Posted on 12/13/2023 8:59:27 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Around 70 percent of people who died in Japan after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine lost their lives in the first 10 days following the jab , according to a recent study.
The peer-reviewed Japanese study, published in the Cureus journal on Dec. 7, looked at the association between Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination and deaths within 10 days of vaccination.
The risk period was defined as within 10 days of vaccination, with vaccination day being Day 1, and the control period defined as 11 to 180 days after vaccination.
The analysis was divided into two groups: Group 1 representing individuals aged 65 and above and Group 2, which included people aged 64 and below.
The researcher identified 1,311 deaths in Group 1, which included 662 males and 649 females. In Group 2, the team identified 247 deaths—155 males and 92 females.
“The percentage of reported cases that experienced death within 10 days after vaccination was 71 percent in Group 1 and 70 percent in Group 2,” said the study results.
In Group 1, more women than men died overall from various medical conditions in the first 10 days of vaccination. Following the 10 days, there were more deaths reported of men.
Most of the post-vaccine deaths happened on the second day, followed by the third and fourth days.
Other than “unexplained deaths,” the biggest cause of death in this group was ischemic heart disease (119 deaths), followed by heart failure (92), and aspiration pneumonia/asphyxia (72). Autopsies were performed in eight of the 239 unexplained death cases.
In Group 2, over two times more men died than women from various medical conditions during the first 10 days of vaccination. Overall deaths after the initial 10 days were only slightly higher among men.
The highest number of post vaccination deaths were registered on the third day, followed by the fourth, second, and fifth days.
After “unexplained deaths,” the biggest cause of death in this group was ischemic heart disease (27 deaths), cardiac arrhythmias (24), subarachnoid hemorrhage (20), and myocarditis/pericarditis (17). Autopsies were conducted in nine out of the 51 unexplained deaths.
There was an outsized difference in male–female deaths owing to myocarditis/pericarditis during the “risk period,” with eight men dying compared to just one woman. Heart failure resulted in the deaths of nine men compared to two women.
“Some myocarditis/pericarditis cases may be included within the unexplained deaths category. Myocarditis is a complication of vaccination, especially in young adults and adolescent males,” said the study.
One contributing factor for higher deaths of men during the first 10 days is “thought to be the high number of myocarditis/pericarditis deaths including undiagnosed cases.”
For both groups, the other death causes were: cardiac arrhythmias, aortic aneurysm/dissection, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, respiratory failure, interstitial lung diseases, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, sepsis, anaphylaxis, thrombocytopenia, and marasmus.
In short, many more older Japanese women and men below 64 faced a higher risk of death immediately within the first 10 days of Pfizer vaccination.
The author, Yasusi Suzumura, calculated sex ratios for all-cause deaths and each outcome by dividing the number of males by that of females and multiplying by 100. That is, the higher the sex ratio, the greater the number of male deaths.
The author found notable differences between the number of deaths of men and women in both groups, impacting the study’s sex ratio.
“If there is no effect on the occurrence of death, there should be no difference in sex ratios by period. Thus, this finding indicates that vaccination may influence the occurrence of death during the risk period and might be associated with death,” the study stated.
The data on death numbers for the study were sourced from Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW).
Specifically, cases involving only the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccination reported between Feb. 17, 2021, and March 12, 2023, were included.
The study does not directly link the deaths with the vaccinations. "The results indicate that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination may influence the occurrence of death during the risk period," said the study.
The author pointed to some of the limitations of the study including that the number of days from vaccination to death may vary depending on treatment, and that the study did not consider the effects of the vaccination after 11 days.
Besides this, the author said the sex-based reporting could have only been performed by a few doctors, and that the mortality rates could not be calculated because the analysis was performed only for deaths after vaccination.
The study had a limited sample size, and hence should be “carefully” interpreted. “Finally, the analysis results should be carefully interpreted because not all deaths reported to the MHLW were related to vaccination. Incidental deaths may be included in the reported deaths.”
The study author stressed that since vaccines are administered to mostly healthy individuals, it should have a “higher level of safety than pharmaceuticals used for treatment and should have an exceptionally low vaccination mortality rate.”
Therefore, even when the vaccination mortality rate is exceptionally low, vaccine safety must be analyzed with statistical methods.
“On this occasion, it is difficult to determine whether a post-vaccination death is incidental or vaccine-related,” said the study. However, the author concluded that this approach can offer valuable insights into assessing vaccine safety.
The Epoch Times reached out to Pfizer for comment.
Commenting on the study, cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough said that the data on “COVID-19 vaccination and death in Japan is very similar to vaccine deaths in US/Domestic cases in VAERS,” according to a Dec. 9 X post. “Strongly supports causality for the nearly 1150 immediate deaths observed.”
VAERS has reported 18,188 deaths from COVID-19 vaccination through Sept. 29, 2023, with 1,150 deaths occurring on the same day as the vaccination.
In addition, 2,040 miscarriages, 9,053 heart attacks, 17,433 permanent disabilities, 5,057 myocarditis/pericarditis cases, and 36,184 severe allergic reactions were also reported.
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons also shared the Japanese study on X.
The study author clarified that they have received “no financial support” from any organization for their submitted work.
Multiple other studies have also linked COVID-19 vaccines with higher mortality rates. A Sept. 17 report by Correlation Research in the Public Interest found that in the 17 nations analyzed, all-cause mortality increased when COVID-19 vaccines were distributed.
Nine out of these 17 nations had no detectable excess deaths following the March 2020 WHO declaration of the pandemic. Excess deaths only began with the vaccination campaign.
In 15 of the 17 nations, there were unprecedented peaks in all-cause mortality in January and February 2022, which coincided with or followed the rollout of booster shots.
The study estimated 1.74 million excess deaths in the 17 nations during the vaccination period, which comes to roughly 1 per 800 injections.
Meanwhile, Japan has approved the world’s first self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, although the manufacturer has not published safety or efficacy data for the shot.
The latest iteration of the mRNA vaccine is even more potent than the present version, as it generates more spike proteins in the human body.
Introduction: The association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations and deaths after vaccination has been investigated primarily through cohort and self-controlled case series studies. In the present study, the sex ratios of reported deaths were compared by period.
Methods: Descriptive analysis was conducted using data on deaths reported after vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. The data used were published by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan. The risk period was defined as within 10 days of vaccination, and the control period was defined as 11 to 180 days after vaccination. Sex ratios were calculated for all-cause deaths and each outcome by dividing the number of males by that of females and multiplying by 100. Fisher's exact test was performed to analyze the results. Graphs were created to show the number of days from vaccination to death and that of reported deaths.
Results: For all-cause deaths among individuals aged ≥65 years, the sex ratio during the risk period was 92, significantly lower than that during the control period (130) (p=0.0050). Conversely, for all-cause deaths among those aged ≤64 years, the sex ratio during the risk period was 204, significantly higher than that during the control period (111) (p=0.044). Reported deaths were concentrated during the risk period in both groups. Sex ratios by period for each outcome were also examined. However, the differences were not significant across any of the outcomes.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination may influence the occurrence of death during the risk period. In a cohort study in Japan, there was no significant increase in all-cause mortality owing to vaccination. This does not contradict the results of the present study. The results of a cohort study provide support for vaccine safety. However, this does not indicate that vaccine-related deaths are nonexistent; it only indicates that their number is not large enough to make a significant difference. Japan has relief services for adverse health effects that provide financial support to patients.
On this occasion, it is difficult to determine whether a postvaccination death is incidental or vaccine-related. A self-controlled risk interval design and a comparison of sex ratios by period may be useful in examining the association between vaccination and deaths after vaccination when a cohort study does not detect a significant difference due to a low mortality rate. The latter approach may be particularly useful for analyzing data with reporting bias. The author believes that this approach may not provide conclusive evidence, but it can offer valuable insights into assessing vaccine safety.
Ping for your interest
Well. They don’t have Covid!
Planned obsolescence.
Nor did they have to deal with long COVID. The vaccine was a success for them!
p
It is a shame that the second group was not young males ages 15 to 30 that performed in athletic events between 1 and 3 years after vaccination. I think stopping the study at 180 days and including everyone below age 65 masked the death rate of young male athletes within the statistical analysis.
This explains why you weren’t considered as being vaccinated until two or three weeks had passed after getting jabbed. That exclusion window allowed the data collectors to disregard the early adverse effects. (If you died during this window, you were not vaccinated yet for data collection purposes.)
Curiously, folks could have dropped dead as they exited the facility, and it would have been just an amazing coincidence.
It’s just mind blowing to me how they are still pushing this deadly vaxx, especially to young people who are in no danger of dying from covid anyway. From the omicron version on covid appears no more lethal than the regular flu. Back in the late 70’s they pulled the swine flu vaxx and that was nowhere near as dangerous as this one. Just goes to show you how much big pharma has corrupted the system since then.
Some FReeper trolls: “People die all the time.”
-fJRoberts-
shrugs. this is just the same spike in deaths on the 2nd or 3rd day after the jab we’ve seen in numerous other observational studies. nothing new. yes. a lot of people die unexpectedly right after they get the jab. it’s a strongly suggestive correlation. that’s about all i can get out of this study on a quick review.
says little or nothing about the long term disaster this jab is especially for those who live on with crippling disabilities.
a lot more reportedly die immediately after this jab than would force a treatment off market in the old days.
used to be if 60 or so died, that would cause a treatment to be taken off the market posthaste. in this study, it says they’re looking at a small sample which produced about 1100 deaths. the causes of death are interesting and instructive. it’d be interesting to see what the major recorded or attributed causes of death by the doctors were in the first 5 days or less. my guess would be there’s a lot of allergic shock there as a precipitating cause of death which might have been blamed on a comorbidity, just as they were here in the US.
maybe somebody can check me on this, but i seem to remember the Japanese suspending the jab due to batch testing issues. (i think the jab was truly voluntary in Japan. no coercion like here.)
this kind of data which people here saw anecdotally very early on might have been why they suddenly stopped distribution and started testing.
You know, if they advertised the COVID injections like other drugs on TV, with the long lists of side effects and complications, nobody in their right mind would have taken the so-called vaccines. Perhaps that is true anyway.
(may spread virus to friends, relatives and associates, may cause premature death, may lead to heart attack or stroke even in healthy young adults, may not work for more than a couple of days, if any, and may be part of international plot to destroy health and immunity of American people ... okay okay, I won’t take it ... no you must, it’s IN YOUR BEST INTEREST).
Sure.
of course. but there was massive propaganda suppression of alternative sources of data and info by so called Experts, Big Health, Big Med, Big Pharma, Big Gov’t (the deep state alphabets), Big Data Modelling, etc., over most of the world concerning the Wuflu and then the answer to the Wuflu which was the mrna jab. the ignorant and the naive, the trusting fools, etc. were easily taken in by all of it.
certain honest people here and elsewhere were trading information: doctors, conservatives, researchers, alt media reporters, regular posters and commenters with annectdotes and expert knowledge, here and elsewhere were digging and questioning, and the real info was quickly pieced together and put out quickly on many alternative sites like FR, thank God. such kept me and many others from making terrible choices under extreme pressure.
“Teenagers always have had heart attacks previously!” - idiot trolls
Experts suggest Vaers, problems reported from the vaccine is about 1% so, do the math. % would be 180,000 one hundred per cent would be close to two million adverse effects from the shots.That's a shocking figure.
Especially when you consider that the Swi e Flu vaxx was pulled in ‘77 after causing fewer than three dozen reported deaths and around 500 reported injuries.
...Swine flu vaxx...
Could be bad news for Vaxx proponents. Should make them reconsider and/or repent for their vaxx Pollyanna ways.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.