Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5
The people who say they won't vote for Bush if he signs the bill probably never voted for him in the first place. They couldn't have been that active for their Second Amendment Rights or they would have known what he said and when he said it.

I voted for GWB, knowing full well what he said - that he was "in favor of the current law" or words to that effect. I took it to mean that he was in favor of ALL of the then-current law, including the part about it expiring on 9/13/04. Certain noises from his administration have convinced me that if a renewal of the AWB shows up on GWB's desk, he'll sign it. So let ME make myself very clear:

If I wake up on 9/14/2004 and I am not able to purchase everything gun-related that I could buy prior to 9/13/1994 without worrying about some member of the BATFE arresting me or worse, then I will NOT be voting for President Bush less than 2 months later, as I did in November 2000. PERIOD!!!!

41 posted on 01/26/2004 8:43:55 AM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Ancesthntr
And you missed the part where he said he would sign it if it reached his desk? How did that happen?

How did all these so-called Second Amendment Activists somehow miss something so important? You weren't discussing this at the campaign headquarters? No one mentioned at the Grassroots meetings?

42 posted on 01/26/2004 8:53:13 AM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Ancesthntr
President Bush: Here's what I believe, sir. I believe law-abiding citizens ought to be allowed to protect themselves and their families. I believe that we ought to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them. That's why I'm for instant background checks at gun shows. I'm for trigger locks. I think that makes sense. Matter of fact, we distributed free trigger locks in the state of Texas, so that people can get them and put them on their guns, to make their guns more safe. I think we ought to raise the age at which juveniles can have a gun.

But I also believe strongly that we need to enforce laws on the books, that the best way to make sure that we keep our society safe and secure is to hold people accountable for -- for breaking the law. If we catch somebody illegally selling a gun, there needs to be a consequence. If we keep -- somebody, you know, illegally using a gun, there needs to be a consequence, enforcement of the law. And the federal government can help.

There's a great program called Project Exile in Richmond, Virginia, where they focused federal taxpayers money and federal prosecutors and went after people who were illegally using guns. To me that's how you make society the safest it can be, and so, yes, sometimes I agree with some of these groups in Washington and sometimes I don't. I'm a pretty independent thinker. But one thing I'm for is a safe society, and I'm for enforcing laws on the books, and that's what's going to happen should I earn your confidence.

Waffle, waffle. Trigger locks? Raising the age to own guns? Don't you already have to be 18 to legally own a gun? 21 for handguns and "assault weapons? WTF??? Add in the statements made on the Presidents behalf by Scott and Ari, yas... Bush would most certainly resign the AWB in any ofrm that makes it to his desk.

46 posted on 01/26/2004 9:19:11 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson