Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/14/2004 10:35:01 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Willie Green

Gay marriage is wrong. What about civil unions? Gay 'marriage' in a strictly legal sense is fine with me.


2 posted on 07/14/2004 10:41:35 AM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
There is good evidence that societal approval of homosexual practice may increase the incidence of homosexuality and bisexuality, not just homosexual practice.

Which is already happening in the teen and early twenties crowd. It's sad.

3 posted on 07/14/2004 10:44:57 AM PDT by King Black Robe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Marriage from the Creator of Holy Matrimony's point of view

Marriage is to be between one man and one woman....end of story....anything else puts us in the hands of an angry God....

5 posted on 07/14/2004 11:04:27 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

The author loses the argument when he cites Genesis, seeing that the Bible is now considered "hate" speech.

Religion has been so skillfully driven from our society, Truth doesn't stand a chance....


6 posted on 07/14/2004 11:07:53 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

simple no matter how much they try, two homosexual men, or two homosexual women , will not get pregnent from their recreational sex.

Society rewards the insititution not the individuals.

Homosexuals seek to have the institution reward the individuals orgasm.


7 posted on 07/14/2004 11:09:02 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
Those who say "civil unions are OK with them" are ignorant of the ramifications of such unions.
If civil unions between 2 men or 2 woman are permitted by law, why not a union between 18 men, or 3 women and an Irish Wolfhound, or a father and his son, etc.?
Since the beginning of civilization, the standard for marriage has been a bond between 1 man and 1 woman. If that standard is changed, you can be sure children will pay the price.
Are you sure you want to open Pandora's Box just so somebody can "marry" their same-sex best friend?
8 posted on 07/14/2004 11:11:48 AM PDT by bimboeruption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

Marriage is about children- not about sex. If it was only about sex then I would have many, many wives....

Besides- what does anal sex have to do with marriage?


11 posted on 07/14/2004 11:27:07 AM PDT by Porterville (Fight Communism, vote Republican- and piss on france)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
"Gay marriage," as the ultimate legal sanctioning of homosexual behavior, will bring with it a wave of intolerance toward those who publicly express disapproval of homosexual practice.

I think that wave is already here. A Swedish pastor got jail time for speaking out against homosexuality at his pulpit (posted here).

13 posted on 07/14/2004 11:36:59 AM PDT by tuesday afternoon (Everything happens for a reason. - 40 and 43)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

Gay marriage is our punishment for turning our backs on God.


35 posted on 07/14/2004 12:46:04 PM PDT by biblewonk (WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK...AND I USE IT TOO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
My local fishwrap, the Los Angeles Times in an editorial today, came out openly in favor of gay marriage. That's how Hard Leftist they are. When you consider 61% of Californians voted to protect marriage, it tells you who is out of step with the mainstream.
36 posted on 07/14/2004 12:49:35 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

Forget about the Bible for a moment, and consider the argument from a purely objective, humanistic point of view: Anything that, if practiced by everyone, would either destroy or harm humanity or that would create social anarchy is bad and/or wrong. It's really a very simple argument. What would happen if everyone stole from their neighbors? What would happen if all people were gay? What would happen if all people lied?

Government should only pass laws and encourage behavior which furthers the peacable proliferation of the human race. Based on this nonreligious argument, gay marriage is wrong.

Case closed.


43 posted on 07/14/2004 1:07:39 PM PDT by DennisR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Statement: "'Gay marriage' is wrong"

Response: Yep!

Comment: So what? (not directed at you merely the indifference of elected office holders.)

51 posted on 07/14/2004 5:58:12 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Everything about this issue is wrong, beginning with the Boston courts. No state legislature has voted to allow gay marriages or to recognize other states. The only state that has voted to allow civil unions was Vermont and that was because of what the courts did.
57 posted on 08/26/2004 1:17:16 PM PDT by THE MODERATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson