Posted on 07/20/2022 10:59:47 AM PDT by rktman
A new medical study published by The Lancet, a weekly peer-reviewed general medical journal, shows Wuhan coronavirus booster shots can be harmful to the immune system and can cause adverse effects. The study also shows that after 8-months, a vaccinated person has the same immunity levels against the virus as an unvaccinated individual.
"Recently, The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible," the National Institutes of Health published in response to the study.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Way back when this mess first started, I adamantly refused to get the shot.
My reasoning at the time? There is no way I’m going to put something into my body that hasn’t been thoroughly tested with a full list of possible side effects released.
It seems my reasoning then, and now, was and is solid.
I’m still a pureblood, and dang proud to be one.
Suspicions confirmed. The mRNA shot do not simply provide very spotty immunity, the immune system the body already has is sometimes severely compromised. Making adverse reaction to a number of other pathogens highly likely, so the COVID-10 Wuhan virus does not kill directly (it rarely does), but creates vulnerability from many other vectors.
This is known as death control. Same objective as birth control, but may be applied post-partum. Objective, fewer human beings on Planet Earth.
Say it ain’t so.
*cough* Indicated as much a couple times over the past year within FR but most everyone goes on like things are normal and they keep complying and getting their what 4th or 5th booster now? *cough*
You are missing in action here, your propaganda masters will be unhappy with you if you don’t show up to set us straight.../s
...frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible,” the National Institutes of Health published in response to the study.
—
Why am I not surprised. This is like many reactions in the human body. Take too much nasal decongestant, get a stuffy nose. Take too many antacids tablets, get a more acidic stomach. The human body is a wonderfully complicated bio mechanism we barely understand; and we have little knowledge of the secondary effects of many medications or therapeutics. And our understanding of the human body immune response mechanism is far from complete. This is a very subtle mechanism to be capable of fending off disease effectively without destroying the body’s own tissues.
good article
Boosters?!? We don’ need no stinkin’ boosters!!
What do you call 1,000 COVID boosters injected into the arses of the vaxers? A good start.
😅🔬😵🚫💉
Those who had blind faith in these things put their trust in a word, “Vaccine”, without ever caring to know what precisely was meant by that word in this case. That was their simplistic attitude, “Vaccines good.” That was as far as their thought process went.
You would think that decades of Leftists twisting the language beyond all recognition as a prelude to pushing their social agenda would have taught most conservatives to be wary of people using undefined words to win their confidence. Sure, “vaccine” in the long distant past usually meant a substance that prevented you from getting a disease, and that was itself, while never risk-free, at least substantially safer than getting the disease itself. But these hastily-prepared, barely tested, MRNA-based substances are not real vaccines at all, because they don’t prevent you from getting the disease and don’t prevent you from passing it on, PERIOD. Which is why the medical establishment had to quietly change the very definition of “vaccine.”
So that word is meaningless today, and those blindly trusting in that word are gambling with their long-term health.
"Was it from that filthy needle you stuck in?"
I don't see the Lance study concluding that there is harm to the immune system, only that the vaccine's effectiveness wanes over time. In fact they concluded: "The results strengthen the evidence-based rationale for administration of a third vaccine dose as a booster.".
The Lancet study is the first reference listed if you follow the link to the Town Hall article and then the link to the "National Institutes of Health published" link in blue.
Or you can just go directly to the Lancet study here: Risk of infection, hospitalisation, and death up to 9 months after a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine: a retrospective, total population cohort study in Sweden">
"Findings: Between Dec 28, 2020, and Oct 4, 2021, 842 974 individuals were fully vaccinated (two doses), and were matched (1:1) to an equal number of unvaccinated individuals (total study cohort n=1 685 948). For the outcome SARS-CoV-2 infection of any severity, the vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 waned progressively over time, from 92% (95% CI 92 to 93; p<0·001) at 15-30 days, to 47% (39 to 55; p<0·001) at 121-180 days, and to 23% (-2 to 41; p=0·07) from day 211 onwards. Waning was slightly slower for mRNA-1273, with a vaccine effectiveness of 96% (94 to 97; p<0·001) at 15-30 days and 59% (18 to 79; p=0·012) from day 181 onwards. Waning was also slightly slower for heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 plus an mRNA vaccine, for which vaccine effectiveness was 89% (79 to 94; p<0·001) at 15-30 days and 66% (41 to 80; p<0·001) from day 121 onwards. By contrast, vaccine effectiveness for homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine was 68% (52 to 79; p<0·001) at 15-30 days, with no detectable effectiveness from day 121 onwards (-19% [-98 to 28]; p=0·49). For the outcome of severe COVID-19, vaccine effectiveness waned from 89% (82 to 93; p<0·001) at 15-30 days to 64% (44 to 77; p<0·001) from day 121 onwards. Overall, there was some evidence for lower vaccine effectiveness in men than in women and in older individuals than in younger individuals.
"Interpretation: We found progressively waning vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection of any severity across all subgroups, but the rate of waning differed according to vaccine type. With respect to severe COVID-19, vaccine effectiveness seemed to be better maintained, although some waning became evident after 4 months. The results strengthen the evidence-based rationale for administration of a third vaccine dose as a booster.
A link to the study...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35659687/
From the link...
“...These clinical alterations may explain the association reported between COVID-19 vaccination and shingles...”
Anyone else wondering about the sudden cases of alleged monkeypox, meningitis, and mystery pediatric hepatitis...?
Correction, the link above is to a letter to the editor...
I wonder which study they’re talking about. A link would have been nice. Here is a list of suspects...
The initial shot lasted 4.5 months. The boosters lasted 4 months. One side of my family suffered from horrific adverse effects including shingles, appendicitis and severe cardiac issues amongst 4 individuals of indigenous descent. My side of the family is too stubborn to admit if they had an issue so who knows? No one in the hospital but they did catch rough cases of covid after the jab.
Same.
Not putting anything in me that won’t come out, wear off or has no antidote.
No antidote for the CONvid vax....... 🔬😵😷💉🚫
No kidding?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.