biopsied had 21% “malignant” results)
Medical Xpress / Healthday / Radiology ^ | Aug. 28, 2022 | Stacey Wolfson, M.D. et al

Posted on 05/01/2022 2:31:28 PM PDT by ConservativeMind

Axillary lymphadenopathy, a common adverse effect of COVID-19 vaccination, is seen in 44 percent of patients undergoing breast imaging after vaccination, according to a study published in the May issue of Radiology.

Stacey Wolfson, M.D., from the New York University Grossman School of Medicine in New York City, and colleagues examined the outcomes of axillary lymphadenopathy among patients who received the COVID-19 vaccine and underwent breast imaging between Dec. 30, 2020, and April 12, 2021.

The researchers found that 44 percent of the 1,217 patients who received the COVID-19 vaccine and underwent breast imaging had lymphadenopathy during at least one imaging examination. The average node measured 1.8 cm among patients with lymphadenopathy. Lymphadenopathy was more likely to be seen within 14 days after vaccination, while at 50 days following the second dose, it was rare. Forty-three patients (8 percent) underwent biopsy: 79 and 21 percent had benign and malignant results (34 and nine patients, respectively). There were 407 follow-up examinations in 387 patients (72 percent) with lymphadenopathy. At follow-up examination averaging 15.7 weeks after initial examination, 79.4 percent of studies demonstrated reduced lymph node size and were considered benign. Stable findings were reported in 20.6 percent; these were assessed as probably benign with recommendation for further follow-up. No patients in the follow-up group were diagnosed with a subsequent malignancy. Up to 43 weeks after vaccination, persistent axillary lymphadenopathy was observed.

"There should be no delay in screening mammograms due to recent vaccination and there is variable time to resolution of reactive lymphadenopathy," the authors write.

(Excerpt) Read more at medicalxpress.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: lymphadenopathy; lymphnodes; malignant
The paper did not appear to provide the “norm” for the population, so maybe these women had cancer from other causes, or the vaccines induced a worse response. Only 8% were biopsied.

However, having any issue after a vaccine would be a concern to me, and 44% of women had just this one problem, without including other possible things other women also got.

1 posted on 05/01/2022 2:31:28 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission; Mazey; ckilmer; goodnesswins; Jane Long; BusterDog; jy8z; ...

The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List

This potentially high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.

Now keeping a new list (“Common/Top Issues”) for conditions expected to only concern at least 1% of the population. Ask to be on either the “Common/Top Issues” or “Everything” list.

Please email or private message me if you want on or off of a list and of which list you desire.

2 posted on 05/01/2022 2:33:33 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

My Friend’s 18 yo dtr named Signe had 2 covid vax. She found a lump under her arm. Mamogram, Doctor wait and watch. Recently she had her 3rd shot.

“my period is late”. She is a virgin and said that her period gets mixed up after a covid vax. Her friends say the same thing.

Last week Signe had a re-check mamogram. There is a new lump under the other arm.

I cried when I heard this.


3 posted on 05/01/2022 2:39:51 PM PDT by BarbM (Men who look at porn are impotent to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I typoed the title. The average size was 1.8 cm, not 1.5.


4 posted on 05/01/2022 2:41:08 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind; ransomnote; Cathi; metmom; grey_whiskers; bagster; tatown; Enlightened1; cgbg; ...

Yet another HORRID adverse effect of these dangerous $hots.


5 posted on 05/01/2022 2:43:57 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
"and THEN I said that 'winter of severe illness and death' thing, to scare them into taking the 'safe' shots!"


6 posted on 05/01/2022 2:53:03 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Sickening....in so many ways 😩


7 posted on 05/01/2022 2:55:21 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I think I heard similar conclusions in the past, that women should “not delay” screening because of vaxes.

Based on this, I’d delay at least 6 weeks after vax. Is it really worth the worry, and waste of time and money on follow-ups, because many find a false-positive enlarged lymph?


8 posted on 05/01/2022 3:04:00 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Ping


9 posted on 05/01/2022 3:13:00 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BarbM

I pray she is fine. Please note that the findings are that few were actually malignant and most all went away after some months. OP made some good comments regarding that the few there were could have had underlying cancer to start with.


10 posted on 05/01/2022 3:16:25 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

Most womens’ glands had gone back to normal by that point, in the study.


11 posted on 05/01/2022 3:47:34 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Iodine might help


12 posted on 05/01/2022 5:19:21 PM PDT by goodnesswins (....pervert Biden & O Cabal are destroying America, as planned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

The cancers and VAIDS from the vaccine are just starting to show up in statistical analysis. I predict that in a couple of years, the volume of data that supports correlation and perhaps causation will be too much to ignore.

Then we will see a legal fight over vaccine immunity. Since I and most of my family remain un-vaccinated, it is not of immediate concern to us.


13 posted on 05/01/2022 10:11:35 PM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Also common after a smallpox vaccination:

https://www.drugs.com/sfx/smallpox-vaccine-side-effects.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817408/

https://www.healthline.com/health/cancer/axillary-lymphadenopathy#side-effect-of-covid-19-vaccine


14 posted on 05/01/2022 10:20:09 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt; null and void

BIG HINT WHY THE CHINESE ‘OVERREACT TO COVID INFECTIONS: (it’s a relief)

https://www.jpost.com/health-and-wellness/coronavirus/article-705505

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Communications on Friday, Friday, analyzed data from 2.3 million adults.

The researchers found that groups at a higher risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19 were the elderly, males, people from Asian and Black ethnic backgrounds and people who live in poor areas. Imperial College noted that these metrics were consistent with the results of previous studies.


15 posted on 05/02/2022 5:01:53 AM PDT by GOPJ (G wanumballs and illegals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=45&v=LPjzfGChGlE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Everthing list, Please?

Thanks.


16 posted on 05/03/2022 10:08:09 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ; - )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Everthing list, Please?

Thanks.


17 posted on 05/03/2022 10:08:09 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ; - )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson