Dobson is a charleton. Always has been, always will be.
1980 2001 Cyprus a/ 0.6 2.3 Greece b/ 1.5 3.9 Azerbaijan 3.0 6.6 San Marino a/ 3.3 8.6 Croatia 5.1 9.4 Italy a/ 4.3 9.7 Macedonia 6.1 10.4 Switzerland 4.7 11.4 Poland 4.8 13.1 Armenia 4.3 15.3 Spain a/ 3.9 17.7 Ukraine 8.8 18.0 Slovakia 5.7 19.8 Serbia and Mont 10.1 20.4 Belarus 6.4 20.5 Moldova a/ 7.4 20.5 Luxembourg 6.0 22.3 Germany a/ 11.9 23.4 Czech Republic 5.6 23.5 Portugal 9.2 23.8 Lithuania 6.3 25.4 Romania a/ 2.8 26.7 Netherlands 4.1 27.2 Russian Fed 10.8 28.8 Hungary 7.1 30.3 Ireland 5.0 31.2 Austria 17.8 33.1 United States 18.4 33.2 Slovenia 13.1 39.4 Finland 13.1 39.5 United Kingdom 11.5 40.1 Bulgaria 10.9 42.0 Latvia 12.5 42.1 France a/ 11.4 42.6 Georgia 4.7 44.4 Denmark 33.2 44.6 Norway 14.5 49.7 Sweden 39.7 55.5 Estonia 18.3 56.2 Iceland a/ 39.7 65.2
So you're not only a know-it-all, you're also a prophet?
the research that Dobson cites is not his own. It was presented to Congress and is also presented by National Review. What the author did (cant remember the name) was look at marraige rates before and after acceptance of homosexual marraige/partnerships. He found that scandanavians usually got married after the first kid. Once homosexual unions became accepted, there is no pretense of getting married at all in these countries. I'll find the article and post the link.
***And below is the actual hard data ***
Source?
And by the way, thats "charlatan". :-}
See the article by Stanly Kurtz in the Weekly Standard
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/660zypwj.asp
The End of Marriage in Scandinavia
The "conservative case" for same-sex marriage collapses.
by Stanley Kurtz
02/02/2004, Volume 009, Issue 20
**And below is the actual hard data for Europe and the US on percentage of out-of-wedlock births.**
I appreciate your research on this point. I have read the article you posted and looked at your statistics. I'll look into it further (including read your article jwalsh07 - thanks).
However, rising rates of out-of-wedlock births in Scandanavian countries aside. I think Dobson has some very compelling reasons to believe that same-sex unions are dangerous. Even if Dobson made an error in this (and I'm not sure if he has). You must agree that putting a hole in one part of one point of an eleven point argument is not sufficient to crumble it.