Posted on 07/20/2004 5:19:00 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
FRESNO, Calif. (AP) - More than a dozen dairies in California are building contraptions to turn one of their least-valued products - the gases that rise from decomposing manure - into one of the state's most sought-after commodities - energy. The state's 1.72 million dairy cows, clustered heavily in the Central Valley, have made California the country's top dairy state. Their milk and cream sell for more than $4 billion a year, and the industry brings jobs and tax revenue to counties with double-digit unemployment.
But according to air officials, the state's cows also contribute about 10 percent of the chemical compounds that combine in the atmosphere to produce ozone, a principal component in the smog that plagues the San Joaquin Valley's air.
By capturing the offending gases of dairy air, farmers are not only reducing the emissions that cloud the valley, but cutting their own electricity costs. The decidedly low-tech technology also has the potential to play a role, albeit a small one, in meeting the state's constant hunger for new power sources.
To produce energy, the farmer has to scrape up the manure, mix it with water, and pour it into a lagoon typically covered by an enormous plastic bag. When the mixture is heated, it produces methane, which is trapped by the bag, piped into a generator, and burned to create electricity.
The experiment comes a time when the agriculture industry is having to abide by air pollution regulations for the first time. By the end of the month, the local air district is expected to issue guidelines for clean-air technology that will be required in new dairies - and so-called "methane digesters" are part of the solution, officials said.
"This is probably one of the best forms of emission control from dairies," said Dave Warner, who leads the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District's permit program.
But what really got farmers interested, they said, was that the machines literally turn manure into money.
Ron Koetsier, who has 1,200 dairy cows on 160 acres near Visalia in Tulare County, invested about $1 million to get a digester built in 1985.
The technology back then proved a disappointment, he said, but the idea was a good one. When he qualified for a matching grant from the state, he retrofitted the system and since 2002 has been saving about $30,000 a year on energy costs - about half his annual bill - because he can now produce most of the energy he needs onsite.
Once his digester is hooked up to the local utility company, Koetsier said he'll be able to bank energy with the company. When he feeds excess energy into the system, his electricity meter will run backward and he will be able to withdraw what he needs when his demand increases or his power production runs low.
He eventually expects to save about 75 percent of his total energy costs, reducing the bill to about $15,000 a year.
Methane digesters won't produce enough energy to make a significant dent in the state's energy demand - or even come close, experts said.
Manure from one cow can generate up to two kilowatts per day - enough to brighten two light bulbs, said Warner, and it takes a dozen cows to power an average house.
Even if all of the 65 billion pounds of manure produced in California every year went into a methane digester, the energy generated could only power a medium-sized town like Modesto.
But the other advantages - allowing farmers to save money, trapping gases and other chemicals that would have turned into harmful pollutants, and reducing the volume of animal waste - make the machines an alternative supported by environmentalists as well.
"We've been advocating for years the use of anaerobic digesters, or other 'cover and capture' technology," said Brent Newell, with the environmental advocacy group Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment. "It's definitely beneficial."
Legislation that in 2001 set aside grant money that farmers could apply for, then match with their own cash, has contributed to the recent growth in the system's popularity. Each one of the 14 participating dairymen got up to $431,000.
Their gamble is being closely watched by other dairy farmers.
As of July 1, all farms and dairies that emit more than 12.5 tons per year of gases that contribute to smog had to apply for local air quality permits and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. For the first time, 1,350 of the largest farms and dairies in the nation's most productive farm counties were asked to account for the air pollution they produce.
While existing dairies have to apply for operating permits from the local air district, dairies built from now on will have to use the best control technology available, Warner said.
As long as cleaning the air is also economically feasible, farmers are ready to enlist in the struggle, they said.
"Yeah, it's going to clean the air," said Larry Castelanelli, a third-generation farmer who milks 1,500 cows near Lodi and pays an annual utilities bill that tops $100,000. "Yeah, there's a concern there. But this is dollar driven. I'm competitive. I'm trying to survive in the dairy industry."
---
On the Net:
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District: http://www.valleyair.org
To learn about methane digesters: http://www.suscon.org/dairies/methanedigesters.asp
Bubba has been doing the same thing for years. It's called giving a speech.
$$$$$$$$$ it's back to the horse and buggy?
There's a dairy up here that generates enough electricity this way that they can sell some of it back to the electric company.
LQ
Yeah...right.
I thought the article suggested his total bill had been $60k, and he was saving $45k/year...still a 20+ year undertaking.
I guess if the residue can be used as fertilizer without further processing, you might have another revenue stream.
My neighbor here in Bavaria has been doing the same thing for some years but it only makes economic sense if subsidized, a concept not foreign to European farming.
These people are just pulling our chain, right? How are they heating this lagoon? The enormous plastic bag is probably oil based, the methane is piped by existing electrical power no doubt, and what is left? A lagoon full of cow$hit.
They should just shove a hose where the sun don't shine in all their cow's and decrease the overhead, it makes more sense.
Thank's, but I'll keep my day job!
You can't spread manure on a field if the run off could enter a stream or the Water Quality Control Board will be on you with big fines. Did it say each of those systems received nearly a half million dollars of our tax money...
Only in America.
The system produces its own heat. In cold climates, it is also used to heat the barns in winter. The system produces its own electricity. What is left is both solid and liquid waste. The solid waste is dried and used for animal bedding and the liquid is a high quality low odor fertilizer sprayed on fields.
Basically what this does is keep pollutants, like bacteria, out of the water system, turn a liability into an asset, and make farmers more independent. How could that be bad?
he saves 30,000 a year on a piece of equipment that cost 1 million + a federal grant that is not spelled out. That means it only takes 25 years for the investment to pay off.
You are assuming that what was true almost 20 years ago is true today.
Ron Koetsier, who has 1,200 dairy cows on 160 acres near Visalia in Tulare County, invested about $1 million to get a digester built in 1985.
Technology has improved since 1985 and costs have come down.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/05/14/BAGJG6LG3R15.DTL
The Straus Farms' covered-lagoon methane generator, powered by methane billowing off a covered pool of decomposing bovine waste, is expected to save the operation between $5,000 and $6,000 per month in energy costs. With those savings, Straus estimates he will pay back his capital investment in two to three years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.