Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger Seeks Stop to Gay Unions
MyWay News ^

Posted on 02/20/2004 11:42:09 PM PST by Happy2BMe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: little jeremiah
Noisome...

One of those old & little-used words which ought to be used more often.

Make no mistake about it, this Gay Marriage imbroglio is a dagger aimed at the heart of middle America, the traditional family, and the central set of beliefs that hold this country together.

It should have died aborning when it was first raised, laughed at, ignored, and ridiculed into extinction- but it wasn't, and now we are saddled with its ugly fallout.

We are letting a small but noxious pressure group
( my personal estimate of the gay population? 1-3%... )
dictate a policy which, if it goes through, will utterly corrupt the basis of families.

And once that is accomplished, they will not be satisfied, and will "move on" to some new and imagined grievance.

21 posted on 02/21/2004 1:40:08 AM PST by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the TrackBall into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
"The truth is Arnold made a request. He can't "order" Lockyear to do anything."

Is that the way California's constitution reads?

I was kind of hoping he'd pull a JFK on them.

You know, call out the National Guard and do the right thing at gunpoint, arresting those who resist.
22 posted on 02/21/2004 2:00:44 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Happy2BMe; MeekOneGOP; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; Shooter 2.5; 45Auto; .30Carbine; ...


Don't you in California have the "full faith and credit" of Connecticut's "shall issue" concealed handgun carry permit statutes?

If not, it appears California is breaking US Constitutional law.....






23 posted on 02/21/2004 2:02:37 AM PST by autoresponder (JAMES BOND: http://00access.tripod.com/007.html J-FK: http://00access.tripod.com/Kerry.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
This is true, but until he finally said SOMETHING to support upholding the rule of law, anyone who wanted to say something about this OUT LOUD was considered an ignorant person. He gives credibility and support to the REALITY of the situation ....of the slippery slope to anarachy the MAYOR has allowed. I hope the MAYOR is FIRED.
24 posted on 02/21/2004 2:13:51 AM PST by Meredith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
"The truth is, thousands of people are involved in loving relationships and having them recognized for the first time," Ragone said. "We urge the governor to meet with some of the couples because what's happening is both lawful and loving."

If a "loving relationship" is the basis of the argument then "marriage" will have to be granted to pedophiles and incestuous lovers. Not to mention livestock. Pro Stock too. There are a lot of people who have very loving relationships with their cars.

25 posted on 02/21/2004 2:17:06 AM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
The "Loving Relationship" argument has NOTHING to do with
the LAW.
26 posted on 02/21/2004 2:21:22 AM PST by Meredith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
according to the homosexual's brief in lawrence AT MOST homosexuals are 2.7% of the pop. Which means it is probably much less.
27 posted on 02/21/2004 2:36:49 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
according to the homosexual's brief in lawrence AT MOST homosexuals are 2.7% of the pop.

I was actually not aware of that statistic- thanks for calling it to my attention.

My own estimate is based purely on empirical, personal obsrvation- like many people my age, I rather blindly accepted Kinsey's 10% figure until I grew up and started drawing conclusions from real-world experience... and I noticed that out of every group of a hundred people I ran into, maybe 2 to 5 were gay, rather than the one in ten Kinsey's now-admittedly bogus studies suggested.

28 posted on 02/21/2004 2:43:26 AM PST by backhoe (The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Meredith
The "Loving Relationship" argument has NOTHING to do with the LAW.

You're right! The LAW is highly DISCRIMINATORY. If I love my goat I should be able to marry my goat. Where does the goobermint get off defining my love life?

29 posted on 02/21/2004 3:08:56 AM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Trueblackman; cartoonistx
This cartoon was drawn by Freeper cartoonistx. Excellent.

Wish cartoonistx could get a job at the AJC. I'm absolutely sick of Mick Luckovich's hateful, Bush-bashing cartoons.

30 posted on 02/21/2004 3:34:57 AM PST by Atlantian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Make no mistake about it, this Gay Marriage imbroglio is a dagger aimed at the heart of middle America, the traditional family, and the central set of beliefs that hold this country together.

It should have died aborning when it was first raised, laughed at, ignored, and ridiculed into extinction- but it wasn't, and now we are saddled with its ugly fallout.

We are letting a small but noxious pressure group
( my personal estimate of the gay population? 1-3%... )
dictate a policy which, if it goes through, will utterly corrupt the basis of families.

And once that is accomplished, they will not be satisfied, and will "move on" to some new and imagined grievance.


'RIGHT ON
31 posted on 02/21/2004 3:45:01 AM PST by garylmoore (It is as it was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
"I think that three volunteer freepers should get in line, and demand that all three be married. Just to lampoon them. Or a mother and son, or brothers, or sisters, or...."

...or, how about if a NAMBLA member shows up with 4 or 5 little boys and fills out an application to get married. He'd fit right in wit the other sodomites.

32 posted on 02/21/2004 4:03:01 AM PST by RushLake (Permission from the UN...we don't need no stinking permission slip from the UN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I hope it is a nice goat.
33 posted on 02/21/2004 4:04:57 AM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
I wonder if these atrocities are banned, will they declare the marriages already performed illegal? I sure hope so. I think liberals sometimes try to push their issues through fast like this thing in California and Hillarys health care fiasco and wind up shooting themselves in the foot. They are much more dangerous when they sneak in the back door. I believe this will be stopped.
34 posted on 02/21/2004 4:06:40 AM PST by beckysueb (Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sd-joe
What goat?
35 posted on 02/21/2004 4:17:50 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
And all this, abortion, partial birth abortion, the right to sodomy, homo unions, now marriage, all of them spawned from an innocuous, totally harmless Supreme Court decision. I believe it was Griswold v. Connecticut in the 1960s that resulted in the vague "right to privacy" to obtain birth control pills. The Law of Unintended Consequences and judicial tyranny in action.
36 posted on 02/21/2004 4:57:12 AM PST by Jacquerie (Democrats soil the institutions they control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I don't know, it's your goat.

Per your post: "If I love my goat I should be able to marry my goat."
37 posted on 02/21/2004 4:57:58 AM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
according to the homosexual's brief in lawrence AT MOST homosexuals are 2.7% of the pop. Which means it is probably much less.

It doesn't really matter how small a fraction of the population they are. The entire left has adopted them as pets.

38 posted on 02/21/2004 6:04:19 AM PST by Salman (Mickey Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder

Elvis "America"
(Click here or on the pic)

39 posted on 02/21/2004 6:24:22 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (The Democrats believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Barnacle; Prime Choice; JohnHuang2; MeekOneGOP; autoresponder; Salem; ...
"I think that three volunteer freepers should get in line, and demand that all three be married. Just to lampoon them. Or a mother and son, or brothers, or sisters, or....

You get the picture. Force those perverts to announce "Our chosen perversion is normal and fine, but YOUR perversion is beyond the pale!"

You laugh, but whether you know it or not, you have hit upon the national queer strategy (the timing for the completeness of it just has not arrived - it's a "gradual" invasion effect, similar to the withering away of our border with Mexico). Let's take a look for a second at the ultimate goal of queers .

Look at the fact that they want licensing not just for single (queer marriages) - but multiple partner queer (marriages).

Now we should discuss the ultimate goal of queers in America: A Queer PRESIDENT.

Outlandish, you say? Dick Cheney's daughter is a lesbian. Had Al Gore won the White House in 2000, many more queer officials, judges, magistrates, etc. would have been plugged into high offices across the land.

Do we see a pattern developing here?

It heavily infests both major political parties.

Consider Rome. Queerdom had reached it's zenith in the queer Roman Caesar Nero who relished in the open mutilation of Christians in the ampitheater and demonically laughed as Rome burned.

Consider Greece. Blazingly queer towards the last of it's zenith. Grecian queers would hold mammoth "sporting" events completely naked - so as to admire the "beauty" of the male body.

Do we see parallels developing between these fallen civilizations and America here?

Historical record proves that homosexuality is one of the few great cancers able to destroy a nation - even more powerful than the greatest military might.

History is repeating itself right before our eyes. And to the "sky is falling crowd" I say compare tolerance towards the events ongoing in S.F. and in every state in the Union to just ten years ago.

Homosexuality is just another scourge eating away at the foundation of this once great nation and beacon every bit as much as the raping of our sovereignty by losing our border controls with Mexico and Canada.

40 posted on 02/21/2004 6:54:20 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson