Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Computermaker, embrace the weird!
cs monitor ^ | april 22, 2004 | Robert C. Cowen

Posted on 04/23/2004 6:48:32 AM PDT by Bobber58

The Christian Science Monitor - csmonitor.com

from the April 22, 2004 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0422/p14s01-stct.html

Computermaker, embrace the weird!

By Robert C. Cowen

Interspecies entanglement. It might sound like a biological experiment gone wrong. Actually, it's a dream come true for physicists trying to invent an ultrafast computer.

Welcome to the quaint world of quantum physics, whose weirdness frustrates theorists but whose promise could lead to a machine able to compute in seconds what would take today's supercomputers an eternity to complete.

The key for researchers is to make use of that weirdness, starting with interspecies entanglement.

In the language of quantum physics, different "species" means different particles. That could be, say, an electrically charged atom and a photon of light.

"Entanglement" means that certain properties of those two particles - such as the spin of the atom and the polarization of the photon - are correlated. They remain linked however far apart the particles are.

Moreover, what you do to one member of the pair can determine the state of the other member. Detecting the photon's polarization determines which way the electrically charged atom (called an ion) spins. It happens instantly, even if they are at opposite ends of the universe.

Various experiments have demonstrated entanglement between quantum objects of the same species. The prize for developers of the ultracomputer has been to demonstrate entanglement between ions and light.

It's called a quantum computer because the states of quantum entities, such as the direction of an ion's spin, can represent the zeros and ones of the binary math that computers use.

That's useful, but to make a working computer, those zeros and ones have to travel. That's where the photons come in.

Photons entangled with those ions theoretically could carry that information to other parts of a computing network. B.B. Blinov and colleagues at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor now have made that kind of entanglement work between a cadmium ion and a photon.

That's a significant step in "the spectacular progress" being made toward building a quantum computer, writes Eugene Polzik with the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen in a recent issue of Nature. "The real breakthrough ... is that, for the first time, entanglement has been observed between a stationary computational [unit] (a trapped ion) and a 'flying' communication [unit] (an optical photon)."

While that's good news for quantum computer developers, it makes a larger point. Working physicists have to master the so-called quantum weirdness that they have wished they could live without.

Quantum theory's counterintuitive predictions were a background theme as 20th-century physics unfolded. They predicted such oddities as groups of atoms in which each atom is everywhere at once. Physicists could tie themselves in knots trying to understand such things. Einstein hated the notion of what he called "spooky" entanglement.

The mantra for practical researchers was "calculate, don't speculate." They used the theory's mathematical tools to develop modern chemistry and produce such wonders as computer chips and lasers. Now they must embrace its physical weirdness.

No one knows when a practical quantum computer will be developed or exactly what it will be used for.

But to quote from an overview of quantum entanglement published last year in Physics Today: "Researchers now treat [spooky] entanglement not simply as a paradoxical feature of quantum mechanics, but as a physical resource."

Full HTML version of this story which may include photos, graphics, and related links


www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2004 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.
For permission to reprint/republish this article, please email Copyright



TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: computers; huh; physics; quantumcomputer; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/23/2004 6:48:33 AM PDT by Bobber58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
Fascinating stuff, but now my brain is full. Ah well, looks like an early happy hour for me.
2 posted on 04/23/2004 7:12:21 AM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
"Spooky Entanglement"


3 posted on 04/23/2004 7:19:37 AM PDT by Bobber58 (whatever it takes, for as long as it takes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
what you do to one member of the pair can determine the state of the other member. Detecting the photon's polarization determines which way the electrically charged atom (called an ion) spins. It happens instantly, even if they are at opposite ends of the universe.
. . . and all I have to do is detect the way the atom spins, and I can receive the communication bit you sent me by detecting the photon's polarization. No need to launch a comm satelite, no propagation delay, and since I have the ion and you have the photon our communication is secure. No bandwidth limitation at all, and we don't need no stinking antennas.

4 posted on 04/23/2004 7:20:43 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (To believe in your own objectivity is to be wise in your own conceit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
No bandwidth limitation at all, and we don't need no stinking antennas . . . and how much power could it possibly require??? Your battery life is infinite!
5 posted on 04/23/2004 7:25:05 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (To believe in your own objectivity is to be wise in your own conceit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
but it remains to be seen if all spam will spin counter-quark-wise :)
6 posted on 04/23/2004 7:34:23 AM PDT by Bobber58 (whatever it takes, for as long as it takes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
Whoa.
7 posted on 04/23/2004 7:36:46 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
Coolness BUMP
8 posted on 04/23/2004 7:39:45 AM PDT by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
No bandwidth limitation at all, and we don't need no stinking antennas . . . and how much power could it possibly require??? Your battery life is infinite!

I sure can see that you are thinking of the possibilities. The ramifications of this technology are mind blowing, it makes data transference and calculation speeds reach infinite proportions.

This technology could be the most significant technological breakthrough for a very long time.

With all the real world applications that come to mind, MY mind (for some weird reason), is thinking of Star Trek and the idea of communicating instantly across countless light-years of distance. Thirty-five years ago this "instant long distance communication" was one example used to discredit Star Trek as pure fantasy. And while a lot of it is/was, it is unbelievable how much of it is coming true.

9 posted on 04/23/2004 7:47:06 AM PDT by DeSoto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
. . . and all I have to do is detect the way the atom spins, and I can receive the communication bit you sent me by detecting the photon's polarization.

Have you read the ENDER'S GAME series? This very much brings to mind the ancibles used therein. (NOTE: My spelling on story items may be wrong; I listened to the series on audiobook.) Ancibles were communication computers that allowed instantaneous communication across vast galactic distances.

Very very thrilling stuff.

MM

10 posted on 04/23/2004 7:48:22 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Not quite right.

You detect a random bit that is CORRELATED with my random bit, but it's still random and you can't use the info, yet.

But then I send you, on an insecure, public, eavesdropped channel, what my random bit was. That info is useless to everyone except you, but since you know what your random bit was and what your polarizer setting was, you can deduce what my polarizer setting was, and get a SECURE bit of information from me.

This is not useful for direct high-bandwidth communication (if it were, the communication would be faster than the speed of light and violate Einstein's theory, because what you see is influenced instantaneously by what I do), but it is ideal for cryptography, because I can send you a perfectly secure message using the combination of correlated random bits and "clear channel" transmission of the supplementary information.

11 posted on 04/23/2004 7:52:28 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Ansible. And I was just about to mention this, dammit.
12 posted on 04/23/2004 8:37:09 AM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
Cool! How about PHYLOTIC? Is that right? How about JENG CHOW?
13 posted on 04/23/2004 9:10:15 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
Looks like this is going to be a good thread.
14 posted on 04/23/2004 9:42:33 AM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MattAMiller
bttt for later read
15 posted on 04/23/2004 9:44:15 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58

16 posted on 04/23/2004 9:48:06 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
is that the formula for "duh" ?
17 posted on 04/23/2004 10:21:15 AM PDT by Bobber58 (whatever it takes, for as long as it takes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Not too sure on those. I read several in the series, and they turned rather bland. However, a much more recent book was written, about Bean, called Ender's Shadow. I highly recommend it. It's the origin of Bean and what happened from his perspective during Ender's Game.
18 posted on 04/23/2004 10:42:22 AM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
I'm reading SHADOW PUPPETS right now, which follows Bean after the Bugger Wars. I'll probably finish it, but it's terrible.

MM
19 posted on 04/23/2004 12:50:46 PM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Yes, I think I read the book after that - boring as hell. ENder's shadow was great though.
20 posted on 04/23/2004 1:04:13 PM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson