Posted on 12/13/2023 8:59:27 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Introduction: The association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations and deaths after vaccination has been investigated primarily through cohort and self-controlled case series studies. In the present study, the sex ratios of reported deaths were compared by period.
Methods: Descriptive analysis was conducted using data on deaths reported after vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. The data used were published by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan. The risk period was defined as within 10 days of vaccination, and the control period was defined as 11 to 180 days after vaccination. Sex ratios were calculated for all-cause deaths and each outcome by dividing the number of males by that of females and multiplying by 100. Fisher's exact test was performed to analyze the results. Graphs were created to show the number of days from vaccination to death and that of reported deaths.
Results: For all-cause deaths among individuals aged ≥65 years, the sex ratio during the risk period was 92, significantly lower than that during the control period (130) (p=0.0050). Conversely, for all-cause deaths among those aged ≤64 years, the sex ratio during the risk period was 204, significantly higher than that during the control period (111) (p=0.044). Reported deaths were concentrated during the risk period in both groups. Sex ratios by period for each outcome were also examined. However, the differences were not significant across any of the outcomes.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination may influence the occurrence of death during the risk period. In a cohort study in Japan, there was no significant increase in all-cause mortality owing to vaccination. This does not contradict the results of the present study. The results of a cohort study provide support for vaccine safety. However, this does not indicate that vaccine-related deaths are nonexistent; it only indicates that their number is not large enough to make a significant difference. Japan has relief services for adverse health effects that provide financial support to patients.
On this occasion, it is difficult to determine whether a postvaccination death is incidental or vaccine-related. A self-controlled risk interval design and a comparison of sex ratios by period may be useful in examining the association between vaccination and deaths after vaccination when a cohort study does not detect a significant difference due to a low mortality rate. The latter approach may be particularly useful for analyzing data with reporting bias. The author believes that this approach may not provide conclusive evidence, but it can offer valuable insights into assessing vaccine safety.
Ping for your interest
Well. They don’t have Covid!
Planned obsolescence.
Nor did they have to deal with long COVID. The vaccine was a success for them!
p
It is a shame that the second group was not young males ages 15 to 30 that performed in athletic events between 1 and 3 years after vaccination. I think stopping the study at 180 days and including everyone below age 65 masked the death rate of young male athletes within the statistical analysis.
This explains why you weren’t considered as being vaccinated until two or three weeks had passed after getting jabbed. That exclusion window allowed the data collectors to disregard the early adverse effects. (If you died during this window, you were not vaccinated yet for data collection purposes.)
Curiously, folks could have dropped dead as they exited the facility, and it would have been just an amazing coincidence.
It’s just mind blowing to me how they are still pushing this deadly vaxx, especially to young people who are in no danger of dying from covid anyway. From the omicron version on covid appears no more lethal than the regular flu. Back in the late 70’s they pulled the swine flu vaxx and that was nowhere near as dangerous as this one. Just goes to show you how much big pharma has corrupted the system since then.
Some FReeper trolls: “People die all the time.”
-fJRoberts-
shrugs. this is just the same spike in deaths on the 2nd or 3rd day after the jab we’ve seen in numerous other observational studies. nothing new. yes. a lot of people die unexpectedly right after they get the jab. it’s a strongly suggestive correlation. that’s about all i can get out of this study on a quick review.
says little or nothing about the long term disaster this jab is especially for those who live on with crippling disabilities.
a lot more reportedly die immediately after this jab than would force a treatment off market in the old days.
used to be if 60 or so died, that would cause a treatment to be taken off the market posthaste. in this study, it says they’re looking at a small sample which produced about 1100 deaths. the causes of death are interesting and instructive. it’d be interesting to see what the major recorded or attributed causes of death by the doctors were in the first 5 days or less. my guess would be there’s a lot of allergic shock there as a precipitating cause of death which might have been blamed on a comorbidity, just as they were here in the US.
maybe somebody can check me on this, but i seem to remember the Japanese suspending the jab due to batch testing issues. (i think the jab was truly voluntary in Japan. no coercion like here.)
this kind of data which people here saw anecdotally very early on might have been why they suddenly stopped distribution and started testing.
You know, if they advertised the COVID injections like other drugs on TV, with the long lists of side effects and complications, nobody in their right mind would have taken the so-called vaccines. Perhaps that is true anyway.
(may spread virus to friends, relatives and associates, may cause premature death, may lead to heart attack or stroke even in healthy young adults, may not work for more than a couple of days, if any, and may be part of international plot to destroy health and immunity of American people ... okay okay, I won’t take it ... no you must, it’s IN YOUR BEST INTEREST).
Sure.
of course. but there was massive propaganda suppression of alternative sources of data and info by so called Experts, Big Health, Big Med, Big Pharma, Big Gov’t (the deep state alphabets), Big Data Modelling, etc., over most of the world concerning the Wuflu and then the answer to the Wuflu which was the mrna jab. the ignorant and the naive, the trusting fools, etc. were easily taken in by all of it.
certain honest people here and elsewhere were trading information: doctors, conservatives, researchers, alt media reporters, regular posters and commenters with annectdotes and expert knowledge, here and elsewhere were digging and questioning, and the real info was quickly pieced together and put out quickly on many alternative sites like FR, thank God. such kept me and many others from making terrible choices under extreme pressure.
“Teenagers always have had heart attacks previously!” - idiot trolls
Experts suggest Vaers, problems reported from the vaccine is about 1% so, do the math. % would be 180,000 one hundred per cent would be close to two million adverse effects from the shots.That's a shocking figure.
Especially when you consider that the Swi e Flu vaxx was pulled in ‘77 after causing fewer than three dozen reported deaths and around 500 reported injuries.
...Swine flu vaxx...
Could be bad news for Vaxx proponents. Should make them reconsider and/or repent for their vaxx Pollyanna ways.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.