It was statutory rape. It isn't anymore. End of story.
I suspect that the feelings may not be reciprocated in, oh, eight years or so, when Vili is 27 and Mary Kay is 50.
If the teacher had been male and the student female this question would never even come up.
That's already been adjudicated.
You know.....the kind of low-life anti-heroes the American people love to read about and slobber over..
Leni
I feel sorry for her ex-husband. The humiliation of being tossed aside for a 12 year old boy must be awful.
IMHO the woman is a nutjob.
LQ
It was Molestation, and Rape. If the victim were a girl and the the predator a male, we would be calling him a fricking pervert. Many states have laws that state that if you have sex with a minor (any one under 18 and more than three years younger than the accused) its a statutory rape, but if they are under a certain age in Texas it is 14, it ups the offense considerably (from sexual assault to aggravated sexual assault.) I don't know what the age was in the state where this crime was commited but that is besides the point. He was just a twelve year old boy a sixth grader! Of course he "loved " his teacher, at his age if you have big boobs that's all it takes. The fact that he wants to get with her now is typical in molestation cases, many victims continue to desire the perps. in some way, doesn't make it right, but since he is no longer a minor, and he doesn't mind being with some one that much older I guess they should go for it.
This woman is a nut and so is her stupid little boyfriend.
IMO , right now she probably feels she has to return to him or all "they" went thru will have been for nothing but he isn't forbidden anymore and I think she'll lose interest.
The only thing I learned from this story is The New York Post is eager to use sex to sell newspapers ... and that isn't new either.
This can only mean trouble. This lady is nuttier than squirel poop. Some day soon, Junior is going to meet a sweet young thing, and dump granny. My guess is she'll go completely over the bend and do something drastic.
I have read and heard alot about this case. I know both sides of the story, i have seen MaryKay speak her mind on tv. I dont agree with her pleas. Everyone knows shes sick in the head, its a chemical imbalance. No one knows why or can control how a person thinks. I personally dont see what a person can be attracted to when theyre 34 and their partner is 13, its too much of a parent relationship. Note that I dont oppose older men dating younger women, or vise versa but however, theres a line not to cross, no matter how mature you think the 13year old is. maybe your IMMATURITY matches their maturity level. My partner is 13 years my senior BUT I did not have relations with him prior to 18. So the maturity level was not so different as if it were a 13 year old and a 34 year old.
I believe that Mary kay should be ordered not to have contact with villi even if she served a sentance. its just not right. Regardless if they bore children or not, villi was a victim in the case and if he is a victim then why should the offender be allowed to contact the victim if she committed a lude act of sexual intent and was prisoned for it? doesnt that defeat the purpose of why she was imprisoned? if the justice system does not demand marykay not to see her victim then theres no reason they should have prosecuted it because shes just seeing the guy anyway. its all screwed up and someone should do something about it.