Skip to comments.
Nuclear arms reportedly found in Iraq
UP
| july 21 2004
| UPI
Posted on 07/21/2004 5:52:33 AM PDT by NY Catholic
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-228 next last
To: ItsTheMediaStupid
61
posted on
07/21/2004 6:07:31 AM PDT
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: Conservative til I die
yes, beware of UPI stories in general. Just because news is "good" doesn't make it "true"
To: NY Catholic
63
posted on
07/21/2004 6:07:39 AM PDT
by
Momaw Nadon
(Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
To: NY Catholic
If true, I am a little sad because this will pre-empt the Sandy saga and I wanted to hear about his sox a few more days.
Oh well...
To: NY Catholic
What, exactly, is a "nuclear head". That's not a nuclear warhead is it? Is that some kind of depleted uranium penetrating warhead? Call me sceptical at this point.
65
posted on
07/21/2004 6:08:15 AM PDT
by
12B
To: NY Catholic
I got yer steenkin' WMD right here!
66
posted on
07/21/2004 6:08:35 AM PDT
by
mhking
(John Kerry & Al Gore: Cut from the same tree.)
To: Lazamataz
LOL - you obviously got hold of an early edition. Sadly, it's probably close to the truth.
To: cripplecreek
refuse to get excited over these early reports. We've been burned too many times. Me too! I'm waiting to hear what are guys over there are saying, but good grief, if this is true.....
68
posted on
07/21/2004 6:08:48 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
To: Lazamataz
If this report is confirmed, and that's a big "IF," how long do you suppose it'll be before the Dims start suggesting that these nukes are a "plant" by the Bush team?
69
posted on
07/21/2004 6:09:15 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: NY Catholic
Excellent!
Every thinking person knows they were there somewhere.........just a matter of time.
More will be found, and the dims will look stupider and stupider and stupider.......
70
posted on
07/21/2004 6:09:46 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: Just mythoughts
Does this have something to do with the Libyian statement that they were the base for Saddam's stuff?
71
posted on
07/21/2004 6:09:57 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: NY Catholic
This will get zero coverage on the nets.
72
posted on
07/21/2004 6:10:05 AM PDT
by
veronica
(Hate-triotism, the religion of leftists, liberals, anti-semites, and other cranks...)
To: Lazamataz
Technical analysis will show the Iraqi designs to be duds, so Bush still lied. < / sarcasm>
73
posted on
07/21/2004 6:10:09 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
To: joesnuffy
I believe the Wash Times said they were under 6 or so meters of concrete so were undetectable.
Not that hard to hide if that is the case. There could be many more.
To: Redbob
Iran has already run several stories claiming the US has been planting WMD's. Here's their proof!
75
posted on
07/21/2004 6:10:49 AM PDT
by
Flightdeck
(Procrastinate later)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
To: cripplecreek
I refuse to get excited over these early reports. We've been burned too many times Agreed. What is a "nuclear head" by the way? Sounds like they took a report verbatim that was badly translated. For all we know, it could mean they found a nuclear warhead or head cheese...
77
posted on
07/21/2004 6:11:26 AM PDT
by
Fury
To: dawn53
And if they store them straight up, we'll never find a stockpile!!!!!!!
78
posted on
07/21/2004 6:11:51 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: 12B
What, exactly, is a "nuclear head". That's not a nuclear warhead is it? Is that some kind of depleted uranium penetrating warhead? Call me skeptical at this point. I'm a bit dubious too. However, I don't think by any stretch depleted uranium heads can accurately be called nuclear. But it certainly is possible that the warheads are dirty bombs - Saddam might have gotten hold of some radioactive material and stuck it on the head of a conventional bomb. Even so, I'd certainly say that qualifies as a WMD.
To: Bikers4Bush
No. Just ask the NYT. The 30 sarin shells are not WMD.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-228 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
