Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indep. Police Stage Roadblock To Check Driver's Licenses
Kansas City Channel 9 ^ | 7-15-2004

Posted on 07/19/2004 1:29:52 PM PDT by JOAT

INDEPENDENCE, Mo. -- Police in Independence conducted a driver checkpoint on Thursday, but it wasn't to look for drunken drivers.

For about an hour Thursday afternoon, officers stopped vehicles to make sure drivers had valid licenses. But some are questioning the legality of holding such a checkpoint.

Independence police have arrested more than 1,300 drivers this year for driving without a valid license, KMBC's Jim Flink reported. On Thursday, police stopped about 300 drivers on a busy street.

Independence Officer Tom Gentry said drivers without licenses pose a safety concern.

"It's a public safety issue. On public highways, you don't want illegal drivers out there who might pose a grave danger," he said.

But Gentry added there are other reasons for wanting to make the stops.

"People who don't bother to get their driver's license or get them renewed -- usually that's an indicator of other problems as well," Gentry said.

Independence officers issued 10 tickets on Thursday, and they also arrested four people on outstanding warrants and one person for possession of narcotics and drug paraphernalia.

But Dick Kurtenback, of the American Civil Liberties Union, said he's troubled by police stopping drivers for this type of search.

"This bothers me -- they're conducting general searches without probable cause," he said. "I think the problem there is they're changing some essential aspects of this country's character, and I think it's troublesome that they're doing that."

Kurtenbach said the searches may violate people's Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure. Some drivers with whom Flink spoke agreed.

"For public safety, I think it's all right. But it does kind of bother me, in the sense that I think it's an invasion of my personal liberty," driver T.K. Shiao said.

But motorist Jan Huff-Soper thought police were doing the right thing.

"It sounds like they have a lot of people driving without licenses, and I would hope people driving out there would have valid licenses," she said.

Police said the number of arrests this year proves the roadblocks work. The police department is basing its use of checkpoints on a Supreme Court case that allows DUI roadblocks in the interest of public safety.

Kurtenbach said drivers without licenses aren't inherently dangerous, even if they are breaking the law.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 4thamendment; biggovernment; billofrights; fakeconservatives; freedomlost; governmentassavior; privacy; rino; sheeple; statism; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator

To: OPERSYST4
Oooh, you really know how to debate. So impressive. HA.

Leave the discussion to the adults from now on, okay junior?

102 posted on 07/19/2004 4:37:05 PM PDT by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: traumer
Papieren, bitte...

In Mexico it would be "Los papeles por favor".
In France it would be "Les papiers s'il vous plaît".
In Italy it would be "Le carte per favore".
In Holland it would be "Papieren alstublieft".
In Norway it would be "Papirer behager".

103 posted on 07/19/2004 4:45:57 PM PDT by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JOAT

The four million dead Americans is a AQ goal, not my hysteria. The discussion was simply: at what point of carnage does one demand agressive police action to find the terrorists in our midst. It has nothing to do with my gender or my valor. Your insults along those lines are just plain foolish.


104 posted on 07/19/2004 5:10:14 PM PDT by Imagine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; chuckwalla
El gato, chuckwalla-- you are both right according to the SCOTUS: link

I apologize-- the original case was an Illinois case where the SC of Illinois said you could not do a roadblock for one purpose and then nab someone for another.

Pressed by our "Justice" dept, the SCOTUS ruled that the Illinois interpretation of the 4th Amendment was incorrect.

Frankly, I'm not sure then which rule applies here in the Land o'Rats, err, Land o'Lincoln.

105 posted on 07/19/2004 6:13:12 PM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson