Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dean: A Prophet Ahead of His Time?
WND.com ^ | 01-07-04 | Buchanan, Patrick J.

Posted on 01/07/2004 8:44:03 AM PST by Theodore R.

Dean: A prophet ahead of his time?

Posted: January 7, 2004 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Within four weeks, the Democratic nominee will probably be known, and this city believes it will almost surely be Howard Dean.

The Iowa caucuses on Jan. 19, the New Hampshire primary on Jan. 27, and the South Carolina primary on Feb. 3, same day as half a dozen other caucuses and primaries, will tell the tale.

The shrillness and savagery of the attacks on Dean by rival Democrats like Joe Lieberman underscore the point. They all understand that if Dean does not stumble, they all fall by Feb. 3.

Dean is today viewed as a perfect pigeon for George W. Bush. And it is hard to fault the assessment. He is angry, prone to gaffes, perceived as ultra-liberal and from a state where he never learned the rhetoric that can move Democratic minorities the way Clinton did.

Moreover, he is as divisive a figure in his party, with his denunciations of its "Republican wing" and "cockroaches" in Washington, as was Barry Goldwater in the GOP in 1964. And George W. Bush looks almost as certain of re-election as LBJ. Though, at times, LBJ, heir to the martyred JFK, ran 40 points ahead. Bush has never had such a lead.

Yet, the comparison is valid. For just as Goldwater split from his party's establishment to vote no on the great issue of 1964, the Civil Rights Act, Dean broke with his party to say "no" to Bush's war.

The greater question, however, is: Does Dean's movement portend the future?

Consider: Though Goldwater lost 44 states, the movement that nominated him captured the GOP at the Cow Palace in San Francisco, shifted the party's center of gravity south and west, helped elect Nixon twice, and put Ronald Reagan in the White House before passing into history.

McGovern's campaign also outlasted its champion. After the rout by Nixon in 1972, McGovernism, the political vehicle of the counter-culture and social revolution of the '60s, set down deep roots in the Democratic Party that have never been pulled up.

Like Goldwater, McGovern proved a candidate ahead of his time.

Conservative Democrats who stood against him in 1968 and 1972 – Mayor Richard J. Daley of Chicago, John Connally of Texas, Frank Rizzo of Philadelphia, George Wallace of Alabama – have no heirs in today's party. Even "New Democrats," though they decry the nomination of Dean as "another McGovern," are all pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-feminist, pro-affirmative action. Where do they dissent from the agenda McGovern offered?

Indeed, McGovernism has even made inroads into the Republican Party. Though employing conservative rhetoric to win, the GOP has been sliding leftward on social, cultural and even economic issues.

Like his father, Bush is running up huge deficits and increasing the domain of federal bureaucrats. He, too, is a champion of foreign aid and intervention to build a New World Order. He, too, is a global democratist who cites Wilson and FDR. He, too, is a "big government conservative" like his dad. Since taking his oath, he has not killed one federal program, agency or department, or vetoed a single bill.

LBJ won a landslide running on the "guns-and-butter" budget that financed the Great Society and the war in Vietnam. The Bush Republicans have gone LBJ one better. They are for guns and butter – and tax cuts, too.

On the cause of a constitutional amendment to ban abortion, Bush says America is not ready. Anyone ever heard the president preach from the Bully Pulpit to change our hearts?

After the Supreme Court affirmed the right of the University of Michigan to discriminate against white kids for 25 years – as long as it is not so blatant as adding 20 points to application scores for race – Bush hailed the court's recognition of the value of "diversity."

When the battle flag became an issue in South Carolina, Bush quietly removed a plaque to Southern war dead put up by the Daughters of the Confederacy in a Texas courthouse, and his brother Jeb took down the battle flag over the Florida statehouse.

Democrats are pro-gay rights. What do Bushites say? "We are inclusive." "We are for tolerance." "We are for diversity." "We are against discrimination." But, checking Gallup, "We believe marriage should be between a man and a woman." Heroic.

Republicans have been winning elections, even for Congress. But they have done so by shucking conservative principles. Like the Americans in Vietnam, they are winning all the set-piece battles, as they are losing the war.

Dean may be routed. But my guess is that whatever he stands for today will be embraced by his party tomorrow, and the GOP the day after. Civil unions, here we come.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; civilunions; confederacy; connally; conservatism; daley; dean; democrats; diversity; ghwb; goldwater; gunsandbutter; gwallace; gwbush; howarddean; iacauci; lbj; liberalism; lieberman; mcgovern; newdemocrats; newworldorder; nhprimary; patbuchanan; republicans; rizzo; scprimary; univmi

1 posted on 01/07/2004 8:44:04 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
john is no barry.
2 posted on 01/07/2004 8:48:23 AM PST by kallisti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Dean: A Prophet Ahead of His Time?

Not quite.

Try ''Dean: A Psycho Behind on His Meds''

3 posted on 01/07/2004 8:56:33 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Pat is saying that the Dean liberalism may not be supported in the 2004 election, but in time it will be embraced by both parties.
4 posted on 01/07/2004 9:06:02 AM PST by Theodore R. (When will they ever learn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
#####Pat is saying that the Dean liberalism may not be supported in the 2004 election, but in time it will be embraced by both parties.#####

He's right about that. By the end of this century America will either be a leftist dictatorship or will have broken up into several separate nations. The left set in motion a series of policies in the sixties that will eventually sink us. These include the massive entitlement programs (above and beyond the earlier New Deal), feminism, racially polarized politics, multi-culturalism & "diversity", the sexual "revolution", dumbed-down public education, moral & cultural relativism, and the 1965 Immigration Act.

A Chinese or Japanese historian, writing in the next century (when Asia is the center of world culture, power and wealth), will cite the 1960's as the decade that broke the back of Western Civilization. With the exception of a few belated rallies, it was all downhill after that.
5 posted on 01/07/2004 9:42:22 AM PST by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
---I agree. It all ties in to the sage of a couple centuries ago who stated that democracies only last until groups start voting themselves benefits out of the treasury--
6 posted on 01/07/2004 10:06:57 AM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kallisti
it is great articles like these which show why Pat is not president of the USA. what a deep thinker he must be to be able to compare Barry to Dean. IOn additon it was Regan that nomitated Barry and built a party, who did Dean nominated and what has he built but a flash in teh pan org or young people looking for dates.
7 posted on 01/07/2004 10:15:55 AM PST by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
Liberalism is a virus found in colleges, where it's open season on young minds. We won't change this unless we change the ideological imbalance there.
8 posted on 01/07/2004 10:16:02 AM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
Thanks for correcting the record. When Buchanan speaks (or writes) corrections are always needed. And many of them.
9 posted on 01/07/2004 10:29:08 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
we're on the same page. you even knew i meant howard, not john. must be pjb nixon flashbacks.
what i can't quite grasp is who's pulling howard's strings.
10 posted on 01/07/2004 11:20:46 AM PST by kallisti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
it was Regan that nomitated Barry

I respectfully disagree. Although Reagan nominated BG in a technical sense in a speech at the convention, the BG movement was not started by Reagan, rather by millions of conservative grassroots activists like Phyllis Schlafly (Choice, not an Echo). So in the sense that BG captured the imagination and articulated the values of this passionate movement, Dean is doing much the same, don't you think?

PJB is also right about GM and his values. He was pilloried and made fun of in the election (both by his own party and by RMN), but eventually a lot of his ideas (like amnesty for VW deserters) became mainstream in his party.

There was a time when big fat ugly Teddy stood on the steps of the USSC and denounced Roe v Wade when GM was all for it. Well, guess what happened since.

I agree with PJB that Civil Unions will become nationally acceptable in about 10 years, and it that narrow sense, yes Howard the Coward is ahead of his time.

11 posted on 01/07/2004 4:42:29 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Dean and "prophet" are not synonymous.

Main Entry: proph·et
Pronunciation: 'prä-f&t
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English prophete, from Old French, from Latin propheta, from Greek prophEtEs, from pro for + phanai to speak -- more at FOR, BAN
Date: 12th century
1 : one who utters divinely inspired revelations; specifically often capitalized : the writer of one of the prophetic books of the Old Testament
2 : one gifted with more than ordinary spiritual and moral insight; especially : an inspired poet
3 : one who foretells future events : PREDICTOR
4 : an effective or leading spokesman for a cause, doctrine, or group
5 Christian Science a : a spiritual seer b : disappearance of material sense before the conscious facts of spiritual Truth

12 posted on 01/07/2004 5:01:45 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson