Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could and Shoulda....Where do "Fredheads" go now?
Youtube.com ^ | 8/24/2009 | Brewferr

Posted on 08/24/2009 12:38:35 PM PDT by brewferr

So here we were in 2007 worrying about who would take the Reagan "mantle of conservatism" forward. John McCain, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Duncan Hunter, Mike Huckabee, Ron Paul and others were already in the race to become the next GOP nominee for president. And you know what? Conservatives were freaking out! Was this really the crop we had to choose from? None of these guys, with the exception of maybe Duncan Hunter or to an extent Ron Paul, really understood what conservatism was.

Then a grassroots draft campaign was initiated to bring someone into the race that really understood American exceptionalism. That individual was the former U.S. Senator from Tennessee - Fred Thompson. In Fred Thompson, conservatives had a real candidate to back. Thompson understood that government should be limited so that it could not tread on our natural God-given rights. He was a champion of low taxes, free-enterprise, traditional American social values, and a strong national defense. It just made sense to back Thompson.

So, in late 2007, Senator Thompson entered the race to become the next president. However, his campaign was attacked by the left-wing media and the other GOP presidential campaigns from the beginning. They accused Thompson of being "lazy like a fox", too radical, too old, etc. These ideas sank in and the Thompson campaigned left the field in early 2008.

That being said, McCain became the next GOP nominee. Conservatives felt betrayed until a little-known governor from Alaska, Sarah Palin came along. She electrified the base and undoubtedly gave the McCain campaign a much needed boost.

Fredheads, where do we go from here? Is Sarah Palin in fact the next person to bear the "mantle of Reagan"? I believe that she will be a force to be reckoned with in the future, but I still hold onto the hope that Senator Fred Thompson will one day be president.

In 1976, Governor Ronald Reagan decided to challenge a sitting president of his party for the GOP nomination. Reagan was repeatedly accused of being lazy, too old, and too radical. Those ideas sank in and Reagan narrowly lost the nomination to Gerald Ford that year. However, Ronald Reagan's campaign wasn't over. He would return in 1980, win the GOP nomination, and lead America into the largest peacetime economic expansion in recent years.

Even with the conservative Sarah Palin in the fray, I believe that there is still a role for Fred Thompson to play. We've pulled him out of political retirement before, and I believe that we can do it again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeVi2KF7hA4


TOPICS: Tennessee; Campaign News; Parties; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: conservative; duncanwho; election2012; fred; fredthompson; mccainsbuttboy; mittbots; moderateatbest; notconservative; onlyconservativein08; palin; paultards; presidentialelection; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Clintonfatigued
We haven’t even gotten to the 2010 elections yet.
Let’s concentrate on making gains in Congress first.

true...let's concentrate on 2010 mid-term(s).


61 posted on 08/24/2009 7:27:03 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voter: "Welcome to 'MY' DeathCARE ® Plan"...Sucker! ...now just die. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: elizabethgrace
U.S. Rep. Thad McCotter, (R) MI

U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, (R) WI

Yes, I forgot about Ryan, he's solid. I was initially quite interested in McCotter, since he came across as a solid fiscal conservative of the Austrian stripe. BUT, he also voted (along with the rest of the Michigan delegation) for a lot of the TARP/bailout stuff.

62 posted on 08/24/2009 8:24:42 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Prior to his votes on the auto bailout, (which I understood, given his district) I had taken issue with his vote in favor of increasing the minimum wage.

I still like him very much. He's smart, articulate and feisty. The democrats have targeted his seat, but recent events may have made him a lot less vunerable. :)

63 posted on 08/24/2009 9:07:09 PM PDT by elizabethgrace ("It is better to approximately right than precisely wrong." – Fortune Magazine, 1994)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: brewferr
Many of us former Fredheads back Palin.

It's a shame he didn't get more traction, with the media building up Huckafraud to further fracture the base, and no name losers like Hunter and Paul doing the same.
64 posted on 08/24/2009 9:29:41 PM PDT by Uncle Ivan (Alea iacta est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brewferr
sorry for jumping into this so late.

first of all, FredPAC is alive and well and will be supporting real conservatives in the 2010 election while garnering Fred activist support. Second, and sooo important is that Fred has a 2 hour daily format to get his message out along with a website with plenty of podcast download. This consititutes not retirement, but an on-going campaign/PR machine, the power of which should not be overlooked. I hardly think you have heard the last of Fred in US politics.

65 posted on 08/25/2009 10:26:44 AM PDT by APRPEH (www.fredthompsonshow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brewferr

it would be interesting to hear from Fred’s campaign volunteers in Iowa and South Carolina. Is everyone else all talk and no action?


66 posted on 09/06/2009 10:15:50 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

George H. W. Bush was picked by Reagan (after Ford turned him down). What does that prove about Reagan or Bush?


67 posted on 09/06/2009 10:21:03 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ("men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

WHAT IS HUSTLE
Hustle is doing something that everyone is certain can’t be done.
Hustle is shoe leather, elbow grease, sweat and missing lunches.
Hustle is doing something more for the customer than the other guy is doing.
Hustle is believing in yourself and the business you’re in.
Hustle is the sheer joy of winning.
Hustle is being the sorest loser in town.
Hustle is hating to take vacation because you might miss a piece of the action.
Hustle is working smarter, not harder.
Hustle is heaven if you’re a hustler.
Hustle is hell if you’re not.


68 posted on 09/06/2009 10:23:37 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson