Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: batazoid
Thank you.

Not familiar with most of those cases, but Van Ark comes up a lot and I did read up on that one. In that case Van Ark was denied to be a citizen, though born in the US. IIRC, the issue was ‘native’ born vs ‘natural born’.

I do agree that legally anyone born in the US is a native born citizen, but a ‘Natural born’ citizen is a separate issue.

I also would favor a change in the law that would require one parent to be either a citizen, or legal resident, of the country for the child to be considered a citizen. I’m

64 posted on 05/26/2023 7:18:11 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ( Biden-Fetterman in ‘24: It's a no brainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.

You are right. It is absolutely insane to consider every person born in the U.S. (with a few exceptions) a citizen of the U.S. For the life of me, I cannot explain why the 14th Amendment has not been updated, to, as you say, require at least one parent being a U.S. citizen at the time of their offspring’s birth in this country.


67 posted on 05/26/2023 7:51:21 AM PDT by batazoid (me )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

Van Ark is a Wisconsin state case, if I am not mistaken.


68 posted on 05/26/2023 7:55:53 AM PDT by batazoid (me )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson