Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon challenges Rockefeller on Feith hit
Washington Times ^ | Wednesday, July 14, 2004 | By Rowan Scarborough

Posted on 07/14/2004 12:12:36 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

The Pentagon is accusing Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV of distorting the intelligence work of its No. 3 civilian official, and calling on the Democrat to prove his charges or retract them.
    It is unusual for the Pentagon to formally take on a sitting senator. In this case, the challenge came in a letter to Mr. Rockefeller on Friday from Powell A. Moore, the assistant secretary of defense for legislative affairs.
    "On behalf of the department, I request that, if you have any evidence supporting the serious charge you floated during your press conference, you provide it to the department," Mr. Moore wrote to Mr. Rockefeller of West Virginia, ranking Democrat on the Senate SelectCommittee on Intelligence,who has emerged as one of the Senate's fiercest critics of President Bush.
    "If there is not evidence, then a retraction and apology would be appropriate," said the letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Times.
    Last year, Mr. Rockefeller was embarrassed when one of his staff's strategy papers leaked to the press. The paper talked of how Democrats would work with Republicans to get a critical report on the Bush administration and pre-Iraq war intelligence, then continue to exploit the issue no matter what the report's conclusions.
     Mr. Rockefeller criticized the Pentagon official on Friday, the same day the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released the report on prewar intelligence findings on Iraq to which the leaked memo referred.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaida; dod; dougfeith; electionpolitics; feithmemo; iraq; jayrockefeller; memos; moore; powellamoore; rats; rockefeller; rockefellermemo; senateintelligence; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2004 12:12:36 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Rockefeller's moronic accusations don't suprise me - but seeing him called on it - THAT'S suprising!


2 posted on 07/14/2004 12:15:36 AM PDT by Az. Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Holy cow! This just could be something fun to keep an eye on.What a slap down! :-)


3 posted on 07/14/2004 12:17:55 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Washington Times!! Getting the TRUTH out!!


4 posted on 07/14/2004 12:19:08 AM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Fingers crossed to bring this freaking moron to his knees.


5 posted on 07/14/2004 12:24:23 AM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay
Good Ad too:


6 posted on 07/14/2004 12:32:17 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

For someone to issue an apology presuppose a degree of integrity or shame. The Democrat party has neither. Character assassination has now become a campaign tactic and a talking point and has become so inbred into this party that only a crushing defeat at the polls might cure it-like a doctor cutting out a cancerous lesion.


7 posted on 07/14/2004 1:47:17 AM PDT by Larry381 (The Democratic Party-Celebrating 60 years of aid and comfort to America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Is that sign, Rockefeller's license plate on his SUV? Demopimps always lie, it's just in their blood. Bush/Cheney 2004.


8 posted on 07/14/2004 6:12:15 AM PDT by No Surrender No Retreat (These Colors Never Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; StriperSniper; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...

PING............................


9 posted on 07/15/2004 7:56:16 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; 1Mike; 3catsanadog; ~Vor~; ~Kim4VRWC's~; A CA Guy; A Citizen Reporter; abner; ...

Ping for something you may miss on the news!


10 posted on 07/15/2004 8:11:50 AM PDT by Howlin (John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Especially if your news comes from someplace not named FOX or the Washington Times.


11 posted on 07/15/2004 8:22:29 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Good for the Pentagon. The gloves are slowly coming off.


12 posted on 07/15/2004 8:22:51 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
"If there is not evidence, then a retraction and apology would be appropriate," said the letter,

Hmmmmm....sounds something like what Bond said this morning. This could be a very enjoyable pattern. :)

13 posted on 07/15/2004 8:27:40 AM PDT by StriperSniper ("Ronald Reagan, the Founding Father of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy." - Mark Levin 6/8/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Hey Rockerfeller! Ya feel it now?


14 posted on 07/15/2004 8:45:12 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Become a Monthly Donor, and the Harp Seal gets it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

BOO YAH! Another 'go f_ck yourself' slap down for the dims.


15 posted on 07/15/2004 8:52:12 AM PDT by rintense (Kerry/Edwards: Two Johns to screw America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rintense

Put up or shut up moment, which I hope lasts longer!


16 posted on 07/15/2004 8:57:39 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
I did not suggest that Mr. Feith has broken a criminal statute. Rather our 'concern' is that some activities of his office may not have been in compliance with the law.

And the difference is ????

17 posted on 07/15/2004 9:17:58 AM PDT by Mo1 (50 States .... I want all 50 States come November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I did not suggest that Mr. Feith has broken a criminal statute.

OH, so "UNLAWFUL" has had it's meaning changed????

18 posted on 07/15/2004 9:25:54 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
They seem to have a habit of changing the definition of words to their liking
19 posted on 07/15/2004 9:38:34 AM PDT by Mo1 (50 States .... I want all 50 States come November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; William McKinley

fyi


20 posted on 07/15/2004 10:56:44 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson