[jwalsh07]

Why don't you quit your normal tactic of engaging in slippery slope arguments, and stick to the issue being discussed for once?

Luis, it is impolite to answer a question with a question. But I understand your reticence to engage in debate here. You either have to extend marriage to all who are exercising their "transcendent liberty" or you have to draw lines and regulate.

I am clear where I draw the line, you evidently do not have the wherewithal to draw a line.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"You either have to extend marriage to all who are exercising their "transcendent liberty" or you have to draw lines and regulate."

Why would that be?

We are talking about one adult making the choice to marry another adult.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"I am clear where I draw the line, you evidently do not have the wherewithal to draw a line."

The only thing you lack however, is the chalk to draw that line with.

The US Constitution guarantees that even those who you would leave on the other side of your "line" get a voice.

The mistake lies in the very fact that there is government involvement in marriage to start.