Posted on 01/04/2023 2:22:13 PM PST by nickcarraway
Better management of nitrogen-rich fertilisers through alternating crops, optimising use and other measures can yield huge environmental and health benefits, but must boost food production at the same time, researchers warned Wednesday.
Reducing nitrogen pollution from global croplands is a "grand challenge", the group of international researchers said in a study in Nature outlining a dozen urgently-needed reforms.
The intensive use of chemical fertilisers helped fuel the four-fold expansion of the human population over the last century, and will be crucial for feeding 10 billion people by 2050.
(Excerpt) Read more at channelnewsasia.com ...
The point is they don’t want to feed 10 billion people in 2050.
1. No carbon use
2. No nitrogen use
3. No oxygen use
After they are done banning those, they can go for silicon, aluminum and iron.
more stupid science on display.
Feeding a mere 500 million people won’t be a problem though. 🤔😵🐎💩
Nitrogen is an element that makes up 78% of air. It’s not a pollutant. I know that’s not what they meant but it’s what they said.
They have demonized carbon and nitrates. What next?
Propaganda straight out of Beijing. Chemical fertilizer bad!
Calling BS on this “science”.
Nitrogen is 78% of the composition of the atmosphere. There is no way that humans can change that to the extent that it would affect the climate.
White men.
“nitrogen pollution”
In a planet where the atmosphere is about 4/5s nitrogen, this sounds like a phrase an insane person would come up with.
Look like we need to figure out how to get rid of the atmosphere.
” Reducing Nitrogen Use Key to Human and Planetary Health: Study”
Of cour$e the probable re$ult of thi$ $tudy is more $tudie$ are needed.
4. Di-hydrogenmonoxide. It’s a killer!~
I ran energy R&D programs for 20 years. There wasn’t a research report written that didn’t conclude “Recommendations: More research is needed.”
According to ‘scientists’, everything on earth and in the atmosphere is destroying the earth and atmosphere.
I guess the only hope is to create a giant ‘black hole’ and destroy the entire Earth and its atmosphere.
“We had to destroy the Earth to save the Earth.”
Never forget that the whole "CO2 global warming" scam was invented by the neo-malthusian Club of Rome as a tool to force a drastic die-off of human populations. This is only the beginning. Ultimately, YOU are the carbon they want to reduce.
Meanwhile, trust the climate oligarchs to find private profit in public policy.
With all that excess carbon and nitrogen - we can make nitroglycerine
Smart countries and leaders in the rest of the world will begin to simply ignore the Government of the United States, and the EU.
Russia has already kicked it off.
And the US deep-state knows, if Russia wins in Ukraine, its all downhill from there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.