Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/28/2004 11:58:33 AM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: CHARLITE

Do you think sKerry realizes he's not on the same team with the Clintoons yet??


2 posted on 09/28/2004 11:59:49 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
The problem with a Kerry presidency for the Clintons is the possibility that Kerry may preside over a strengthening economy not of his making and spark international chaos by giving terrorist groups a breather

How is that different from the entire Clinton Administration?

3 posted on 09/28/2004 12:02:05 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
"Kerry may preside over a strengthening economy not of his making and spark international chaos by giving terrorist groups a breather by waffling in what is, in reality, World War III."

5 posted on 09/28/2004 12:03:03 PM PDT by Gucho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

democrats - the party for the "little people"


7 posted on 09/28/2004 12:03:56 PM PDT by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Ms. Clinton grew up in Chicago and now represents NY. I don't think anybody at all thinks of her as being from Arkansas.


11 posted on 09/28/2004 12:06:15 PM PDT by Restorer (They have the microphone, but we have the remote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

I think the Clintons want Kerry to lose just like Al Gore did: By just enough to keep the party energized, but with such bad public grace that he cannot be the standard bearer next time.

A Kerry rout is bad for the Party and Hillary's chances next time, but a Kerry victory would be worse. They need a marginal Kerry loss that makes the base indignant.


13 posted on 09/28/2004 12:07:35 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (‘We’re losing anyway, so I’ll surrender faster’ - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Wow! That is about the best analysis of both candidates and spouses I have ever read!


16 posted on 09/28/2004 12:08:56 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

John F. Kerry is the ultimate vanity candidate.


18 posted on 09/28/2004 12:09:16 PM PDT by gridlock (BARKEEP: Why the long face? HORSE: Ha ha, old joke. BARKEEP: Not you, I was talking to JF'n Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

GREAT READ!


19 posted on 09/28/2004 12:09:47 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

The Clintons are shutting up, but more interesting, so is Edwards. I suspect that Edwards knows that Kerry was involved in the Rathergate conspiracy, and he doesn't want to have anything to do with him.


24 posted on 09/28/2004 12:10:54 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

The Democrats don't really admire the clintons, whom they secretly regard as uncouth trailer trash, but they think they are very good fund raisers. The important thing is winning, and clinton won. Twice.

Kerry on the other hand is a loser. Better a winner than a loser, no matter how sleazy he is. At least, so say the Democrats, who have no honor and few moral values.


25 posted on 09/28/2004 12:11:02 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

I'm under the impression that Chris Long doesn't think much of either Kerry or the Clintons.

BTW, have any of you ever personally talked to a dyed-in-the wool liberal who thought that Clinton was scum? I haven't met one yet.


26 posted on 09/28/2004 12:11:18 PM PDT by JusPasenThru (Why don't you go and doof your own boofen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zip

ping


27 posted on 09/28/2004 12:11:47 PM PDT by Mrs Zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
I've begun to discount the Clinton Imperial Plan theory. Sure, Hillary is an ambitious opportunist, but not Bill. Bill is basically a lazy person who takes the easiest way out of everything. I think Bill is just going to be happy with riding the periphery and earning speaking fees. It's why he became president IMHO. A former governor of Arkansas might book two speeches a year from the Elks Club in Hope and Hot Springs. The perks from being president are many and enduring.

The only way Bubba would participate in some familial run for the Whitehouse in 2008 would be by death threat from Hillary. But we all know Bubba can be scarce when he wants to be..........

30 posted on 09/28/2004 12:13:17 PM PDT by blackdog (I survived John Dupont's wrestling camp and all I got was a lousy tee shirt and a prolapse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
General Powell would be the ideal Republican candidate for a public wanting leadership in the wake of a rudderless Kerry tenure.

Colin Powell is very liberal, and is pro-choice on abortion. It would be very difficult, if not impossible, for him to get the nomination and win a General Election. A significant portion of the base would stay home.

32 posted on 09/28/2004 12:15:05 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

I thought Clinton ( from his sick bed ) told Kerry to emphasize the economy


39 posted on 09/28/2004 12:25:32 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
The Clintons are people who can never get enough power, money, prestige, adoration--you name it.

Together, the Clintons are a black hole of narcissistic need on a galaxy-eating scale. Because they are both narcissists, they cannot suck the life out of each other, so they depend upon the people of America to be their source of dysfunctional supply.

I consider the Clinton Years of the 1990s to be the most dangerous period in recent American history. Clinton's election, and the adulation he received (and still receives from his worshippers) represented a time when about 42% of the American voters crossed over into the realm of insanity. Do a Google search of "narcissistic personality disorder" to get a glimpse of what these people would do to this nation if they ever get back into power. But for the grace of God, and Bill's inability to think and focus outside his pants, this nation would now be the equivalent of the last days of Rome.

47 posted on 09/28/2004 12:35:41 PM PDT by My2Cents (http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

If only the Clinton's really would shutup (and GO AWAY).


52 posted on 09/28/2004 12:44:14 PM PDT by Barb4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Nothing angers the Clintons more than the legacy of scandals that marked their White House years.

If true, how delusional can they be, not to see that this legacy was of their own making, from the White House Travel Office to the last stick of furniture going into the moving van!

53 posted on 09/28/2004 12:44:48 PM PDT by Hackle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Bump


54 posted on 09/28/2004 12:48:08 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Don't tell my mother I'm a reporter. She thinks I'm a towel boy in a bordello.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson