Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Stinking Empire
King Features Syndicate, Inc. ^ | 01-26-04 | Reese, Charley

Posted on 01/26/2004 5:34:53 AM PST by Theodore R.

No Stinking Empire

The Army of World War II, you might say, was the last Army of the republic. It performed great deeds, but there was not much luxury, not even for the generals and admirals. Nobody was paid much. Travel was by military plane, troop train or warship, even for generals, admirals and world leaders.

Not so in today's imperial Army. According to Chalmers Johnson, an excellent writer, in his new book, "The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic," the Defense Department maintains a fleet of 71 Lear jets, 13 Gulfstream IIIs and 17 Cessna Citation luxury jets. That's in case any of the brass wish to visit the military's ski resort in the Bavarian Alps or any of the 234 military golf courses around the world. The secretary of defense, of course, has his own private Boeing 757.

Or maybe the brass might wish to visit some of the 702 overseas bases the United States has in 130 countries, or perhaps the 6,000 it has in the United States. The commander in chief, of course, has Air Force One and an entourage traveling with him that would rival any of the triumphal marches of Roman emperors.

Johnson says the Pentagon reports that some 253,288 uniformed personnel are deployed overseas, plus a roughly equal number of dependents and Defense Department civilian employees. He also says the Pentagon figures don't include bases in Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Qatar and Uzbekistan. Except for the one in Kosovo, those were all set up following the Sept. 11 attacks.

Excuse me, but I'm old-fashioned. I was a $70-a-month private who ate Army cooking and took his turn at KP (kitchen police), all of which is now done by civilian contractors, or so I'm told. Besides, I thought the Cold War was over. I thought the idea, after the Soviet Union collapsed, was to close overseas bases and bring the troops home. I seem to recall that the president, in his first campaign, promised a modest foreign policy and even hinted at reducing overseas deployments.

Instead, he's announced an aggressive foreign policy of pre-emptive attacks, has made war on two countries and has increased overseas deployment. In the process, of course, he has strained the Army and had to call up reserves and National Guardsmen in numbers not seen since World War II.

Since there is virtually no coverage of the Defense Department other than the SecDef's smart-alecky news conferences, I highly recommend Johnson's new book as well as his old one, "Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of an American Empire." If you look at the original publication date of his first book, you will find that it is quite prophetic.

From whence comes the American itch to control the world? That's an interesting question. One wonders why, when Washington, D.C., is the AIDS capital of America, the president is so keen on spending American tax dollars to fight AIDS in Africa. Alas, perhaps the answer is as simple as the fact that the district has neither oil nor uranium, not to mention its habit of voting heavily Democratic.

The old Marxist answer was that as capitalists finished exploiting the domestic market, they would inevitably seek to expand overseas. I don't think the old grump foresaw the rise of global corporations, which now seek to turn the entire Earth into one domestic market — for themselves, of course.

The truth is quite simple: An empire increases the danger for the American people, as empires always make more enemies than friends, not to mention inciting envy and hatred. Maintaining an empire will eventually break us, as it has every single empire of the past.

To paraphrase a Mexican bandit in a classic movie, "I don't want no stinking empire." I want my republic back. It was cheaper to run, much freer and was viewed affectionately by the world because it minded its own business. If it means a return to KP and putting generals and admirals in the jump seats of cargo planes and in a bunk in a warship, so be it. That's little-enough hardship for generals who like to direct their wars as far from the sound of guns as possible.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © 2003 by King Features S


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: africa; aids; army; chalmersjohnson; charleyreese; coldwar; dc; defensedept; empire; kosovo; kp; learjets; luxuryjets; marxism; military; militarygolf; republic

1 posted on 01/26/2004 5:34:53 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
My commander, a Brigadier General, slept on the ground with us troops. General Murphey was always the last man in the company to go throught the chow line. He preferred to let the troops go ahead of him. You just can't make sweeping generalizations! Some commanders do abuse their position, but most are still soldiers.
2 posted on 01/26/2004 5:49:54 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
John F___ing Kerry to you, too, Reese.
3 posted on 01/26/2004 6:29:51 AM PST by Old Sarge ("I Am a Rock, I Am An Island" - Simon & Garfunkel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
Mr. Reese takes up a theme of Pat Buchanan and also Tom Chittem author of "Civil War II". We have many trappings of an empire now.

That certainly is an impressive number of private luxury jets.

4 posted on 01/26/2004 7:23:06 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I remember being impressed with Charley Reese as recently as about 1999. Not since.
5 posted on 01/26/2004 7:29:38 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
There's another difference between the old War (& Navy) Departments and Today's Pentagon: Today's DoD is chock-full of civilians perfoming tasks that, assuming those tasks existed in 1944, used to be done by uniformed personnel.
6 posted on 01/26/2004 8:01:11 AM PST by Tallguy (Does anybody really think that Saddam's captor really said "Pres. Bush sends his regards"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Today's DoD is chock-full of civilians perfoming tasks that, assuming those tasks existed in 1944, used to be done by uniformed personnel.

Yeah, it's weird how quickly it has changed.

We pulled gate guard, KP etc when I was in. I left the military in March 1998. Did my final out in Germany and went to South Africa. Came back to Europe later that year and popped by the post to say hello to my buddies. I was shocked to see that there were civilian guards on the gates.

What troubles me a little bit (even if it's a bit far fetched) is that if this trend continues, you might see a day at some point in the future when combat units themselves are companies contracted to do the job. Now, that's a bit extreme but I could easily imagine contractors taking on lots of other roles that have traditionally been done by military personnel. Things like supply clerks, mechanics, medics. This could go to the point where it was just the 'trigger pullers' who were in the military.

7 posted on 01/26/2004 8:39:50 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
"was viewed affectionately"

Uh huh. The Japanese were so tender and loving that Sunday morning.

Our enemies attack us because we have power, not because of what we do with it. Power gets in the way of the schemes of others to rule the world.

There never was an idylic past for the US. The closest we came was the second half of the 19th century. But that wasn't based on being loved by the rest of the world, it was based on being defended by the British Empire.

Which, news flash, isn't there anymore. Abandon our posts, and we will not go back to being defended by them. We will just invite 9-11s and Pearls on a larger scale, until we aren't in anybody's way anymore.

We are stuck with power. And with it both responsibility and enemies. Stop living in fantasy land and deal with it.

8 posted on 01/26/2004 8:59:00 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
What troubles me a little bit (even if it's a bit far fetched) is that if this trend continues, you might see a day at some point in the future when combat units themselves are companies contracted to do the job.

THAT has already happened in most of the world where military forces are basically just heavily-armed police. As such they are often unsuited to what armies are meant to do: commit combat. When a country with these type of forces (insert name of your favorite S.American or African country here) gets into a tight-spot with a next-door neighbor, they just call in the Pro's to augment their armed forces. Incidentally, these countries are too poor to be able to afford reserves, real training, decent equipment, or even (in extreme cases) regular salaries.

The US and other "first-world" forces are not there yet, but they are already farming out support jobs to corporations that are populated by retired military personnel.

Mercenaries by any other name...

9 posted on 01/26/2004 12:02:41 PM PST by Tallguy (Does anybody really think that Saddam's captor really said "Pres. Bush sends his regards"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson