Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grand jury report recommends perjury charges (Fulton County, Trump Case)
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 2/16/2023 | Tamar Hallerman & Bill Rankin

Posted on 02/17/2023 7:44:20 AM PST by Beave Meister

For nearly eight months, 23 Fulton County residents met in secret to investigate a hotly contested question: did former President Donald Trump and his allies break Georgia laws by meddling in the 2020 election?

On Thursday, the public got its first glimpse into what they found as a judge released five pages of their final report.

Members of the special grand jury agreed unanimously that there was no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election as Trump and his supporters had claimed. A majority of the panel also recommended that prosecutors should pursue perjury charges against at least one witness they believe lied under oath in their testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2020; 2020election; atlanta; bidencrimes; billrankin; corruption; djt; donaldjtrump; donaldtrump; fjb; fraud; fultoncounty; georgia; joebiden; maga; perjury; tamarhallerman; thedonald; trump; trumpwon; voterfraud
I'm sure the only perjury in this case was done by the Democrats and RINO's...What a waste of money.
1 posted on 02/17/2023 7:44:20 AM PST by Beave Meister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

I thought this was about an election, perjury? waste of time/money


2 posted on 02/17/2023 7:45:54 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

process crime without underlying crime

political persecution


3 posted on 02/17/2023 7:46:11 AM PST by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

If they’re going to no bill trump then they may be suggesting the prosecution/state committed perjury


4 posted on 02/17/2023 7:50:50 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

“...no evidence of widespread fraud...”

Ignore those suitcases under the table, full of ballots, waiting to be fed into the machines. This after they ordered the Republican poll watchers to go home because of a bathroom sink leak.


5 posted on 02/17/2023 8:09:53 AM PST by Flavious_Maximus (Tony Fauci will be put on death row and die of COVID!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

Ehat about all those who purjured themselves Impeaching Trump over false dossier? There is clear evidence that they used false info and obtained warrants based on false info.


6 posted on 02/17/2023 8:15:58 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus

Great point.

And ignore all the ballot harvesting and old folks being manipulated in nursing homes to vote Democrat when they normally wouldn’t have on their own, and ignore all the social media co,lesion with government agencies to cover up info about the bidens and about fetterman etc in order to win the elections.


7 posted on 02/17/2023 8:18:20 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

Fulton county is the single most corrupt county in GA every four years.


8 posted on 02/17/2023 8:19:08 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

Talk about indicting a ham sandwich! Eight months of grand jury (remember: prosecution side only) hearing. Forget it.


9 posted on 02/17/2023 8:21:52 AM PST by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

“unanimously that there was no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election”

Isn’t “widespread” a subjective adjective, subject to the opinion of whomever makes the comment? Seems to me that ANY fraud should be unacceptable and should be the basis of investigations and prosecutions. Using “widespread” as the “standard” for investigations is what these people have using to get away with fraud and corruption they commit in the elections . . .


10 posted on 02/17/2023 8:28:42 AM PST by MCSETots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

Lol, the grand jury agreed there was no widespread fraud BUT that was not what they were investigating and they were only allowed to see what the prosecutor wanted them to see.


11 posted on 02/17/2023 8:32:35 AM PST by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Actually all the time


12 posted on 02/17/2023 8:55:39 AM PST by Nifster ( EI see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

“process crime without underlying crime’

There you go. If there are only prosecutions for perjury, then it will prove this was just another political clown show by Democrats. Also shows why those called before the Grand Jury should have taken the 5th. Perjury within the legal definition can be hard to prove in court since malicious intent comes into play. Prosecutors will make a big show of filing charges against a few people, the cases will drag on and ultimately nothing will come of this.


13 posted on 02/17/2023 8:58:06 AM PST by Roadrunner383
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus

The video showing Ruby et al pulling out boxes of ballots and counting them (multiple times) was defacto proof of illegal election activity. Period.

No observers were present. Nobody knows the chain of custody. Nobody can explain how/why they ran ballots multiple times. The math did not work either.... the ratio of Biden/Trump ballots changed drastically when they dumped that batch of ballots to something so far outside of statistical probability that it is obvious and certain.

It was not just that batch either. Her mother posted facebook video of her working ballots in a cubicle AND bragged openly about defeating Trump.

Nope. Nothing to see. This whole fiasco was as obvious as the Hunter laptop.


14 posted on 02/17/2023 9:27:29 AM PST by volunbeer (We are living 2nd Thessalonians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MCSETots

Especially true since this was a Fulton County grand jury seated by a politically motivated idiot county attorney.

So they make a statement there wasn’t “widespread” fraud, because, in fact there was focused monumentally provable election fraud within Fulton County alone. Enough to tip the Electoral State vote. Precisely 12K plus votes in excess of the loss Biden had before the fraud count/reruns and reruns of the same “ballots”.... to get to that numeric “vote” win.

This is the trick- they cannot address widespread, because it was clearly overwhelming in Fulton County, about which they say....nothing. Cute trick.


15 posted on 02/17/2023 10:42:01 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

See what they did? They found election fraud.....BUT not wide spread. HOWEVER there may have been lies and we need to go after those lies to divert from election fraud we saw.


16 posted on 02/17/2023 11:46:54 AM PST by fightin kentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MCSETots

They “won” by only 10,000 “votes”, right? But yes it was widespread to achieve that paltry margin.


17 posted on 02/17/2023 1:43:15 PM PST by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus

Ignore those suitcases under the table, full of ballots, waiting to be fed into the machines.


You should, since they are clearly the cases which were on the table a few minutes before, and which allows people to ignore that they didn’t actually reset counting batches when they reran them, and that the ‘audit’ didn’t detect clear incidents of fraud and alterations of records while claiming to come up with the same numbers during a recount of the ballots.

Those suitcases should never have been put under the tables, nor the counting begun without witnesses, nor without supervisors, but those particular suitcases weren’t smuggled in.


18 posted on 02/17/2023 6:45:04 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson