Posted on 09/04/2023 5:58:45 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Perhaps it is a little early for another update here on the “homelessness” situation in San Francisco. (My last update was about six months ago in March 2023.). But there is a good reason for an update now: At least a few people seem finally to be catching on that the basic idea behind “homelessness” advocacy is to exploit an issue that brings forth great human empathy to generate vast taxpayer funds and then to not solve the problem. The spending continues and increases without limit. There is way too much money — for advocates — in “homelessness” for the problem ever to get solved, or even to decrease materially.
Two recent pieces from Bay Area writers commenting on the situation are: Sanjana Friedman at Pirate Wires, August 17, “San Francisco's Homeless Ticking Time Bomb”; and Susan Dyer Reynolds in the Marina Times August edition, “Fraudenbach: How the Coalition on Homelessness is holding San Francisco hostage.”
From the intro to Friedman’s piece:
The hardest thing you’ll ever have to comprehend in terms of San Francisco’s government is the city’s leaders aren’t incompetent. This is what they want. . . . Once acquainted with the basic facts of the crisis, including the incredible sum of money dedicated to solving the problem, the average San Franciscan concludes the city must be run by morons. . . . Even with supportive services, the numbers don’t add up. This is because the average person assumes the small cabal of activists who run the city’s bloated homeless industrial complex want to temporarily shelter and rehabilitate the homeless. They do not.
(Emphasis added.). So, what do they want?
The goal of San Francisco’s activist government is to provide every person who moves to the city with a free, one-bedroom apartment for the rest of their life.
Needless to say, that goal is completely impossible to achieve.
My March 2023 post recounted the story of the big 2018 referendum, where San Francisco voters approved a payroll tax on city businesses to raise an additional $300 million per year to address the homelessness crisis, and to finally solve it once and for all. The $300 million got added to prior spending of about $285 million, close to doubling prior city spending on the homelessness issue. Note that these figures only include spending on the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (HSH), and do not include other amounts of government spending on the homeless individuals, including cash grants, welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, and much more.
Friedman has the latest numbers on homelessness headcount and spending put out by the city, which as she states “don’t add up.” The number of “homeless” in the city is given as 7,800, of which 4,400 sleep in the streets and 3,400 in shelters. (These numbers are based on a survey taken in 2022, which is more recent than the 2021 data used in my March post.). In a city of just over 800,000 people, this is just shy of 1% of the population. Spending this year for HSH is said to be $672 million. If spent on the 7,800 identified as homeless, that would come to more than $86,000 per head — a fantastic sum, given that none of the money actually goes to the supposed beneficiaries in cash. Rather, all of it is spent on the Homeless Industrial Complex to provide shelters and “services.” (The homeless people get cash and in kind benefits from other programs outside of this budget.)
But Friedman goes on to say that more than half (56%) of the budget of HSH does not go to the current homeless population, but rather to provide something called “permanent supportive housing” (PSH) to some 9,000 people who were previously homeless. That would be approximately $3500 per month for each of these people. Friedman describes the deal they get:
[T]here are no PSH-wide income maximum or minimum cutoffs, and no PSH-wide requirement that the tenant show progress in becoming financially independent, such as by working an ever-increasing number of hours, or even regularly looking for a job. If you're hopelessly addicted to drugs, SF will essentially enable your addiction in perpetuity, or for as long as you want.
If the remaining 44% of the $672 million is dedicated to the 7,800 currently on the streets or in shelters, that would come to about $3200 per month for each of them, the majority of whom live on the streets. Again, that $3200 is only for “homelessness” services, and does not include food, clothing, medical care, or anything else, all of which are provided by other government handouts.
Anyway, some 9,000 got the PSH apartments, and promptly another 7,800 turned up for the next round.
And, from Reynolds’s piece:
San Francisco’s homeless advocates believe money is the answer, with organizations coaching new arrivals to say they’re “from San Francisco” while helping them navigate the system. The “nonprofits” themselves complete what has become a billion-dollar industry chasing its own tail, with 59 providers receiving $240.6 million in fiscal year 2019–20, according to the latest audit by the city’s budget and legislative analyst.
Money may not be the answer to the homelessness problem, which never improves no matter how much is spent. However, it is clearly the answer for the advocates, who are pocketing money by the hundreds of millions. Remember, of that $240.6 million mentioned in Reynolds’s piece, exactly zero goes to the homeless individuals. All of it goes to the service providers. (The other $400+ million of the HSH budget also does not go to the homeless people, but rather to the government workers.)
Reynolds’s piece culminates with this quote from ex-San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown: “[The homelessness problem] is not designed to be solved. It is designed to be perpetuated. It is to treat the problem, not solve it.”
He sure got that one right. There is way too much money in homelessness for the problem ever to be solved.
It is an industry for the left.
Manhattan Contrarian ping.
and don’t forget preventing anyone else from solving the problem.
Absolutely true. The goal of homeless advocacy is the creation of victims...not their rescue.
That’s why the Brandon regime is importing so many homeless freeloader voters.
The Left aren’t about solving problems. They are only about making an issue of the problem, often where none exists.
Solutions to problems would wreck their gravy trains.
true concept for most of what government does. It’s all a scam.
Look at Arab Israeli relations. Going on for decades. Untold amounts of money spent. But was anything concrete ever done about it ? Never. Until Trump came along and normalized relations between Israel and several Arab countries.
Not mentioned was the crime and drug use, predictable unintended consequences of a progressive homeless policy, that has sent SF into a doom loop. Maybe the tide will turn against the homeless industrial complex in favor of clean streets. Nah.
And a jobs program ,,, where else can a guy with a degree in navel gazing get a high paying job?
Well .... ? There are only so many slots open in academia for professors ... to teach navel gazing ... but the homeless industry is booming.
I noticed MANY of the providers who work in the system always like to tell their story of when they were homeless.
Self perpetrating ... and subsidized.
An industry that produces homeless folks and Providers ... all feed and clothed by me and you.
.... spit .... compassionate my @$$
It is an industry for the left.
Anybody remember the self-serving movie Martin Sheen did many years ago about Homeless Advocate Mitch Synder? Sheen made him out to be a Saint but the truth was even worse, he was a fraud and scam artist.
So where is Martin Sheen on this, is downtown in San Francisco helping donating or just chilling in his nice home in Beverly Hills?
There is a lot of money in poverty.
All programs designed by the left and funded by the taxpayer are created to give cushy jobs to friends and relatives and to funnel some of the money back into democrat coffers.
They tell YOU it’s designed to help whatever ails you.
That is true, and along with the money leeches benefitting thereof the homeless population is serving a purpose for the planned growing collapse of the country.
But there will come a time when that same population is considered among the most expendable to those same planners.
winner winner tofu dinner
The issue is never the issue, the issue is always the revolution. If socialism isn't solving the problem, then something has to be done to make sure either that socialism solves the problem, or that the problem is not allowed to exist--remember how homelessness was always an issue with Reagan, never an issue with Clinton, always an issue with Bush, never an issue with Obama, and always an issue with Trump.
And for far too much of our medical-congressional-industrial complex” as well.
I met a young man who was homeless in Louisville. He went to a couple shelters on very cold night. Each told him they were full, and he couldn’t stay. He begged to sleep on the floor in the entrance, or anywhere inside. Still no. He said he realized then that homeless advocates are a racket.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.