Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official Ebert review of Moore film
Chicago Sun Times

Posted on 06/24/2004 8:01:40 AM PDT by Borges

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: Dane
Tose'-Rigell, who was at Bush's side, did not hear what White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card whispered when he squeezed past her to tell the president of the attacks, but "I knew it was something serious."

My guess: After informing the President that America was under attack, Card probably said something like:

"We know there are a couple more airborne airliners that have been hijacked, so just sit tight while the Secret Service re-arranges your exit path to Air Force One, where we are already mobilizing your flying NCA or 'Airborne White House'. It will also take a few minutes to get the armed combat airCAP F-16s in place to protect you, our CIC, while we get you to a secure military site."

Inaction? Paralysis? Bull$#|+!!!

Seven minutes to put the nation on secured war footing -- especially with the President "out of pocket" and surrounded by vulnerable children is pretty impressive! And the fact that Bush maintained control while letting the system work is impressive management technique.

Neither Moore nor Ebert would recognize competence if it bit them on their fat @$$3$...!!!

61 posted on 06/24/2004 9:32:56 AM PDT by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: grellis
Inexplicable? It may not be the correct explanation but I have always thought that, perhaps, President Bush didn't want to freak out a bunch of schoolchildren.

I think Ebert's watched too many re-runs of Independence Day, and thinks Bush should have run from the school, jumped into an F-16 and flew off personally to intercept the nearest 767.

62 posted on 06/24/2004 9:36:17 AM PDT by dirtboy (John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

i wouldnt be suprised if they played it at the convention!! lol

honestly, i think the people that go and see this were never gonna vote for bush in the first place. foxnews has done a good job disputing some of the non-facts in it..and thier viewership is more than cnn and msnbc combined... that goes along way... if demoncrats want to align themselves with radicals, then so be it... this is just a rare week..with bill, monica, and michael in the headlines... its too rich... is this all they got? they rely on scandal for media coverage...thats speaks loudly.


63 posted on 06/24/2004 10:02:41 AM PDT by beansox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: I_killed_kenny

At least he didn't pick his nose.


64 posted on 06/24/2004 10:31:28 AM PDT by grellis ("I was just wondering, do you filthy Freepers know how well-known and notorious you are?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Borges

So the Democrats are now angry at Bush because he likes kids enough to hang out with them for seven minutes.

"Oh, please brer' Democrats, don't tell anyone that the president also likes puppies, mom, and apple pie!"


65 posted on 06/24/2004 10:32:11 AM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: megatherium
You sure about that? I have been wondering if the president had just been informed of the FIRST plane hitting the WTC. I was watching TV live for the 20 minutes or so between crashes and wasn't sure it was a terrorist attack (nor were the announcers BTW) until the SECOND plane hit. I was more than a little concerned as to how an airliner could hit the WTC when it was "clear and a million". But seven minutes under this scenario wouldn't be so odd.
66 posted on 06/24/2004 11:01:06 AM PDT by americafirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; Paradox

67 posted on 06/24/2004 11:14:35 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Ni Jesus, Ni Marx..OUI REAGAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

LOL! Very appropriate art indeed!


68 posted on 06/24/2004 11:19:34 AM PDT by Paradox (Occam was probably right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Borges
...and only Moore thought to contact the teacher in that schoolroom

Of course, that fat scumbag Moore did NOT bother to contact (or maybe contacted and chose to ignore) the school PRINCIPAL in that classroom who said:

"I don't think anyone could have handled it better," Tose'-Rigell told the Sarasota Herald-Tribune in a story published Wednesday. "What would it have served if he had jumped out of his chair and ran out of the room?"

And of course the OTHER fat liberal scumbag, Ebert, doesn't bother with this little problem either.

By the way, "Borges", welcome to Free Republic.
Isn't it fun exposing the lies and hypocrisy of the scumbag Democrats?
It's almost too easy..

69 posted on 06/24/2004 11:27:25 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Sarasota principal defends Bush from "Fahrenheit 9/11" portrayal

Excerpts:

Michael Moore's film "Fahrenheit 9/11" criticizes President Bush for listening to Sarasota second-graders read a story for nearly seven minutes after learning the nation was under attack on Sept. 11, 2001.

But Gwendolyn Tose'-Rigell, the principal at Emma E. Booker Elementary School, says Bush handled himself properly.

"I don't think anyone could have handled it better," Tose'-Rigell told the Sarasota Herald-Tribune in a story published Wednesday. "What would it have served if he had jumped out of his chair and ran out of the room?"

~snip~

She said the video doesn't convey all that was going on in the classroom, but Bush's presence had a calming effect and "helped us get through a very difficult day."

Tose'-Rigell said she plans to publish her account of the morning of Sept. 11 from pages she wrote in her journal following the attack. The principal said she didn't vote for Bush. "But that day I would have voted for him."

70 posted on 06/24/2004 12:08:17 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I DESPISE the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
It's vintage Moore, for example, when he brings along an unsuspecting Marine recruiter as he confronts congressmen, urging them to have their children enlist in the service.

One of those congressman has said Moore shows him in the movie but doesn't show his answer.

Moore approaches and asked for his help in recruiting the children of Congress. The man's answer that was left out was that his nephew was going to Iraq (he doesn't have children).

I wonder if Moore makes approving mention of Ashcroft's son and nephew being over there or that a higher percentage of Congressional progeny are serving than compared to the nation as a whole...nevermind, I know the answer is 'NO'.

71 posted on 06/24/2004 12:11:24 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I DESPISE the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
The war itself Moore considers unjustified (no WMDs, no Hussein-bin Laden link),

Stay tuned on the WMD issue (which has been changed by the left to mean he must have vast stockpiles to count).

As to bin Laden and Saddam? Even the 9/11 commission found a link.

72 posted on 06/24/2004 12:13:26 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I DESPISE the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

ebert is a big fat lady


73 posted on 06/24/2004 12:15:12 PM PDT by petercooper (In the end, the Democrats are really just a herd of jackasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
We are all familiar with the controversy over the 2000 election, which was settled by the U.S. Supreme Court.

What was "settled" was that the Florida Supremes overstepped their bounds. It is they who tried to change the rules retroactively.

Count after count had been done, each and every one with George W. Bush the winner. How the man winning the most votes can be considered by some yahoos as "not the legitimate president" is a mystery only a liberal mind could conceive of.

74 posted on 06/24/2004 12:17:25 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I DESPISE the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
"Fahrenheit 9/11" is a compelling, persuasive film,

It is one outrageous lie after another.

Pathetic and sick, but if it's your cup of tea, drink up!

75 posted on 06/24/2004 12:18:55 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I DESPISE the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grellis
Inexplicable? It may not be the correct explanation but I have always thought that, perhaps, President Bush didn't want to freak out a bunch of schoolchildren.

That was the thought of those actually in the room, there at the time. See my post #70.

76 posted on 06/24/2004 12:21:14 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I DESPISE the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: megatherium
By the way, the loony-tunes left is trading in theories that Bush's apparent lack of concern, reading to school children for seven minutes, shows he knew in advance that the attack was going to happen.

We know that. This is old news. As Chris Hitchens correctly points out, had President Bush up and run from the room instantly, then THAT would be what they would point to as proof he "knew" it "was on". Or they'd simply say he scared the kids and rattled easily and he did not demonstrate cool and calm under stress (which he did).

Please read my link and excerpts at post 70 for the thoughts of someone in the room at the time.

77 posted on 06/24/2004 12:27:16 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I DESPISE the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

And the Bagcams.

We all watched reporters primp and rehearse beforehand. I assume they, like the administration, are aware the feed is there, but count on it not getting airtime over the actual teevee, (until someone like Moore decides to humiliate somebody like Wolfowitz or President Bush).


78 posted on 06/24/2004 12:29:40 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I DESPISE the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

I ran out of words at 6:12 this morning. Sorry.


79 posted on 06/24/2004 12:30:31 PM PDT by Deb (A "Filthy Freeper" since 1996!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Borges; All
"THE ETERNAL LIBERAL"

I can't to see Ebert's review of that.

80 posted on 06/24/2004 12:35:16 PM PDT by expatguy (Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson