Posted on 09/16/2004 1:52:12 PM PDT by Spackidagoosh
Edited on 09/16/2004 2:17:33 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Each government agency has its own FOIA requirements and exceptions; they're probably broadly alike, but they should be requested under the proper provision of the USC. It wouldn't have gone to court unless the request to the NG or the Pentagon or whatever had been refused.
I believe that this is the judge who made a terrible ruling for the druggies involve.
There was so much heat on impeaching him, he changed his opinion. Even the Clintoon may have acted against this judge.
I couldn't find out who appointed him in my searches.
It is interesting that today, GW has nominated a replacement for him.
Thats exactly what they are doing, they are overstepping the privacy act and endangering other service men.
This judge's name rings a bell. He was definitely called on the carpet by O'Reilly for some real lefty ruling. I remember thinking this judge was nuts.
He is a Clinton appointee.
I know, but I'm trying to determine the extent of the overreach being attempted.
Did this judge order OTHERS records to be searched as well for the *possibility* they contained info on G.W.? The statement isn't clear. It isn't legal either way, but even more damning if a judge ordered a witchhunt into all service members records.
Exactly!!!
I think this is a big nothing. The AP got the documents that they requested. They did not find anything "juicy" so they have told the judge that they have not got what they want. So, the judge agrees and creates this order.
President Bush: "Take a memo. Dear Judge: As we say in Texas.......pound sand. Your pink slip is in the mail. Enjoy your retirement. I Remain, George W. Bush, President of the United States, and by God Don't You Forget It."
This time they might have learned how to fake them better, though.
They have probably learned a lot this past week.
And Dan's CBS Offices are probably full of Bush records. Where are Kerry's missing records.
Judge ORDERS? I'm sure this is authorized somewhere in the Constitution. Must be in one of those new secret pnumbral clauses I've been reading about.
Hey, great! Let's do the deal. Bring it on. Read my tagline.
Can you say Circus? What a joke this whole thing has become.Men, you may think I'm nuts, but if this is a taste of the future, armed resurection, REVOLTION, is in the cards to stop the left from ruining the country. Laugh if you will, but thats how I see it. Or we can just, ALL together, watch this great social experiment go right down the sh%^%er. Oil-em up.
And Dan Rather/CBS forgeries. America does not like piling on. Playing rough, but within the rules is popular - see Ice Hockey or Football. But piling on? No way.
This will just further damage Kerry by association. IMO.
The judge is acting on his own or responding to a legal action from the DNC? Something is very strange here. This is going beyond the usual court cases and actions. There is something very dirty going on here and now the courts are in it?
Relax, this is only an attempt by the lefties to get a better look at the signatures in the files, so they can make better forgeries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.