Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Life as Slaves (till the early 60's)
abc ^ | 12/20/03

Posted on 12/20/2003 9:39:46 AM PST by knak

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-142 next last
To: mhking
Hey, I was quicker than your ping by a split second....
61 posted on 12/20/2003 2:44:21 PM PST by Diva Betsy Ross ("were it not for the brave , there would be no land of the free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mylife
They are prolly liberal politians. <sarcasm> We dont need to go there. Nothing to see there. No need to open old wounds.... </sarcasm>
62 posted on 12/20/2003 2:50:26 PM PST by SwankyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Forty acres and a mule was so not like welfare. That just goes to show you how much this person knows about American history.

Continuining to be shocked and amazed in FR.
63 posted on 12/20/2003 2:50:47 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
The 40 acres was a just reward for centuries of unpaid toil. Biggest mistake ever made was not implementing and enforcing that promise.
64 posted on 12/20/2003 2:54:41 PM PST by lavrenti (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
That was just a touch stereotypical and bigoted. Yeah, just a touch.

Ya think? lol

My take on this story is, if true, attack the criminals who did this to the family - you didn't do it, I didn't do it -but if someone did, they deserve whatever can be thrown at them.......

65 posted on 12/20/2003 2:56:01 PM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Who were the "slave" owners? That should clear it up
66 posted on 12/20/2003 2:57:10 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay
"$40 acres and a mule" was the government program then.

No it wasn't. That was a proposal for how to deal with the issue of freed slaves - which was voted down in Congress.

67 posted on 12/20/2003 2:57:42 PM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: lavrenti
Absolutely because as former slaves, they could have more than used that to be prosperous. They already KNEW how to till the soil,etc.
68 posted on 12/20/2003 2:57:50 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Continuining to be shocked and amazed in FR.

Do yourself a favor. Don't be. Please.


69 posted on 12/20/2003 3:00:11 PM PST by rdb3 (The only problem I have with conservatism is conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
I would like to have seen ABC do their homework on this one before they ran with it, but there is the distinct possibility this could be true. There are deep rural areas of the South that haven't seen an "outsider" in decades.

Agree that, if true, the "slaveholders" should be brought to justice. This would be a true case for "reparations" to be made, because it would be a case of "this happened to ME", not my ancestors 5 generations back.


70 posted on 12/20/2003 3:04:32 PM PST by liberallyconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
You're right. I suppose a few people expect their retarded statements to go unanswered thinking everyone is of like mindedness. If one person doesn't immediately catch it, then some eventually will. That's not though police as some claim, it's about not making idiot statements.
71 posted on 12/20/2003 3:08:00 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: lavrenti
Excellent point. My, my... how the South would have changed if this had been implemented. Desegregation MIGHT have begun 100 years sooner.
72 posted on 12/20/2003 3:09:07 PM PST by liberallyconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: liberallyconservative
I respectfully disagree with your comment about reparations....... this would be a case of suing the people responsible..... a civil case which held the guilty party responsible...... and I have no doubt that there are probably people who were treated inexcuseably.....but both black and white..... people who are poor and too ignorant to know any better are used in many instances.
73 posted on 12/20/2003 3:10:30 PM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: liberallyconservative
This would be a true case for "reparations" to be made, because it would be a case of "this happened to ME", not my ancestors 5 generations back.

True, but don't be surprised if the Jesse Jackson Traveling Roadshow uses this to his betterment; true or not.

74 posted on 12/20/2003 3:11:15 PM PST by mhking (It's in your home state...it's outside your front door...and it's going to eat YOU up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Glad you caught that. I kinda scratched my head in amazement, and decided not to respond. Glad you did.
75 posted on 12/20/2003 3:11:37 PM PST by liberallyconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: liberallyconservative
Desegregation would have been immediate. Small white and black farmers were already attempting cooperative farming in parts of the deep South then.
76 posted on 12/20/2003 3:12:55 PM PST by lavrenti (I'm not bad...just misunderstood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Excellent point. I used "reparations" loosely and incorrectly. I had in mind that if true, and if caught, prosecuted and found guilty, then "damages" could be rightly sought.
77 posted on 12/20/2003 3:14:44 PM PST by liberallyconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: liberallyconservative
I have to give credit where credit is due. R caught it first. I had the same reaction as you,and to be honest I was more confused than anything.
78 posted on 12/20/2003 3:14:46 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: liberallyconservative
I thought that probably was what you meant......
79 posted on 12/20/2003 3:15:51 PM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
I live in Atlanta, Georgia, and read a newspaper story up in Flat Rock, North Carolina, while visiting my father. There was an article about poor peach pickers in the Southeastern States. Among them were whites, blacks, Latinos, you name it. Who were kept deeply in debt to the company store for CRACK, Alcohol, prostitutes, and many other illegal items. The article claimed that this was a very wide spread abuse of mostly the downtrodden, who had criminal records that made it hard for these people to get decent jobs. If they left, the local law would pick them up and return them, probably some kind of kick back involved. They also found it very hard to find people that would actually believe their stories of hell.

Although the Peach Picking stories entailed actual arrests for selling drugs and listed various Peach Grove violators. This original slavery story is highly possible, it does contain many holes in it that makes you wonder though. The whole deal about repatriation would end up as the biggest spending spree on drugs, booze, cars, and very few things that would benefit the receivers in the long term, otherwise known as just a waste of money.
80 posted on 12/20/2003 3:23:25 PM PST by herkbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson